source: anr/section-7.tex @ 226

Last change on this file since 226 was 197, checked in by coach, 14 years ago

UBS

File size: 13.4 KB
Line 
1\def\resstablestyletitle#1{\begin{small}{\textit{#1}}\end{small}}
2
3%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
4\subsection{Partner 1: \irisa}
5
6\begin{description}
7\item [Equipment]
8  No specific equipment acquisition.
9\item [Personnel costs] The faculty members involved in the project
10  are François Charot (INRIA researcher) Steven Derrien (associate
11  professor) and Charles Wagner (research engineer). The non-permanent
12  personal required is a PhD student that will mainly work on ASIP
13  generation. We are looking for a profile with strong informatic skills
14  and good knowledge in computer architecture.
15  \parlf
16  The table below summarizes the manpower in \hommemois by tasks for both permanent and
17  non-permanent personnels. The detail by deliverables is given in
18  figure~\ref{table-livrables-1}.
19  The non-permanent personnels costs represent \mustbecompleted{??\%} of the personnal
20  costs. The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 100\% of
21  the total ANR requested funding.
22    \begin{center}\input{table_inria_cairn_short.tex}\end{center}
23\item [Subcontracting]
24  No subcontracting costs.
25\item [Travel]
26  The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as participation to
27  conferences. The travel costs are estimated to \mustbecompleted{??\%} of the total
28  requested ANR funding.
29\item [Expenses for inward billing]
30  The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% of the total
31  requested ANR funding.
32\end{description}
33
34
35\subsection{Partner 2: \lip}
36
37\begin{description}
38\item [Equipment]
39  No specific equipment acquisition. The costs for depreciation of
40  workstations is evaluated to 4\% of the total requested ANR funding.
41\item [Personnel costs]
42  The faculty members involved in the project are an emeritus
43  professor at ENS Lyon (Paul Feautrier) and a research associate
44  (CR2) at INRIA Rh\^one-Alpes (Christophe Alias).  The non-permanent
45  personel required is a PhD student that will work on network process
46  generation from polyhedral loops, then on extensions to
47  non-polyhedral loops.  We are looking for a student with both
48  theoretical and practical skills, that will be able to get a
49  sufficient understanding of the polyhedral techniques and to produce
50  a working implementation.
51  \parlf
52  The table below summarizes the \hommemois by
53  deliverables and tasks for both permanent and non-permanent
54  personnels.  The non-permanent personnels costs represent 23\% of
55  the personnal costs. The requested funding for non
56  permanent personnels is 100\% of the total ANR requested funding.
57  \begin{center}\input{table_inria_compsys_full.tex}\end{center}
58\item [Subcontracting]
59  No subcontracting costs.
60\item [Travel]
61  The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as
62  participation to conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 20\%
63  of the total requested ANR funding.
64\item [Expenses for inward billing]
65  The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated
66  to 4\% of the total requested ANR funding.
67\end{description}
68
69%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
70\subsection{Partner 3: \tima}
71
72\begin{description}
73\item [Equipment]
74  No specific equipment acquisition.
75\item [Personnel costs]
76  The permanent personnels involved in the project are professor and assistant professor
77  (Fr\'ed\'eric P\'etrot and Olivier Muller).
78  The non permanent personnels are Phd students and post-doc researchers.
79  Related costs are estimated in \hommemois.
80  One phd student (Adrien Prost-Boucle), funded by the french ministry of research, will
81  be working on the project.
82  One 100\% funded phd student will be hired in september 2010. A post-doc researcher will
83  be hired at the end of 2011 for one year and an half.
84  The PhD student will mainly work on the evolution of UGH HLS tool. Thus, we are looking
85  for a profile with strong informatic skills and good knowledge in computer architecture.
86  The post-doc will mainly work on dynamic reconfiguration and HPC. The required profile
87  will be more oriented on computer architecture and advanced digital design.
88  \parlf
89  The table below sumarizes the man power in \hommemois by tasks for both permanent and
90  non-permanent personnels. The detail by deliverables is given in
91  figure~\ref{table-livrables-1}.
92  The requested funding for personnels represent 50\% of the total personnal costs.
93  The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 85\% of the total ANR requested
94  funding.
