1 | \def\resstablestyletitle#1{\begin{small}{\textit{#1}}\end{small}} |
---|
2 | |
---|
3 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
---|
4 | \subsection{Partner 1: \irisa} |
---|
5 | |
---|
6 | \begin{description} |
---|
7 | \item [Equipment] |
---|
8 | No specific equipment acquisition. |
---|
9 | \item [Personnel costs] The faculty members involved in the project |
---|
10 | are François Charot (INRIA researcher), Steven Derrien (associate |
---|
11 | professor), Christophe Wolinski (professor) and Charles Wagner |
---|
12 | (research engineer). The non-permanent personal required is a PhD |
---|
13 | student that will mainly work on ASIP generation. We are looking for |
---|
14 | a profile with strong informatic skills and good knowledge in |
---|
15 | computer architecture. |
---|
16 | \parlf |
---|
17 | The table below summarizes the manpower in \hommemois by tasks for both permanent and |
---|
18 | non-permanent personnels. The detail by deliverables is given in |
---|
19 | figure~\ref{table-livrables-1}. |
---|
20 | The non-permanent personnels costs represent {48\%} of the personnal |
---|
21 | costs. The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 100\% of |
---|
22 | the total ANR requested funding. |
---|
23 | \begin{center}\input{table_inria_cairn_short.tex}\end{center} |
---|
24 | \item [Subcontracting] |
---|
25 | No subcontracting costs. |
---|
26 | \item [Travel] |
---|
27 | The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as participation to |
---|
28 | conferences. The travel costs are estimated to {7,5\%} of the total |
---|
29 | requested ANR funding. |
---|
30 | \item [Expenses for inward billing] |
---|
31 | The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% of the total |
---|
32 | requested ANR funding. |
---|
33 | \end{description} |
---|
34 | |
---|
35 | |
---|
36 | \subsection{Partner 2: \lip} |
---|
37 | |
---|
38 | \begin{description} |
---|
39 | \item [Equipment] |
---|
40 | No specific equipment acquisition. The costs for depreciation of |
---|
41 | workstations is evaluated to 4\% of the total requested ANR funding. |
---|
42 | \item [Personnel costs] |
---|
43 | The faculty members involved in the project are an emeritus |
---|
44 | professor at ENS Lyon (Paul Feautrier) and a research associate |
---|
45 | (CR2) at INRIA Rh\^one-Alpes (Christophe Alias). The non-permanent |
---|
46 | personel required is a PhD student that will work on network process |
---|
47 | generation from polyhedral loops, then on extensions to |
---|
48 | non-polyhedral loops. We are looking for a student with both |
---|
49 | theoretical and practical skills, that will be able to get a |
---|
50 | sufficient understanding of the polyhedral techniques and to produce |
---|
51 | a working implementation. |
---|
52 | \parlf |
---|
53 | The table below summarizes the \hommemois by |
---|
54 | deliverables and tasks for both permanent and non-permanent |
---|
55 | personnels. The non-permanent personnels costs represent 26\% of |
---|
56 | the personnal costs. The requested funding for non |
---|
57 | permanent personnels is 100\% of the total ANR requested funding. |
---|
58 | \begin{center}\input{table_inria_compsys_full.tex}\end{center} |
---|
59 | \item [Subcontracting] |
---|
60 | No subcontracting costs. |
---|
61 | \item [Travel] |
---|
62 | The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as |
---|
63 | participation to conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 20\% |
---|
64 | of the total requested ANR funding. |
---|
65 | \item [Expenses for inward billing] |
---|
66 | The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated |
---|
67 | to 4\% of the total requested ANR funding. |
---|
68 | \end{description} |
---|
69 | |
---|
70 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
---|
71 | \subsection{Partner 3: \tima} |
---|
72 | |
---|
73 | \begin{description} |
---|
74 | \item [Equipment] |
---|
75 | No specific equipment acquisition. |
---|
76 | \item [Personnel costs] |
---|
77 | The permanent personnels involved in the project are professor and assistant professor |
---|
78 | (Fr\'ed\'eric P\'etrot and Olivier Muller). |
---|
79 | The non permanent personnels are Phd students and post-doc researchers. |
---|
