source: anr/section-7.tex @ 164

Last change on this file since 164 was 164, checked in by coach, 14 years ago

IA: fin de la mise en page

File size: 12.7 KB
Line 
1\def\resstablestyletitle#1{\begin{small}{\textit{#1}}\end{small}}
2
3%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
4\subsection{Partner 1: \irisa}
5
6\begin{description}
7\item [Equipment]
8  No specific equipment acquisition.
9\item [Personnel costs] The faculty members involved in the project
10  are François Charot (INRIA researcher) Steven Derrien (associate
11  professor) and Charles Wagner (research engineer). The non-permanent
12  personal required is a PhD student that will mainly work on ASIP
13  generation. We are looking for a profile with strong informatic skills
14  and good knowledge in computer architecture.
15  \parlf
16  The table below summarizes the manpower in \hommemois by tasks for both permanent and
17  non-permanent personnels. The detail by deliverables is given in
18  figure~\ref{table-livrables-1}.
19  The non-permanent personnels costs represent \mustbecompleted{??\%} of the personnal
20  costs. The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 100\% of
21  the total ANR requested funding.
22    \begin{center}\input{table_inria_cairn_short.tex}\end{center}
23\item [Subcontracting]
24  No subcontracting costs.
25\item [Travel]
26  The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as participation to
27  conferences. The travel costs are estimated to \mustbecompleted{??\%} of the total
28  requested ANR funding.
29\item [Expenses for inward billing]
30  The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% of the total
31  requested ANR funding.
32\end{description}
33
34
35\subsection{Partner 2: \lip}
36
37\begin{description}
38\item [Equipment]
39  No specific equipment acquisition.
40\item [Personnel costs]
41  The faculty members involved in the project are an emeritus professor at ENS Lyon (Paul
42  Feautrier) and a research associate (CR2) at INRIA Rh\^one-Alpes (Christophe Alias).
43  The non-permanent personal required is a PhD student that will work on network process
44  generation from polyhedral loops, then on extensions to non-polyhedral loops.
45  We are looking for a student with both theoretical and practical skills, that will be
46  able to get a sufficient understanding of the polyhedral techniques and to produce a
47  working implementation.
48  \parlf
49  The table below summarizes the man power in \hommemois by deliverables and tasks for
50  both permanent and non-permanent personnels.
51  The non-permanent personnels costs represent \mustbecompleted{??\%} of the personnal
52  costs. The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 100\% of the total ANR
53  requested funding.
54    \begin{center}\input{table_inria_compsys_full.tex}\end{center}
55\item [Subcontracting]
56  No subcontracting costs.
57\item [Travel]
58  The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as participation to
59  conferences. The travel costs are estimated to \mustbecompleted{??\%} of the total
60  requested ANR funding.
61\item [Expenses for inward billing]
62  The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% of the total
63  requested ANR funding.
64\end{description}
65
66%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
67\subsection{Partner 3: \tima}
68
69\begin{description}
70\item [Equipment]
71  No specific equipment acquisition.
72\item [Personnel costs]
73  The permanent personnels involved in the project are professor and assistant professor
74  (Fr\'ed\'eric P\'etrot and Olivier Muller).
75  The non permanent personnels are Phd students and post-doc researchers.
76  Related costs are estimated in \hommemois.
77  One phd student (Adrien Prost-Boucle), funded by the french ministry of research, will
78  be working on the project.
79  One 100\% funded phd student will be hired in september 2010. A post-doc researcher will
80  be hired at the end of 2011 for one year and an half.
81  The PhD student will mainly work on the evolution of UGH HLS tool. Thus, we are looking
82  for a profile with strong informatic skills and good knowledge in computer architecture.
83  The post-doc will mainly work on dynamic reconfiguration and HPC. The required profile
84  will be more oriented on computer architecture and advanced digital design.
85  \parlf
86  The table below sumarizes the man power in \hommemois by tasks for both permanent and
87  non-permanent personnels. The detail by deliverables is given in
88  figure~\ref{table-livrables-1}.
