1 | \anrdoc{On présentera ici la justification scientifique et technique des moyens |
---|
2 | demandés dans le document de soumission A par chaque partenaire et |
---|
3 | synthétisés à l'échelle du projet dans la fiche «Tableaux récapitulatifs» |
---|
4 | du document de soumission A.\\ |
---|
5 | Chaque partenaire justifiera les moyens qu'il demande en distinguant les |
---|
6 | différents postes de dépenses.\\ |
---|
7 | Pour chaque partenaire on precisera: |
---|
8 | \begin{itemize} |
---|
9 | \item Equipment: 1) Préciser la nature des équipements* et justifier le |
---|
10 | choix des équipements. 2) Si nécessaire, préciser la part de financement |
---|
11 | demandé sur le projet et si les achats envisagés doivent être complétés |
---|
12 | par d'autres sources de financement. Si tel est le cas, indiquer le |
---|
13 | montant et l'origine de ces financements complémentaires.\\ |
---|
14 | * Attention: Un devis sera demandé si le projet est retenu pour |
---|
15 | financement. |
---|
16 | \item Personnel costs |
---|
17 | 1) Le personnel non permanent (thÚses, post- doctorants,CDD...) |
---|
18 | financé sur le projet devra être justifié. |
---|
19 | 2) Fournir les profils des postes à pourvoir pour les personnels à |
---|
20 | recruter (1/2 page maximum par type de poste) |
---|
21 | 3) Pour les thÚses, préciser si des demandes de bourse de thÚse sont |
---|
22 | prévues ou en cours, en préciser la nature et la part de financement |
---|
23 | imputable au projet. |
---|
24 | \item Subcontracting. Préciser: 1) la nature des prestations |
---|
25 | 2) le type de prestataire. |
---|
26 | \item Travel. Préciser: 1) les missions liées aux travaux d'acquisition |
---|
27 | sur le terrain (campagnes de mesures), |
---|
28 | 2) les missions relevant de colloques, congrÚs. |
---|
29 | \item Costs justified by internal procedures of invoicing. Préciser la nature |
---|
30 | des prestations. |
---|
31 | \item Other expense. Toute dépense significative relevant de ce poste |
---|
32 | devra être justifiée. |
---|
33 | \end{itemize}} |
---|
34 | |
---|
35 | \def\resstablestyletitle#1{\begin{small}{\textit{#1}}\end{small}} |
---|
36 | |
---|
37 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
---|
38 | \subsection{Partner 1: \inria} |
---|
39 | |
---|
40 | \begin{description} |
---|
41 | \item [Equipment] |
---|
42 | No specific equipment acquisition. |
---|
43 | \item [Personnel costs] The faculty members involved in the project |
---|
44 | are François Charot (INRIA researcher), Steven Derrien (associate |
---|
45 | professor), Christophe Wolinski (professor) and Charles Wagner |
---|
46 | (research engineer). The non-permanent personal required is a PhD |
---|
47 | student that will mainly work on ASIP generation. We are looking for |
---|
48 | a profile with strong informatic skills and good knowledge in |
---|
49 | computer architecture. |
---|
50 | \parlf |
---|
51 | The table below summarizes the manpower in \hommemois by tasks for both permanent and |
---|
52 | non-permanent personnels. The detail by deliverables is given in |
---|
53 | figure~\ref{table-livrables-1}. |
---|
54 | The non-permanent personnels costs represent {48\%} of the personnal |
---|
55 | costs. The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 100\% of |
---|
56 | the total ANR requested funding. |
---|
57 | \begin{center}\input{table_inria_cairn_short.tex}\end{center} |
---|
58 | \item [Subcontracting] |
---|
59 | No subcontracting costs. |
---|
60 | \item [Travel] |
---|
61 | The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as participation to |
---|
62 | conferences. The travel costs are estimated to {7,5\%} of the total |
---|
63 | requested ANR funding. |
---|
64 | \item [Expenses for inward billing] |
---|
65 | The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% of the total |
---|
66 | requested ANR funding. |
---|
67 | \end{description} |
---|
68 | |
---|
69 | |
---|
70 | \subsection{Partner 2: \lip} |
---|
71 | |
---|
72 | \begin{description} |
---|
73 | \item [Equipment] |
---|
74 | No specific equipment acquisition. The costs for depreciation of |
---|
75 | workstations is evaluated to 4\% of the total requested ANR funding. |
---|
76 | \item [Personnel costs] |
---|
77 | The faculty members involved in the project are Christophe Alias |
---|
78 | (INRIA researcher) and Paul Feautrier (emeritus professor at |