80 | Related costs are estimated in \hommemois. |
---|
81 | One phd student (Adrien Prost-Boucle), funded by the french ministry of research, will |
---|
82 | be working on the project. |
---|
83 | One 100\% funded phd student will be hired in september 2010. A post-doc researcher will |
---|
84 | be hired at the end of 2011 for one year and an half. |
---|
85 | The PhD student will mainly work on the evolution of UGH HLS tool. Thus, we are looking |
---|
86 | for a profile with strong informatic skills and good knowledge in computer architecture. |
---|
87 | The post-doc will mainly work on dynamic reconfiguration and HPC. The required profile |
---|
88 | will be more oriented on computer architecture and advanced digital design. |
---|
89 | \parlf |
---|
90 | The table below sumarizes the man power in \hommemois by tasks for both permanent and |
---|
91 | non-permanent personnels. The detail by deliverables is given in |
---|
92 | figure~\ref{table-livrables-1}. |
---|
93 | The requested funding for personnels represent 50\% of the total personnal costs. |
---|
94 | The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 85\% of the total ANR requested |
---|
95 | funding. |
---|
96 | \begin{center}\input{table_tima_short.tex}\end{center} |
---|
97 | \item [Subcontracting] |
---|
98 | No subcontracting costs. |
---|
99 | \item [Travel] |
---|
100 | The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as participation to |
---|
101 | conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 11\% of the total requested ANR funding. |
---|
102 | \item [Expenses for inward billing] |
---|
103 | The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% of the total |
---|
104 | requested ANR funding. |
---|
105 | \end{description} |
---|
106 | |
---|
107 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
---|
108 | \subsection{Partner 4: \ubs} |
---|
109 | |
---|
110 | \begin {description} |
---|
111 | \item [Equipment] |
---|
112 | In order to validate the design flow project, the Lab-STICC laboratory will buy FPGA |
---|
113 | developpement boards. The cost for these FPGA boards is estimated to 3\% of the total |
---|
114 | ANR funding. |
---|
115 | \item [Personnel costs] |
---|
116 | The faculty members involved in the project are associate professors (Philippe COUSSY, |
---|
117 | Cyrille CHAVET) or research engineers (Dominique HELLER). All non-permanent personnel |
---|
118 | costs are estimated in \hommemois for senior researchers (post-doc or research |
---|
119 | engineers). |
---|
120 | \parlf |
---|
121 | The table below sumarizes the man power in \hommemois by tasks for both permanent and |
---|
122 | non-permanent personnels. The detail by deliverables is given in |
---|
123 | figure~\ref{table-livrables-2}. |
---|
124 | The non-permanent personnels costs represent 50\% of the personnal costs. |
---|
125 | The requested funding for non permanent personnels is about 83\% of the total ANR |
---|
126 | requested funding. |
---|
127 | \begin{center}\input{table_ubs_short.tex}\end{center} |
---|
128 | \item [Subcontracting] |
---|
129 | No subcontracting costs. |
---|
130 | \item [Travel] |
---|
131 | The travel costs are associated to management and meeting as well as participation to |
---|
132 | conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 10\% of the total requested ANR funding. |
---|
133 | \item [Expenses for inward billing] |
---|
134 | The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% of the total |
---|
135 | requested ANR funding. |
---|
136 | \end {description} |
---|
137 | |
---|
138 | |
---|
139 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
---|
140 | \subsection{Partner 5: \upmc} |
---|
141 | |
---|
142 | \begin{description} |
---|
143 | \item[Equipment] |
---|
144 | No specific equipment acquisition is required for this project. |
---|
145 | The costs for depreciation of workstations and pre-existing FPGA boards are evaluated |
---|
146 | to 7\% of the total requested ANR funding. |
---|
147 | \item[Personnel costs] |
---|
148 | The permanent personnels involved in the project are professors or assistant |
---|
149 | processors (Alain Greiner and Ivan Aug\'e). |
---|
150 | All non permanent personnel costs are estimated in \hommemois for senior researchers |
---|