95    \begin{center}\input{table_tima_short.tex}\end{center}
96\item [Subcontracting]
97  No subcontracting costs.
98\item [Travel]
99  The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as participation to
100  conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 11\% of the total requested ANR funding.
101\item [Expenses for inward billing]
102  The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% of the total
103  requested ANR funding.
104\end{description}
105
106%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
107\subsection{Partner 4: \ubs}
108
109\begin {description}
110\item [Equipment]
111  In order to validate the design flow project, the Lab-STICC laboratory will buy FPGA
112  developpement boards.  The cost for these FPGA boards is estimated to 3\% of the total
113  ANR funding.
114\item [Personnel costs]
115  The faculty members involved in the project are associate professors (Philippe COUSSY,
116  Cyrille CHAVET) or research engineers (Dominique HELLER). All non-permanent personnel
117  costs are estimated in \hommemois for senior researchers (post-doc or research
118  engineers).
119  \parlf
120  The table below sumarizes the man power in \hommemois by tasks for both permanent and
121  non-permanent personnels. The detail by deliverables is given in
122  figure~\ref{table-livrables-2}.
123  The non-permanent personnels costs represent 50\% of the personnal costs.
124  The requested funding for non permanent personnels is about 83\% of the total ANR
125  requested funding.
126    \begin{center}\input{table_ubs_short.tex}\end{center}
127\item [Subcontracting]
128  No subcontracting costs.
129\item [Travel]
130  The travel costs are associated to management and meeting as well as participation to
131  conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 10\% of the total requested ANR funding.
132\item [Expenses for inward billing]
133  The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% of the total
134  requested ANR funding.
135\end {description}
136
137
138%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
139\subsection{Partner 5: \upmc}
140
141\begin{description}
142\item[Equipment]
143    No specific equipment acquisition is required for this project.
144    The costs for depreciation of workstations and pre-existing FPGA boards are evaluated
145    to 7\% of the total requested ANR funding.
146\item[Personnel costs]
147    The permanent personnels involved in the project are professors or assistant
148    processors (Alain Greiner and Ivan Aug\'e).
149    All non permanent personnel costs are estimated in \hommemois for senior researchers
150    (post-doc or research engineers).
151    The table below sumarizes the man power by tasks in \hommemois for both permanent  and
152    non-permanent personnels.
153    The detail by deliverables is given in figure~\ref{table-livrables-2}.
154    The non-permanent personnels costs represent 50\% of the personnal costs.
155    The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 79\% of the total ANR
156    requested funding.
157    \begin{center}\input{table_upmc_short.tex}\end{center}
158\item[Subcontracting]
159    No subcontracting costs.
160\item[Travel]
161    The travel costs are associated to management and coordination meeting as
162    well as participation to conferences. The travel costs are estimated
163    to 10\% of the total requested ANR funding.
164\item[Expenses for inward billing]
165    The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\%
166    of the total requested ANR funding.
167\end{description}
168
169%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
170\subsection{Partner 6: \xilinx}
171
172\begin{description}
173\item[Equipment]
174  No specific equipment acquisition is required for this project.
175\item[Personnel costs]
176  \xilinx employees involved in the project are permanent Software Engineers.
177  The man power detail in \hommemois by deliverables is given in
178  figure~\ref{table-livrables-1} and a sumary by task in the following table.
179  \begin{center}\input{table_xilinx_short.tex}\end{center}
180\item[Subcontracting]
181  No subcontracting costs.
182\item[Travel]
183  The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as participation to
184  conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 2\% of the total requested ANR funding.
185\item[Expenses for inward billing] none
186\item[Other working costs] none
187\end{description}
188
189%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
190\subsection{Partner 7: \bull}
191
192\begin{description}
193\item[Equipment]
194    Acquisition of a FPGA development board will represent the main equipment cost for
195    Bull in COACH. It is estimated at about 5\% (tbc) of the total funding.
196\item[Personnel costs]
197    A permanent engineer will be assigned full time to the project for a duration of 20
198    months as shown in the table below that gives the man power in \hommemois:
199    \begin{center}\input{table_bull_full.tex}\end{center}
200\item[Subcontracting]
201    No subcontracting costs.
202\item[Travel]
203    Application of a standard 10\% of the total funding to travel costs.
204\item[Expenses for inward billing]
205    Costs justified by inward billing are estimated to about 5\% of the total funding.
206\item[Other working costs] none
207\end{description}
208
209
210%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
211\subsection{Partner 8: \thales}
212
213\begin{description}
214\item[Equipment]
215    In order to validate the design flow,TRT will buy FPGA developpement boards. The cost
216    for these FPGA boards is estimated to 20 k\euro (6\% of the total ANR funding).
