source: anr/section-ressources.tex @ 298

Last change on this file since 298 was 290, checked in by coach, 14 years ago

Fixed miss spellings.

  • Property svn:eol-style set to native
  • Property svn:keywords set to Revision HeadURL Id Date
File size: 13.6 KB
Line 
1\anrdoc{On présentera ici la justification scientifique et technique des moyens
2demandés dans le document de soumission A par chaque partenaire et
3synthétisés à l'échelle du projet dans la fiche «Tableaux récapitulatifs»
4du document de soumission A.\\
5Chaque partenaire justifiera les moyens qu'il demande en distinguant les
6différents postes de dépenses.\\
7Pour chaque partenaire on precisera:
8\begin{itemize}
9\item Equipment: 1) Préciser la nature des équipements* et justifier le
10    choix des équipements. 2) Si nécessaire, préciser la part de financement
11    demandé sur le projet et si les achats envisagés doivent être complétés
12    par d'autres sources de financement. Si tel est le cas, indiquer le
13    montant et l'origine de ces financements complémentaires.\\
14    * Attention: Un devis sera demandé si le projet est retenu pour
15    financement.
16\item Personnel costs
17    1) Le personnel non permanent (thÚses, post- doctorants,CDD...)
18    financé sur le projet devra être justifié.
19    2) Fournir  les profils des postes à pourvoir pour les personnels à
20    recruter (1/2 page maximum par type de poste)
21    3) Pour les thÚses, préciser si des demandes de bourse de thÚse sont
22    prévues ou en cours, en préciser la nature et la part de financement
23    imputable au projet.
24\item Subcontracting. Préciser: 1) la nature des prestations
25    2) le type de prestataire.
26\item Travel.  Préciser: 1) les missions liées aux travaux d'acquisition
27    sur le terrain (campagnes de mesures),
28    2) les missions relevant de colloques, congrÚs.
29\item Costs justified by internal procedures of invoicing. Préciser la nature
30      des prestations.
31\item Other expense. Toute dépense significative relevant de ce poste
32      devra être justifiée.
33\end{itemize}}
34
35\def\resstablestyletitle#1{\begin{small}{\textit{#1}}\end{small}}
36
37%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
38\subsection{Partner 1: \irisa}
39
40\begin{description}
41\item [Equipment]
42  No specific equipment acquisition.
43\item [Personnel costs] The faculty members involved in the project
44  are François Charot (INRIA researcher), Steven Derrien (associate
45  professor), Christophe Wolinski (professor) and Charles Wagner
46  (research engineer). The non-permanent personal required is a PhD
47  student that will mainly work on ASIP generation. We are looking for
48  a profile with strong informatic skills and good knowledge in
49  computer architecture.
50  \parlf
51  The table below summarizes the manpower in \hommemois by tasks for both permanent and
52  non-permanent personnels. The detail by deliverables is given in
53  figure~\ref{table-livrables-1}.
54  The non-permanent personnels costs represent {48\%} of the personnal
55  costs. The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 100\% of
56  the total ANR requested funding.
57    \begin{center}\input{table_inria_cairn_short.tex}\end{center}
58\item [Subcontracting]
59  No subcontracting costs.
60\item [Travel]
61  The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as participation to
62  conferences. The travel costs are estimated to {7,5\%} of the total
63  requested ANR funding.
64\item [Expenses for inward billing]
65  The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% of the total
66  requested ANR funding.
67\end{description}
68
69
70\subsection{Partner 2: \lip}
71
72\begin{description}
73\item [Equipment]
74  No specific equipment acquisition. The costs for depreciation of
75  workstations is evaluated to 4\% of the total requested ANR funding.
76\item [Personnel costs]
77  The faculty members involved in the project are an emeritus
78  professor at ENS Lyon (Paul Feautrier) and a research associate
79  (CR2) at INRIA Rh\^one-Alpes (Christophe Alias).  The non-permanent
80  personel required is a PhD student that will work on network process
81  generation from polyhedral loops, then on extensions to
82  non-polyhedral loops.  We are looking for a student with both
83  theoretical and practical skills, that will be able to get a
84  sufficient understanding of the polyhedral techniques and to produce
85  a working implementation.
86  \parlf
87  The table below summarizes the \hommemois by
88  deliverables and tasks for both permanent and non-permanent
89  personnels.  The non-permanent personnels costs represent 26\% of
90  the personnal costs. The requested funding for non
91  permanent personnels is 100\% of the total ANR requested funding.