151 | (post-doc or research engineers). |
---|
152 | The table below sumarizes the man power by tasks in \hommemois for both permanent and |
---|
153 | non-permanent personnels. |
---|
154 | The detail by deliverables is given in figure~\ref{table-livrables-2}. |
---|
155 | The non-permanent personnels costs represent 50\% of the personnal costs. |
---|
156 | The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 79\% of the total ANR |
---|
157 | requested funding. |
---|
158 | \begin{center}\input{table_upmc_short.tex}\end{center} |
---|
159 | \item[Subcontracting] |
---|
160 | No subcontracting costs. |
---|
161 | \item[Travel] |
---|
162 | The travel costs are associated to management and coordination meeting as |
---|
163 | well as participation to conferences. The travel costs are estimated |
---|
164 | to 10\% of the total requested ANR funding. |
---|
165 | \item[Expenses for inward billing] |
---|
166 | The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% |
---|
167 | of the total requested ANR funding. |
---|
168 | \end{description} |
---|
169 | |
---|
170 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
---|
171 | \subsection{Partner 6: \xilinx} |
---|
172 | |
---|
173 | \begin{description} |
---|
174 | \item[Equipment] |
---|
175 | No specific equipment acquisition is required for this project. |
---|
176 | \item[Personnel costs] |
---|
177 | \xilinx employees involved in the project are permanent Software Engineers. |
---|
178 | The man power detail in \hommemois by deliverables is given in |
---|
179 | figure~\ref{table-livrables-1} and a sumary by task in the following table. |
---|
180 | \begin{center}\input{table_xilinx_short.tex}\end{center} |
---|
181 | \item[Subcontracting] |
---|
182 | No subcontracting costs. |
---|
183 | \item[Travel] |
---|
184 | The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as participation to |
---|
185 | conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 2\% of the total requested ANR funding. |
---|
186 | \item[Expenses for inward billing] none |
---|
187 | \item[Other working costs] none |
---|
188 | \end{description} |
---|
189 | |
---|
190 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
---|
191 | \subsection{Partner 7: \bull} |
---|
192 | |
---|
193 | \begin{description} |
---|
194 | \item[Equipment] |
---|
195 | Acquisition of a FPGA development board will represent the main equipment cost for |
---|
196 | Bull in COACH. It is estimated at about 5\% (tbc) of the total funding. |
---|
197 | \item[Personnel costs] |
---|
198 | A permanent engineer will be assigned full time to the project for a duration of 20 |
---|
199 | months as shown in the table below that gives the man power in \hommemois: |
---|
200 | \begin{center}\input{table_bull_full.tex}\end{center} |
---|
201 | \item[Subcontracting] |
---|
202 | No subcontracting costs. |
---|
203 | \item[Travel] |
---|
204 | Application of a standard 10\% of the total funding to travel costs. |
---|
205 | \item[Expenses for inward billing] |
---|
206 | Costs justified by inward billing are estimated to about 5\% of the total funding. |
---|
207 | \item[Other working costs] none |
---|
208 | \end{description} |
---|
209 | |
---|
210 | |
---|
211 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
---|
212 | \subsection{Partner 8: \thales} |
---|
213 | |
---|
214 | \begin{description} |
---|
215 | \item[Equipment] |
---|
216 | In order to validate the design flow,TRT will buy FPGA developpement boards. The cost |
---|
217 | for these FPGA boards is estimated to 20 k\euro (6\% of the total ANR funding). |
---|
218 | \item[Personnel costs] |
---|
219 | The effort to adapt SPEAR DE to generate the input files to COACH framework is |
---|
220 | estimated to 13 \hommemois. |
---|
221 | The effort to describe and develop the application is estimated to 14 \hommemois. |
---|
222 | Finally we need one \hommemois for the partiticipation to the global specification in task 2. |
---|
223 | This is sumarized in the table below: |
---|
224 | \begin{center}\input{table_thales_full.tex}\end{center} |
---|
225 | \item[Subcontracting] |
---|
226 | No subcontracting costs. |
---|
227 | \item[Travel] |
---|
228 | The travel costs are associated to meeting, plenaries as well as participation to |
