1 | \def\resstablestyletitle#1{\begin{small}{\textit{#1}}\end{small}} |
---|
2 | |
---|
3 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
---|
4 | \subsection{Partner 1: \irisa} |
---|
5 | |
---|
6 | \begin{description} |
---|
7 | \item [Equipment] |
---|
8 | No specific equipment acquisition. |
---|
9 | \item [Personnel costs] The faculty members involved in the project |
---|
10 | are François Charot (INRIA researcher) Steven Derrien (associate |
---|
11 | professor) and Charles Wagner (research engineer). The non-permanent |
---|
12 | personal required is a PhD student that will mainly work on ASIP |
---|
13 | generation. We are looking for a profile with strong informatic skills |
---|
14 | and good knowledge in computer architecture. |
---|
15 | \parlf |
---|
16 | The table below summarizes the manpower in \hommemois by tasks for both permanent and |
---|
17 | non-permanent personnels. The detail by deliverables is given in |
---|
18 | figure~\ref{table-livrables-1}. |
---|
19 | The non-permanent personnels costs represent \mustbecompleted{??\%} of the personnal |
---|
20 | costs. The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 100\% of |
---|
21 | the total ANR requested funding. |
---|
22 | \begin{center}\input{table_inria_cairn_short.tex}\end{center} |
---|
23 | \item [Subcontracting] |
---|
24 | No subcontracting costs. |
---|
25 | \item [Travel] |
---|
26 | The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as participation to |
---|
27 | conferences. The travel costs are estimated to \mustbecompleted{??\%} of the total |
---|
28 | requested ANR funding. |
---|
29 | \item [Expenses for inward billing] |
---|
30 | The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% of the total |
---|
31 | requested ANR funding. |
---|
32 | \end{description} |
---|
33 | |
---|
34 | |
---|
35 | \subsection{Partner 2: \lip} |
---|
36 | |
---|
37 | \begin{description} |
---|
38 | \item [Equipment] |
---|
39 | No specific equipment acquisition. The costs for depreciation of |
---|
40 | workstations is evaluated to 4\% of the total requested ANR funding. |
---|
41 | \item [Personnel costs] |
---|
42 | The faculty members involved in the project are an emeritus |
---|
43 | professor at ENS Lyon (Paul Feautrier) and a research associate |
---|
44 | (CR2) at INRIA Rh\^one-Alpes (Christophe Alias). The non-permanent |
---|
45 | personel required is a PhD student that will work on network process |
---|
46 | generation from polyhedral loops, then on extensions to |
---|
47 | non-polyhedral loops. We are looking for a student with both |
---|
48 | theoretical and practical skills, that will be able to get a |
---|
49 | sufficient understanding of the polyhedral techniques and to produce |
---|
50 | a working implementation. |
---|
51 | \parlf |
---|
52 | The table below summarizes the \hommemois by |
---|
53 | deliverables and tasks for both permanent and non-permanent |
---|
54 | personnels. The non-permanent personnels costs represent 23\% of |
---|
55 | the personnal costs. The requested funding for non |
---|
56 | permanent personnels is 100\% of the total ANR requested funding. |
---|
57 | \begin{center}\input{table_inria_compsys_full.tex}\end{center} |
---|
58 | \item [Subcontracting] |
---|
59 | No subcontracting costs. |
---|
60 | \item [Travel] |
---|
61 | The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as |
---|
62 | participation to conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 20\% |
---|
63 | of the total requested ANR funding. |
---|
64 | \item [Expenses for inward billing] |
---|
65 | The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated |
---|
66 | to 4\% of the total requested ANR funding. |
---|
67 | \end{description} |
---|
68 | |
---|
69 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
---|
70 | \subsection{Partner 3: \tima} |
---|
71 | |
---|
72 | \begin{description} |
---|
73 | \item [Equipment] |
---|
74 | No specific equipment acquisition. |
---|
75 | \item [Personnel costs] |
---|
76 | The permanent personnels involved in the project are professor and assistant professor |
---|
77 | (Fr\'ed\'eric P\'etrot and Olivier Muller). |
---|
78 | The non permanent personnels are Phd students and post-doc researchers. |
---|