217\item[Personnel costs]
218    The effort to adapt SPEAR DE to generate the input files to COACH framework is
219    estimated to 13 \hommemois.
220    The effort to describe and develop the application is estimated to 14 \hommemois.
221    Finally we need one \hommemois for the partiticipation to the global specification in task 2.
222    This is sumarized in the table below:
223    \begin{center}\input{table_thales_full.tex}\end{center}
224\item[Subcontracting]
225    No subcontracting costs.
226\item[Travel]
227    The travel costs are associated to meeting, plenaries as well as participation to
228    conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 10 k\euro. The travel costs are estimated to
229    5\% of the total requested ANR funding.
230\item[Expenses for inward billing] none
231\item[Other working costs] none
232\end{description}
233
234%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
235\subsection{Partner 9: \zied}
236
237\begin{description}
238\item[Equipment]
239    No equipement costs.
240\item[Personnel costs]
241    The effort to define SoC architecture and adapt eFPGA interface to generate is
242    estimated to 9.6 \hommemois.
243    The effort to develop demonstrator and to extract eFPGA timining characteristics is
244    estimated to 4.8 \hommemois.
245    Finally we need one 3.6 man.month for the evaluation of the FLEXRAS solution.
246    The table below summarizes the these manpower costs in \hommemois for the deliverables
247    and by tasks.
248    \begin{center}\input{table_zied_full.tex}\end{center}
249\item[Subcontracting]
250    No subcontracting costs.
251\item[Travel]
252    No travel costs.
253\item[Expenses for inward billing] none
254\item[Other working costs] none
255\end{description}
256
257%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
258\subsection{Partner 10: \navtel}
259
260\begin{description}
261\item[Equipment]
262    Navtel will use FPGA board with ARM processors for the validation.
263    The costs for depreciation of the board and the instrument of test
264    are evaluated to 7\% of the total requested ANR funding.
265\item[Personnel costs]
266    A permanent engineer will be assigned on average 1/3 time for
267        all the duration of the project.
268    The table below shows the estimated manpower cost in \hommemois for the deliverables
269    and by tasks.
270    \begin{center}\input{table_navtel_full.tex}\end{center}
271\item[Subcontracting]
272    No subcontracting costs.
273\item[Travel]
274    The travel costs are associated to meeting, plenaries as well as participation to
275    conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 3 k\euro.
276\item[Expenses for inward billing] none
277\item[Other working costs] none
278\end{description}
279%
280\begin{landscape}
281\begin{figure}
282\begin{small}
283\settowidth\desclen{XILINX RTL optimisation (5)}
284\def\resstablestyletitle#1{\parbox{\desclen}{\textit{#1}}}
285\begin{minipage}[b]{.47\linewidth}\center
286\input{table_inria_cairn_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex}\\  \irisa  \vspace{2.5ex}\\
287\input{table_xilinx_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex}\\       \xilinx\\
288\end{minipage}\hfill\begin{minipage}[b]{.47\linewidth}\center
289\input{table_tima_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex} \\ \tima
290\end{minipage}
291\end{small}
292\caption{\label{table-livrables-1} Man power in \hommemois for the deliverables (1)}
293\end{figure}
294%
295\begin{figure}
296\begin{small}
297\settowidth\desclen{XILINX RTL optimisation (5)}
298\def\resstablestyletitle#1{\parbox{\desclen}{\textit{#1}}}
299\begin{minipage}[b]{.47\linewidth}\center
300\input{table_ubs_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex}\\     \ubs    \vspace{2.5ex}\\
301%\input{table_thales_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex}\\  \thales \\
302\end{minipage}\hfill\begin{minipage}[b]{.47\linewidth}\center
303\input{table_upmc_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex} \\   \upmc
304\end{minipage}
305\end{small}
306\caption{\label{table-livrables-2} Man power in \hommemois for the deliverables (2)}
307\end{figure}
308\end{landscape}
Note: See TracBrowser for help on using the repository browser.