\def\resstablestyletitle#1{\begin{small}{\textit{#1}}\end{small}} %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% \subsection{Partner 1: \irisa} \begin{description} \item [Equipment] No specific equipment acquisition. \item [Personnel costs] The faculty members involved in the project are François Charot (INRIA researcher) Steven Derrien (associate professor) and Charles Wagner (research engineer). The non-permanent personal required is a PhD student that will mainly work on ASIP generation. We are looking for a profile with strong informatic skills and good knowledge in computer architecture. \parlf The table below summarizes the manpower in \hommemois by tasks for both permanent and non-permanent personnels. The detail by deliverables is given in figure~\ref{table-livrables-1}. The non-permanent personnels costs represent \mustbecompleted{??\%} of the personnal costs. The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 100\% of the total ANR requested funding. \begin{center}\input{table_inria_cairn_short.tex}\end{center} \item [Subcontracting] No subcontracting costs. \item [Travel] The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as participation to conferences. The travel costs are estimated to \mustbecompleted{??\%} of the total requested ANR funding. \item [Expenses for inward billing] The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% of the total requested ANR funding. \end{description} \subsection{Partner 2: \lip} \begin{description} \item [Equipment] No specific equipment acquisition. The costs for depreciation of workstations is evaluated to 4\% of the total requested ANR funding. \item [Personnel costs] The faculty members involved in the project are an emeritus professor at ENS Lyon (Paul Feautrier) and a research associate (CR2) at INRIA Rh\^one-Alpes (Christophe Alias). The non-permanent personel required is a PhD student that will work on network process generation from polyhedral loops, then on extensions to non-polyhedral loops. We are looking for a student with both theoretical and practical skills, that will be able to get a sufficient understanding of the polyhedral techniques and to produce a working implementation. \parlf The table below summarizes the \hommemois by deliverables and tasks for both permanent and non-permanent personnels. The non-permanent personnels costs represent 23\% of the personnal costs. The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 100\% of the total ANR requested funding. \begin{center}\input{table_inria_compsys_full.tex}\end{center} \item [Subcontracting] No subcontracting costs. \item [Travel] The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as participation to conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 20\% of the total requested ANR funding. \item [Expenses for inward billing] The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% of the total requested ANR funding. \end{description} %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% \subsection{Partner 3: \tima} \begin{description} \item [Equipment] No specific equipment acquisition. \item [Personnel costs] The permanent personnels involved in the project are professor and assistant professor (Fr\'ed\'eric P\'etrot and Olivier Muller). The non permanent personnels are Phd students and post-doc researchers. Related costs are estimated in \hommemois. One phd student (Adrien Prost-Boucle), funded by the french ministry of research, will be working on the project. One 100\% funded phd student will be hired in september 2010. A post-doc researcher will be hired at the end of 2011 for one year and an half. The PhD student will mainly work on the evolution of UGH HLS tool. Thus, we are looking for a profile with strong informatic skills and good knowledge in computer architecture. The post-doc will mainly work on dynamic reconfiguration and HPC. The required profile will be more oriented on computer architecture and advanced digital design. \parlf The table below sumarizes the man power in \hommemois by tasks for both permanent and non-permanent personnels. The detail by deliverables is given in figure~\ref{table-livrables-1}. The requested funding for personnels represent 50\% of the total personnal costs. The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 85\% of the total ANR requested funding. \begin{center}\input{table_tima_short.tex}\end{center} \item [Subcontracting] No subcontracting costs. \item [Travel] The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as participation to conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 11\% of the total requested ANR funding. \item [Expenses for inward billing] The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% of the total requested ANR funding. \end{description} %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% \subsection{Partner 4: \ubs} \begin {description} \item [Equipment] In order to validate the design flow project, the Lab-STICC laboratory will buy FPGA developpement boards. The cost for these FPGA boards is estimated to 3\% of the total ANR funding. \item [Personnel costs] The faculty members involved in the project are associate professors (Philippe COUSSY, Cyrille CHAVET) or research engineers (Dominique HELLER). All non-permanent personnel costs are estimated in \hommemois for senior researchers (post-doc or research engineers). \parlf The table below sumarizes the man power in \hommemois by tasks for both permanent and non-permanent personnels. The detail by deliverables is given in figure~\ref{table-livrables-2}. The non-permanent personnels costs represent 50\% of the personnal costs. The requested funding for non permanent personnels is about 83\% of the total ANR requested funding. \begin{center}\input{table_ubs_short.tex}\end{center} \item [Subcontracting] No subcontracting costs. \item [Travel] The travel costs are associated to management and meeting as well as participation to conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 10\% of the total requested ANR funding. \item [Expenses for inward billing] The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% of the total requested ANR funding. \end {description} %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% \subsection{Partner 5: \upmc} \begin{description} \item[Equipment] No specific equipment acquisition is required for this project. The costs for depreciation of workstations and pre-existing FPGA boards are evaluated to 7\% of the total requested ANR funding. \item[Personnel costs] The permanent personnels involved in the project are professors or assistant processors (Alain Greiner