79 | Related costs are estimated in \hommemois. |
---|
80 | One phd student (Adrien Prost-Boucle), funded by the french ministry of research, will |
---|
81 | be working on the project. |
---|
82 | One 100\% funded phd student will be hired in september 2010. A post-doc researcher will |
---|
83 | be hired at the end of 2011 for one year and an half. |
---|
84 | The PhD student will mainly work on the evolution of UGH HLS tool. Thus, we are looking |
---|
85 | for a profile with strong informatic skills and good knowledge in computer architecture. |
---|
86 | The post-doc will mainly work on dynamic reconfiguration and HPC. The required profile |
---|
87 | will be more oriented on computer architecture and advanced digital design. |
---|
88 | \parlf |
---|
89 | The table below sumarizes the man power in \hommemois by tasks for both permanent and |
---|
90 | non-permanent personnels. The detail by deliverables is given in |
---|
91 | figure~\ref{table-livrables-1}. |
---|
92 | The requested funding for personnels represent 50\% of the total personnal costs. |
---|
93 | The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 85\% of the total ANR requested |
---|
94 | funding. |
---|
95 | \begin{center}\input{table_tima_short.tex}\end{center} |
---|
96 | \item [Subcontracting] |
---|
97 | No subcontracting costs. |
---|
98 | \item [Travel] |
---|
99 | The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as participation to |
---|
100 | conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 11\% of the total requested ANR funding. |
---|
101 | \item [Expenses for inward billing] |
---|
102 | The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% of the total |
---|
103 | requested ANR funding. |
---|
104 | \end{description} |
---|
105 | |
---|
106 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
---|
107 | \subsection{Partner 4: \ubs} |
---|
108 | |
---|
109 | \begin {description} |
---|
110 | \item [Equipment] |
---|
111 | In order to validate the design flow project, the Lab-STICC laboratory will buy FPGA |
---|
112 | developpement boards. The cost for these FPGA boards is estimated to 3\% of the total |
---|
113 | ANR funding. |
---|
114 | \item [Personnel costs] |
---|
115 | The faculty members involved in the project are associate professors (Philippe COUSSY, |
---|
116 | Cyrille CHAVET) or research engineers (Dominique HELLER). All non-permanent personnel |
---|
117 | costs are estimated in \hommemois for senior researchers (post-doc or research |
---|
118 | engineers). |
---|
119 | \parlf |
---|
120 | The table below sumarizes the man power in \hommemois by tasks for both permanent and |
---|
121 | non-permanent personnels. The detail by deliverables is given in |
---|
122 | figure~\ref{table-livrables-2}. |
---|
123 | The non-permanent personnels costs represent 50\% of the personnal costs. |
---|
124 | The requested funding for non permanent personnels is about 83\% of the total ANR |
---|
125 | requested funding. |
---|
126 | \begin{center}\input{table_ubs_short.tex}\end{center} |
---|
127 | \item [Subcontracting] |
---|
128 | No subcontracting costs. |
---|
129 | \item [Travel] |
---|
130 | The travel costs are associated to management and meeting as well as participation to |
---|
131 | conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 10\% of the total requested ANR funding. |
---|
132 | \item [Expenses for inward billing] |
---|
133 | The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% of the total |
---|
134 | requested ANR funding. |
---|
135 | \end {description} |
---|
136 | |
---|
137 | |
---|
138 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
---|
139 | \subsection{Partner 5: \upmc} |
---|
140 | |
---|
141 | \begin{description} |
---|
142 | \item[Equipment] |
---|
143 | No specific equipment acquisition is required for this project. |
---|
144 | The costs for depreciation of workstations and pre-existing FPGA boards are evaluated |
---|
145 | to 7\% of the total requested ANR funding. |
---|
146 | \item[Personnel costs] |
---|
147 | The permanent personnels involved in the project are professors or assistant |
---|
148 | processors (Alain Greiner and Ivan Aug\'e). |
---|
149 | All non permanent personnel costs are estimated in \hommemois for senior researchers |
---|