---|
229 | conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 10 k\euro. The travel costs are estimated to |
---|
230 | 5\% of the total requested ANR funding. |
---|
231 | \item[Expenses for inward billing] none |
---|
232 | \item[Other working costs] none |
---|
233 | \end{description} |
---|
234 | |
---|
235 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
---|
236 | \subsection{Partner 9: \zied} |
---|
237 | |
---|
238 | \begin{description} |
---|
239 | \item[Equipment] |
---|
240 | No equipement costs. |
---|
241 | \item[Personnel costs] |
---|
242 | The effort to define SoC architecture and adapt eFPGA interface to generate is |
---|
243 | estimated to 9.6 \hommemois. |
---|
244 | The effort to develop demonstrator and to extract eFPGA timining characteristics is |
---|
245 | estimated to 4.8 \hommemois. |
---|
246 | Finally we need one 3.6 man.month for the evaluation of the FLEXRAS solution. |
---|
247 | The table below summarizes the these manpower costs in \hommemois for the deliverables |
---|
248 | and by tasks. |
---|
249 | \begin{center}\input{table_zied_full.tex}\end{center} |
---|
250 | \item[Subcontracting] |
---|
251 | No subcontracting costs. |
---|
252 | \item[Travel] |
---|
253 | No travel costs. |
---|
254 | \item[Expenses for inward billing] none |
---|
255 | \item[Other working costs] none |
---|
256 | \end{description} |
---|
257 | |
---|
258 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
---|
259 | \subsection{Partner 10: \navtel} |
---|
260 | |
---|
261 | \begin{description} |
---|
262 | \item[Equipment] |
---|
263 | Navtel will use FPGA board with ARM processors for the validation. |
---|
264 | The costs for depreciation of the board and the instrument of test |
---|
265 | are evaluated to 7\% of the total requested ANR funding. |
---|
266 | \item[Personnel costs] |
---|
267 | A permanent engineer will be assigned on average 1/3 time for |
---|
268 | all the duration of the project. |
---|
269 | The table below shows the estimated manpower cost in \hommemois for the deliverables |
---|
270 | and by tasks. |
---|
271 | \begin{center}\input{table_navtel_full.tex}\end{center} |
---|
272 | \item[Subcontracting] |
---|
273 | No subcontracting costs. |
---|
274 | \item[Travel] |
---|
275 | The travel costs are associated to meeting, plenaries as well as participation to |
---|
276 | conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 3 k\euro. |
---|
277 | \item[Expenses for inward billing] none |
---|
278 | \item[Other working costs] none |
---|
279 | \end{description} |
---|
280 | % |
---|
281 | \begin{landscape} |
---|
282 | \begin{figure} |
---|
283 | \begin{small} |
---|
284 | \settowidth\desclen{XILINX RTL optimisation (5)} |
---|
285 | \def\resstablestyletitle#1{\parbox{\desclen}{\textit{#1}}} |
---|
286 | \begin{minipage}[b]{.47\linewidth}\center |
---|
287 | \input{table_inria_cairn_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex}\\ \irisa \vspace{2.5ex}\\ |
---|
288 | \input{table_xilinx_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex}\\ \xilinx\\ |
---|
289 | \end{minipage}\hfill\begin{minipage}[b]{.47\linewidth}\center |
---|
290 | \input{table_tima_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex} \\ \tima |
---|
291 | \end{minipage} |
---|
292 | \end{small} |
---|
293 | \caption{\label{table-livrables-1} Man power in \hommemois for the deliverables (1)} |
---|
294 | \end{figure} |
---|
295 | % |
---|
296 | \begin{figure} |
---|
297 | \begin{small} |
---|
298 | \settowidth\desclen{XILINX RTL optimisation (5)} |
---|
299 | \def\resstablestyletitle#1{\parbox{\desclen}{\textit{#1}}} |
---|
300 | \begin{minipage}[b]{.47\linewidth}\center |
---|
301 | \input{table_ubs_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex}\\ \ubs \vspace{2.5ex}\\ |
---|
302 | %\input{table_thales_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex}\\ \thales \\ |
---|
303 | \end{minipage}\hfill\begin{minipage}[b]{.47\linewidth}\center |
---|
304 | \input{table_upmc_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex} \\ \upmc |
---|
305 | \end{minipage} |
---|
306 | \end{small} |
---|
307 | \caption{\label{table-livrables-2} Man power in \hommemois for the deliverables (2)} |
---|
308 | \end{figure} |
---|
309 | \end{landscape} |
---|