and Ivan Aug\'e). All non permanent personnel costs are estimated in \hommemois for senior researchers (post-doc or research engineers). The table below sumarizes the man power by tasks in \hommemois for both permanent and non-permanent personnels. The detail by deliverables is given in figure~\ref{table-livrables-2}. The non-permanent personnels costs represent 50\% of the personnal costs. The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 79\% of the total ANR requested funding. \begin{center}\input{table_upmc_short.tex}\end{center} \item[Subcontracting] No subcontracting costs. \item[Travel] The travel costs are associated to management and coordination meeting as well as participation to conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 10\% of the total requested ANR funding. \item[Expenses for inward billing] The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% of the total requested ANR funding. \end{description} %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% \subsection{Partner 6: \xilinx} \begin{description} \item[Equipment] No specific equipment acquisition is required for this project. \item[Personnel costs] \xilinx employees involved in the project are permanent Software Engineers. The man power detail in \hommemois by deliverables is given in figure~\ref{table-livrables-1} and a sumary by task in the following table. \begin{center}\input{table_xilinx_short.tex}\end{center} \item[Subcontracting] No subcontracting costs. \item[Travel] The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as participation to conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 2\% of the total requested ANR funding. \item[Expenses for inward billing] none \item[Other working costs] none \end{description} %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% \subsection{Partner 7: \bull} \begin{description} \item[Equipment] Acquisition of a FPGA development board will represent the main equipment cost for Bull in COACH. It is estimated at about 5\% (tbc) of the total funding. \item[Personnel costs] A permanent engineer will be assigned full time to the project for a duration of 20 months as shown in the table below that gives the man power in \hommemois: \begin{center}\input{table_bull_full.tex}\end{center} \item[Subcontracting] No subcontracting costs. \item[Travel] Application of a standard 10\% of the total funding to travel costs. \item[Expenses for inward billing] Costs justified by inward billing are estimated to about 5\% of the total funding. \item[Other working costs] none \end{description} %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% \subsection{Partner 8: \thales} \begin{description} \item[Equipment] In order to validate the design flow,TRT will buy FPGA developpement boards. The cost for these FPGA boards is estimated to 20 k\euro (6\% of the total ANR funding). \item[Personnel costs] The effort to adapt SPEAR DE to generate the input files to COACH framework is estimated to 13 \hommemois. The effort to describe and develop the application is estimated to 14 \hommemois. Finally we need one \hommemois for the partiticipation to the global specification in task 2. This is sumarized in the table below: \begin{center}\input{table_thales_full.tex}\end{center} \item[Subcontracting] No subcontracting costs. \item[Travel] The travel costs are associated to meeting, plenaries as well as participation to conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 10 k\euro. The travel costs are estimated to 5\% of the total requested ANR funding. \item[Expenses for inward billing] none \item[Other working costs] none \end{description} %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% \subsection{Partner 9: \zied} \begin{description} \item[Equipment] No equipement costs. \item[Personnel costs] The effort to define SoC architecture and adapt eFPGA interface to generate is estimated to 9.6 \hommemois. The effort to develop demonstrator and to extract eFPGA timining characteristics is estimated to 4.8 \hommemois. Finally we need one 3.6 man.month for the evaluation of the FLEXRAS solution. The table below summarizes the these manpower costs in \hommemois for the deliverables and by tasks. \begin{center}\input{table_zied_full.tex}\end{center} \item[Subcontracting] No subcontracting costs. \item[Travel] No travel costs. \item[Expenses for inward billing] none \item[Other working costs] none \end{description} %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% \subsection{Partner 10: \navtel} \begin{description} \item[Equipment] Navtel will use FPGA board with ARM processors for the validation. The costs for depreciation of the board and the instrument of test are evaluated to 7\% of the total requested ANR funding. \item[Personnel costs] A permanent engineer will be assigned on average 1/3 time for all the duration of the project. The table below shows the estimated manpower cost in \hommemois for the deliverables and by tasks. \begin{center}\input{table_navtel_full.tex}\end{center} \item[Subcontracting] No subcontracting costs. \item[Travel] The travel costs are associated to meeting, plenaries as well as participation to conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 3 k\euro. \item[Expenses for inward billing] none \item[Other working costs] none \end{description} % \begin{landscape} \begin{figure} \begin{small} \settowidth\desclen{XILINX RTL optimisation (5)} \def\resstablestyletitle#1{\parbox{\desclen}{\textit{#1}}} \begin{minipage}[b]{.47\linewidth}\center \input{table_inria_cairn_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex}\\ \irisa \vspace{2.5ex}\\ \input{table_xilinx_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex}\\ \xilinx\\ \end{minipage}\hfill\begin{minipage}[b]{.47\linewidth}\center \input{table_tima_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex} \\ \tima \end{minipage} \end{small} \caption{\label{table-livrables-1} Man power in \hommemois for the deliverables (1)} \end{figure} % \begin{figure} \begin{small} \settowidth\desclen{XILINX RTL optimisation (5)} \def\resstablestyletitle#1{\parbox{\desclen}{\textit{#1}}} \begin{minipage}[b]{.47\linewidth}\center \input{table_ubs_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex}\\ \ubs \vspace{2.5ex}\\ %\input{table_thales_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex}\\ \thales \\ \end{minipage}\hfill\begin{minipage}[b]{.47\linewidth}\center \input{table_upmc_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex} \\ \upmc \end{minipage} \end{small} \caption{\label{table-livrables-2} Man power in \hommemois for the deliverables (2)} \end{figure} \end{landscape}