92  \begin{center}\input{table_inria_compsys_full.tex}\end{center}
93\item [Subcontracting]
94  No subcontracting costs.
95\item [Travel]
96  The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as
97  participation to conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 20\%
98  of the total requested ANR funding.
99\item [Expenses for inward billing]
100  The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated
101  to 4\% of the total requested ANR funding.
102\end{description}
103
104%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
105\subsection{Partner 3: \tima}
106
107\begin{description}
108\item [Equipment]
109  No specific equipment acquisition.
110\item [Personnel costs]
111  The permanent personnels involved in the project are professor and assistant professor
112  (Fr\'ed\'eric P\'etrot and Olivier Muller).
113  The non permanent personnels are Phd students and post-doc researchers.
114  Related costs are estimated in \hommemois.
115  One phd student (Adrien Prost-Boucle), funded by the french ministry of research, will
116  be working on the project.
117  One 100\% funded phd student will be hired in september 2010. A post-doc researcher will
118  be hired at the end of 2011 for one year and an half.
119  The PhD student will mainly work on the evolution of UGH HLS tool. Thus, we are looking
120  for a profile with strong informatic skills and good knowledge in computer architecture.
121  The post-doc will mainly work on dynamic reconfiguration and HPC. The required profile
122  will be more oriented on computer architecture and advanced digital design.
123  \parlf
124  The table below sumarizes the man power in \hommemois by tasks for both permanent and
125  non-permanent personnels. The detail by deliverables is given in
126  figure~\ref{table-livrables-1}.
127  The requested funding for personnels represent 50\% of the total personnal costs.
128  The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 85\% of the total ANR requested
129  funding.
130    \begin{center}\input{table_tima_short.tex}\end{center}
131\item [Subcontracting]
132  No subcontracting costs.
133\item [Travel]
134  The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as participation to
135  conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 11\% of the total requested ANR funding.
136\item [Expenses for inward billing]
137  The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% of the total
138  requested ANR funding.
139\end{description}
140
141%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
142\subsection{Partner 4: \ubs}
143
144\begin {description}
145\item [Equipment]
146  In order to validate the design flow project, the Lab-STICC laboratory will buy FPGA
147  developpement boards.  The cost for these FPGA boards is estimated to 3\% of the total
148  ANR funding.
149\item [Personnel costs]
150  The faculty members involved in the project are associate professors (Philippe COUSSY,
151  Cyrille CHAVET) or research engineers (Dominique HELLER). All non-permanent personnel
152  costs are estimated in \hommemois for senior researchers (post-doc or research
153  engineers).
154  \parlf
155  The table below sumarizes the man power in \hommemois by tasks for both permanent and
156  non-permanent personnels. The detail by deliverables is given in
157  figure~\ref{table-livrables-2}.
158  The non-permanent personnels costs represent 50\% of the personnal costs.
159  The requested funding for non permanent personnels is about 83\% of the total ANR
160  requested funding.
161    \begin{center}\input{table_ubs_short.tex}\end{center}
162\item [Subcontracting]
163  No subcontracting costs.
164\item [Travel]
165  The travel costs are associated to management and meeting as well as participation to
166  conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 10\% of the total requested ANR funding.
167\item [Expenses for inward billing]
168  The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% of the total
169  requested ANR funding.
170\end {description}
171
172
173%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
174\subsection{Partner 5: \upmc}
175
176\begin{description}
177\item[Equipment]
178    No specific equipment acquisition is required for this project.
179    The costs for depreciation of workstations and pre-existing FPGA boards are evaluated
180    to 7\% of the total requested ANR funding.
181\item[Personnel costs]
182    The permanent personnels involved in the project are professors or assistant
183    processors (Alain Greiner and Ivan Aug\'e).
184    All non permanent personnel costs are estimated in \hommemois for senior researchers
185    (post-doc or research engineers).
186    The table below sumarizes the man power by tasks in \hommemois for both permanent  and
187    non-permanent personnels.
188    The detail by deliverables is given in figure~\ref{table-livrables-2}.
189    The non-permanent personnels costs represent 50\% of the personnal costs.
190    The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 79\% of the total ANR
191    requested funding.
192    \begin{center}\input{table_upmc_short.tex}\end{center}
193\item[Subcontracting]
194    No subcontracting costs.
195\item[Travel]
196    The travel costs are associated to management and coordination meeting as
197    well as participation to conferences. The travel costs are estimated
198    to 10\% of the total requested ANR funding.