89  The requested funding for personnels represent 50\% of the total personnal costs.
90  The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 85\% of the total ANR requested
91  funding.
92    \begin{center}\input{table_tima_short.tex}\end{center}
93\item [Subcontracting]
94  No subcontracting costs.
95\item [Travel]
96  The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as participation to
97  conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 11\% of the total requested ANR funding.
98\item [Expenses for inward billing]
99  The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% of the total
100  requested ANR funding.
101\end{description}
102
103%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
104\subsection{Partner 4: \ubs}
105
106\begin {description}
107\item [Equipment]
108  In order to validate the design flow project, the LabSTICC  laboratory will buy FPGA
109  developpement boards.  The cost for these FPGA boards is estimated to 3\% of the total
110  ANR funding.
111\item [Personnel costs]
112  The faculty members involved in the project are associate professors (Philippe COUSSY,
113  Cyrille CHAVET) or research engineers (Dominique HELLER). All non-permanent personnel
114  costs are estimated in \hommemois for senior researchers (post-doc or research
115  engineers).
116  \parlf
117  The table below sumarizes the man power in \hommemois by tasks for both permanent and
118  non-permanent personnels. The detail by deliverables is given in
119  figure~\ref{table-livrables-2}.
120  The non-permanent personnels costs represent 50\% of the personnal costs.
121  The requested funding for non permanent personnels is about 83\% of the total ANR
122  requested funding.
123    \begin{center}\input{table_ubs_short.tex}\end{center}
124\item [Subcontracting]
125  No subcontracting costs.
126\item [Travel]
127  The travel costs are associated to management and meeting as well as participation to
128  conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 10\% of the total requested ANR funding.
129\item [Expenses for inward billing]
130  The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% of the total
131  requested ANR funding.
132\end {description}
133
134
135%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
136\subsection{Partner 5: \upmc}
137
138\begin{description}
139\item[Equipment]
140    No specific equipment acquisition is required for this project.
141    The costs for depreciation of workstations and pre-existing FPGA boards are evaluated
142    to 7\% of the total requested ANR funding.
143\item[Personnel costs]
144    The permanent personnels involved in the project are professors or assistant
145    processors (Alain Greiner and Ivan Aug\'e).
146    All non permanent personnel costs are estimated in \hommemois for senior researchers
147    (post-doc or research engineers).
148    The table below sumarizes the man power by tasks in \hommemois for both permanent  and
149    non-permanent personnels.
150    The detail by deliverables is given in figure~\ref{table-livrables-2}.
151    The non-permanent personnels costs represent 50\% of the personnal costs.
152    The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 79\% of the total ANR
153    requested funding.
154    \begin{center}\input{table_upmc_short.tex}\end{center}
155\item[Subcontracting]
156    No subcontracting costs.
157\item[Travel]
158    The travel costs are associated to management and coordination meeting as
159    well as participation to conferences. The travel costs are estimated
160    to 10\% of the total requested ANR funding.
161\item[Expenses for inward billing]
162    The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\%
163    of the total requested ANR funding.
164\end{description}
165
166%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
167\subsection{Partner 6: \xilinx}
168
169\begin{description}
170\item[Equipment]
171  No specific equipment acquisition is required for this project.
172\item[Personnel costs]
173  \xilinx employees involved in the project are permanent Software Engineers.
174  The man power detail in \hommemois by deliverables is given in
175  figure~\ref{table-livrables-1} and a sumary by task in the following table.
176  \begin{center}\input{table_xilinx_short.tex}\end{center}
177\item[Subcontracting]
178  No subcontracting costs.
179\item[Travel]
180  The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as participation to
181  conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 2\% of the total requested ANR funding.