150 | (post-doc or research engineers). |
---|
151 | The table below sumarizes the man power by tasks in \hommemois for both permanent and |
---|
152 | non-permanent personnels. |
---|
153 | The detail by deliverables is given in figure~\ref{table-livrables-2}. |
---|
154 | The non-permanent personnels costs represent 50\% of the personnal costs. |
---|
155 | The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 79\% of the total ANR |
---|
156 | requested funding. |
---|
157 | \begin{center}\input{table_upmc_short.tex}\end{center} |
---|
158 | \item[Subcontracting] |
---|
159 | No subcontracting costs. |
---|
160 | \item[Travel] |
---|
161 | The travel costs are associated to management and coordination meeting as |
---|
162 | well as participation to conferences. The travel costs are estimated |
---|
163 | to 10\% of the total requested ANR funding. |
---|
164 | \item[Expenses for inward billing] |
---|
165 | The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% |
---|
166 | of the total requested ANR funding. |
---|
167 | \end{description} |
---|
168 | |
---|
169 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
---|
170 | \subsection{Partner 6: \xilinx} |
---|
171 | |
---|
172 | \begin{description} |
---|
173 | \item[Equipment] |
---|
174 | No specific equipment acquisition is required for this project. |
---|
175 | \item[Personnel costs] |
---|
176 | \xilinx employees involved in the project are permanent Software Engineers. |
---|
177 | The man power detail in \hommemois by deliverables is given in |
---|
178 | figure~\ref{table-livrables-1} and a sumary by task in the following table. |
---|
179 | \begin{center}\input{table_xilinx_short.tex}\end{center} |
---|
180 | \item[Subcontracting] |
---|
181 | No subcontracting costs. |
---|
182 | \item[Travel] |
---|
183 | The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as participation to |
---|
184 | conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 2\% of the total requested ANR funding. |
---|
185 | \item[Expenses for inward billing] none |
---|
186 | \item[Other working costs] none |
---|
187 | \end{description} |
---|
188 | |
---|
189 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
---|
190 | \subsection{Partner 7: \bull} |
---|
191 | |
---|
192 | \begin{description} |
---|
193 | \item[Equipment] |
---|
194 | Acquisition of a FPGA development board will represent the main equipment cost for |
---|
195 | Bull in COACH. It is estimated at about 5\% (tbc) of the total funding. |
---|
196 | \item[Personnel costs] |
---|
197 | A permanent engineer will be assigned full time to the project for a duration of 20 |
---|
198 | months as shown in the table below that gives the man power in \hommemois: |
---|
199 | \begin{center}\input{table_bull_full.tex}\end{center} |
---|
200 | \item[Subcontracting] |
---|
201 | No subcontracting costs. |
---|
202 | \item[Travel] |
---|
203 | Application of a standard 10\% of the total funding to travel costs. |
---|
204 | \item[Expenses for inward billing] |
---|
205 | Costs justified by inward billing are estimated to about 5\% of the total funding. |
---|
206 | \item[Other working costs] none |
---|
207 | \end{description} |
---|
208 | |
---|
209 | |
---|
210 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
---|
211 | \subsection{Partner 8: \thales} |
---|
212 | |
---|
213 | \begin{description} |
---|
214 | \item[Equipment] |
---|
215 | In order to validate the design flow,TRT will buy FPGA developpement boards. The cost |
---|
216 | for these FPGA boards is estimated to 20 k\euro (6\% of the total ANR funding). |
---|
217 | \item[Personnel costs] |
---|
218 | The effort to adapt SPEAR DE to generate the input files to COACH framework is |
---|
219 | estimated to 13 \hommemois. |
---|
220 | The effort to describe and develop the application is estimated to 14 \hommemois. |
---|
221 | Finally we need one \hommemois for the partiticipation to the global specification in task 2. |
---|
222 | This is sumarized in the table below: |
---|
223 | \begin{center}\input{table_thales_full.tex}\end{center} |
---|
224 | \item[Subcontracting] |
---|
225 | No subcontracting costs. |
---|
226 | \item[Travel] |
---|
227 | The travel costs are associated to meeting, plenaries as well as participation to |