199\item[Expenses for inward billing]
200    The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\%
201    of the total requested ANR funding.
202\end{description}
203
204%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
205\subsection{Partner 6: \mdslong}
206
207\mustbecompleted{A COMPLETER: Emmanuel ....}
208\begin{ADDEDENV}
209\begin{description}
210\item[Equipment]
211  No specific equipment acquisition is required for this project.
212\item[Personnel costs]
213  \xilinx employees involved in the project are permanent Software Engineers.
214  The man power detail in \hommemois by deliverables is given in
215  figure~\ref{table-livrables-1} and a sumary by task in the following table.
216  \begin{center}\input{table_mds_short.tex}\end{center}
217\item[Subcontracting]
218  No subcontracting costs.
219\item[Travel]
220  The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as participation to
221  conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 2\% of the total requested ANR funding.
222\item[Expenses for inward billing] none
223\item[Other working costs] none
224\end{description}
225\end{ADDEDENV}
226
227%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
228\subsection{Partner 7: \bull}
229
230\begin{description}
231\item[Equipment]
232    Acquisition of a FPGA development board will represent the main equipment cost for
233    Bull in COACH. It is estimated at about 5\% (tbc) of the total funding.
234\item[Personnel costs]
235    A permanent engineer will be assigned full time to the project for a duration of 20
236    months as shown in the table below that gives the man power in \hommemois:
237    \begin{center}\input{table_bull_full.tex}\end{center}
238\item[Subcontracting]
239    No subcontracting costs.
240\item[Travel]
241    Application of a standard 10\% of the total funding to travel costs.
242\item[Expenses for inward billing]
243    Costs justified by inward billing are estimated to about 5\% of the total funding.
244\item[Other working costs] none
245\end{description}
246
247
248%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
249\subsection{Partner 8: \thales}
250
251\begin{description}
252\item[Equipment]
253    In order to validate the design flow,TRT will buy FPGA developpement boards. The cost
254    for these FPGA boards is estimated to 10 k\euro (6\% of the total ANR funding).
255\item[Personnel costs]
256    The effort to adapt SPEAR DE to generate the input files to COACH framework is
257    estimated to 13 \hommemois.
258    The effort to describe and develop the application is estimated to 14 \hommemois.
259    Finally we need one \hommemois for the partiticipation to the global specification in task 2.
260    This is sumarized in the table below:
261    \begin{center}\input{table_thales_full.tex}\end{center}
262\item[Subcontracting]
263    No subcontracting costs.
264\item[Travel]
265    The travel costs are associated to meeting, plenaries as well as participation to
266    conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 10 k\euro. The travel costs are estimated to
267    5\% of the total requested ANR funding.
268\item[Expenses for inward billing] none
269\item[Other working costs] none
270\end{description}
271
272%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
273%
274\begin{landscape}
275\begin{figure}
276\begin{small}
277\settowidth\desclen{XILINX RTL optimisation (5)}
278\def\resstablestyletitle#1{\parbox{\desclen}{\textit{#1}}}
279\begin{minipage}[b]{.47\linewidth}\center
280\input{table_inria_cairn_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex}\\  \irisa  \vspace{2.5ex}\\
281\input{table_mds_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex}\\       \mds \\
282\end{minipage}\hfill\begin{minipage}[b]{.47\linewidth}\center
283\input{table_tima_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex} \\ \tima
284\end{minipage}
285\end{small}
286\caption{\label{table-livrables-1} Man power in \hommemois for the deliverables (1)}
287\end{figure}
288%
289\begin{figure}
290\begin{small}
291\settowidth\desclen{XILINX RTL optimisation (5)}
292\def\resstablestyletitle#1{\parbox{\desclen}{\textit{#1}}}
293\begin{minipage}[b]{.47\linewidth}\center
294\input{table_ubs_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex}\\     \ubs    \vspace{2.5ex}\\
295%\input{table_thales_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex}\\  \thales \\
296\end{minipage}\hfill\begin{minipage}[b]{.47\linewidth}\center
297\input{table_upmc_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex} \\   \upmc
298\end{minipage}
299\end{small}
300\caption{\label{table-livrables-2} Man power in \hommemois for the deliverables (2)}
301\end{figure}
302\end{landscape}
Note: See TracBrowser for help on using the repository browser.