182\item[Expenses for inward billing] none
183\item[Other working costs] none
184\end{description}
185
186%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
187\subsection{Partner 7: \bull}
188
189\begin{description}
190\item[Equipment]
191    Acquisition of a FPGA development board will represent the main equipment cost for
192    Bull in COACH. It is estimated at about 5\% (tbc) of the total funding.
193\item[Personnel costs]
194    A permanent engineer will be assigned full time to the project for a duration of 20
195    months as shown in the table below that gives the man power in \hommemois:
196    \begin{center}\input{table_bull_full.tex}\end{center}
197\item[Subcontracting]
198    No subcontracting costs.
199\item[Travel]
200    Application of a standard 10\% of the total funding to travel costs.
201\item[Expenses for inward billing]
202    Costs justified by inward billing are estimated to about 5\% of the total funding.
203\item[Other working costs] none
204\end{description}
205
206
207%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
208\subsection{Partner 8: \thales}
209
210\begin{description}
211\item[Equipment]
212    In order to validate the design flow,TRT will buy FPGA developpement boards. The cost
213    for these FPGA boards is estimated to 20 k\euro (6\% of the total ANR funding).
214\item[Personnel costs]
215    The effort to adapt SPEAR DE to generate the input files to COACH framework is
216    estimated to 13 \hommemois.
217    The effort to describe and develop the application is estimated to 14 \hommemois.
218    Finally we need one \hommemois for the partiticipation to the global specification in task 2.
219    This is sumarized in the table below:
220    \begin{center}\input{table_thales_full.tex}\end{center}
221\item[Subcontracting]
222    No subcontracting costs.
223\item[Travel]
224    The travel costs are associated to meeting, plenaries as well as participation to
225    conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 10 k\euro. The travel costs are estimated to
226    5\% of the total requested ANR funding.
227\item[Expenses for inward billing] none
228\item[Other working costs] none
229\end{description}
230
231%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
232\subsection{Partner 9: \zied}
233
234  \begin{center}\input{table_zied_full.tex}\end{center}
235
236%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
237\subsection{Partner 10: \navtel}
238
239\begin{description}
240\item[Equipment]
241    Navtel will use FPGA board with ARM processors for the validation.
242    The costs for depreciation of the board and the instrument of test
243    are evaluated to 7\% of the total requested ANR funding.
244\item[Personnel costs]
245    A permanent engineer will be assigned on average 1/3 time for
246        all the duration of the project.
247    The table below shows the estimated manpower cost in \hommemois for the deliverables.
248    \begin{center}\input{table_navtel_full.tex}\end{center}
249\item[Subcontracting]
250    No subcontracting costs.
251\item[Travel]
252    The travel costs are associated to meeting, plenaries as well as participation to
253    conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 3 k\euro.
254\item[Expenses for inward billing] none
255\item[Other working costs] none
256\end{description}
257%
258\begin{landscape}
259\begin{figure}
260\begin{small}
261\settowidth\desclen{XILINX RTL optimisation (5)}
262\def\resstablestyletitle#1{\parbox{\desclen}{\textit{#1}}}
263\begin{minipage}[b]{.47\linewidth}\center
264\input{table_inria_cairn_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex}\\  \irisa  \vspace{2.5ex}\\
265\input{table_xilinx_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex}\\       \xilinx\\
266\end{minipage}\hfill\begin{minipage}[b]{.47\linewidth}\center
267\input{table_tima_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex} \\ \tima
268\end{minipage}
269\end{small}
270\caption{\label{table-livrables-1} Man power in \hommemois for the deliverables (1)}
271\end{figure}
272%
273\begin{figure}
274\begin{small}
275\settowidth\desclen{XILINX RTL optimisation (5)}
276\def\resstablestyletitle#1{\parbox{\desclen}{\textit{#1}}}
277\begin{minipage}[b]{.47\linewidth}\center
278\input{table_ubs_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex}\\     \ubs    \vspace{2.5ex}\\
279%\input{table_thales_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex}\\  \thales \\
280\end{minipage}\hfill\begin{minipage}[b]{.47\linewidth}\center
281\input{table_upmc_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex} \\   \upmc
282\end{minipage}
283\end{small}
284\caption{\label{table-livrables-2} Man power in \hommemois for the deliverables (2)}
285\end{figure}
286\end{landscape}
Note: See TracBrowser for help on using the repository browser.