---|
228 | conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 10 k\euro. The travel costs are estimated to |
---|
229 | 5\% of the total requested ANR funding. |
---|
230 | \item[Expenses for inward billing] none |
---|
231 | \item[Other working costs] none |
---|
232 | \end{description} |
---|
233 | |
---|
234 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
---|
235 | \subsection{Partner 9: \zied} |
---|
236 | |
---|
237 | \begin{description} |
---|
238 | \item[Equipment] |
---|
239 | No equipement costs. |
---|
240 | \item[Personnel costs] |
---|
241 | The effort to define SoC architecture and adapt eFPGA interface to generate is |
---|
242 | estimated to 9.6 \hommemois. |
---|
243 | The effort to develop demonstrator and to extract eFPGA timining characteristics is |
---|
244 | estimated to 4.8 \hommemois. |
---|
245 | Finally we need one 3.6 man.month for the evaluation of the FLEXRAS solution. |
---|
246 | The table below summarizes the these manpower costs in \hommemois for the deliverables |
---|
247 | and by tasks. |
---|
248 | \begin{center}\input{table_zied_full.tex}\end{center} |
---|
249 | \item[Subcontracting] |
---|
250 | No subcontracting costs. |
---|
251 | \item[Travel] |
---|
252 | No travel costs. |
---|
253 | \item[Expenses for inward billing] none |
---|
254 | \item[Other working costs] none |
---|
255 | \end{description} |
---|
256 | |
---|
257 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
---|
258 | \subsection{Partner 10: \navtel} |
---|
259 | |
---|
260 | \begin{description} |
---|
261 | \item[Equipment] |
---|
262 | Navtel will use FPGA board with ARM processors for the validation. |
---|
263 | The costs for depreciation of the board and the instrument of test |
---|
264 | are evaluated to 7\% of the total requested ANR funding. |
---|
265 | \item[Personnel costs] |
---|
266 | A permanent engineer will be assigned on average 1/3 time for |
---|
267 | all the duration of the project. |
---|
268 | The table below shows the estimated manpower cost in \hommemois for the deliverables |
---|
269 | and by tasks. |
---|
270 | \begin{center}\input{table_navtel_full.tex}\end{center} |
---|
271 | \item[Subcontracting] |
---|
272 | No subcontracting costs. |
---|
273 | \item[Travel] |
---|
274 | The travel costs are associated to meeting, plenaries as well as participation to |
---|
275 | conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 3 k\euro. |
---|
276 | \item[Expenses for inward billing] none |
---|
277 | \item[Other working costs] none |
---|
278 | \end{description} |
---|
279 | % |
---|
280 | \begin{landscape} |
---|
281 | \begin{figure} |
---|
282 | \begin{small} |
---|
283 | \settowidth\desclen{XILINX RTL optimisation (5)} |
---|
284 | \def\resstablestyletitle#1{\parbox{\desclen}{\textit{#1}}} |
---|
285 | \begin{minipage}[b]{.47\linewidth}\center |
---|
286 | \input{table_inria_cairn_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex}\\ \irisa \vspace{2.5ex}\\ |
---|
287 | \input{table_xilinx_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex}\\ \xilinx\\ |
---|
288 | \end{minipage}\hfill\begin{minipage}[b]{.47\linewidth}\center |
---|
289 | \input{table_tima_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex} \\ \tima |
---|
290 | \end{minipage} |
---|
291 | \end{small} |
---|
292 | \caption{\label{table-livrables-1} Man power in \hommemois for the deliverables (1)} |
---|
293 | \end{figure} |
---|
294 | % |
---|
295 | \begin{figure} |
---|
296 | \begin{small} |
---|
297 | \settowidth\desclen{XILINX RTL optimisation (5)} |
---|
298 | \def\resstablestyletitle#1{\parbox{\desclen}{\textit{#1}}} |
---|
299 | \begin{minipage}[b]{.47\linewidth}\center |
---|
300 | \input{table_ubs_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex}\\ \ubs \vspace{2.5ex}\\ |
---|
301 | %\input{table_thales_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex}\\ \thales \\ |
---|
302 | \end{minipage}\hfill\begin{minipage}[b]{.47\linewidth}\center |
---|
303 | \input{table_upmc_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex} \\ \upmc |
---|
304 | \end{minipage} |
---|
305 | \end{small} |
---|
306 | \caption{\label{table-livrables-2} Man power in \hommemois for the deliverables (2)} |
---|
307 | \end{figure} |
---|
308 | \end{landscape} |
---|