---|
79 | ENS-Lyon). The non-permanent personel required is a post-doc that |
---|
80 | will work on FIFO construction, then on extensions of process |
---|
81 | construction and memory optimization to non-polyhedral loops. We |
---|
82 | are looking for a candidate with both theoretical and practical |
---|
83 | skills, that will be able to get a sufficient understanding of the |
---|
84 | polyhedral techniques to produce a working implementation. \parlf |
---|
85 | The table below summarizes the \hommemois by deliverables and tasks |
---|
86 | for both permanent and non-permanent personnels. The non-permanent |
---|
87 | personnels costs represents \mustbecompleted{??}\% of the personnal costs. The |
---|
88 | requested funding for non permanent personnels is 100\% of the |
---|
89 | total ANR requested |
---|
90 | funding. \begin{center}\input{table_inria_compsys_full.tex}\end{center} |
---|
91 | \item [Subcontracting] |
---|
92 | No subcontracting costs. |
---|
93 | \item [Travel] |
---|
94 | The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as |
---|
95 | participation to conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 20\% |
---|
96 | of the total requested ANR funding. |
---|
97 | \item [Expenses for inward billing] |
---|
98 | The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated |
---|
99 | to 4\% of the total requested ANR funding. |
---|
100 | \end{description} |
---|
101 | |
---|
102 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
---|
103 | \subsection{Partner 3: \tima} |
---|
104 | |
---|
105 | \begin{description} |
---|
106 | \item [Equipment] |
---|
107 | No specific equipment acquisition. |
---|
108 | \item [Personnel costs] |
---|
109 | The permanent personnels involved in the project are professor and associate professor |
---|
110 | (Fr\'ed\'eric P\'etrot and Olivier Muller). |
---|
111 | The non permanent personnels are Phd students and post-doc researchers. |
---|
112 | Related costs are estimated in \hommemois. |
---|
113 | One phd student (Adrien Prost-Boucle), funded by the French ministry of research, will |
---|
114 | be working on the project. |
---|
115 | One 100\% funded phd student will be hired in September 2011. A post-doc researcher will |
---|
116 | be hired at the end of 2012 for one year. |
---|
117 | The PhD student will mainly work on the evolution of UGH HLS tool. Thus, we are looking |
---|
118 | for a profile with strong informatic skills and good knowledge in computer architecture. |
---|
119 | The post-doc will mainly work on HPC. The required profile |
---|
120 | will be more oriented on computer architecture and advanced digital design. |
---|
121 | \parlf |
---|
122 | The table below summarizes the man power in \hommemois by tasks for both permanent and |
---|
123 | non-permanent personnels. The detail by deliverables is given in |
---|
124 | figure~\ref{table-livrables-1}. |
---|
125 | The effort of permanent personnels represents 50\% of the total effort. |
---|
126 | The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 86\% of the total ANR requested |
---|
127 | funding. |
---|
128 | \begin{center}\input{table_tima_short.tex}\end{center} |
---|
129 | \item [Subcontracting] |
---|
130 | No subcontracting costs. |
---|
131 | \item [Travel] |
---|
132 | The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as participation to |
---|
133 | conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 10\% of the total requested ANR funding. |
---|
134 | \item [Expenses for inward billing] |
---|
135 | The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% of the total |
---|
136 | requested ANR funding. |
---|
137 | \end{description} |
---|
138 | |
---|
139 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
---|
140 | \subsection{Partner 4: \ubs} |
---|
141 | |
---|
142 | \begin {description} |
---|
143 | \item [Equipment] |
---|
144 | In order to validate the design flow project, the Lab-STICC laboratory will buy FPGA |
---|
145 | developpement boards. The cost for these FPGA boards is estimated to 3\% of the total |
---|
146 | ANR funding. |
---|
147 | \item [Personnel costs] |
---|
148 | The faculty members involved in the project are associate professors (Philippe COUSSY, |
---|
149 | Cyrille CHAVET) or research engineers (Dominique HELLER). All non-permanent personnel |
---|
150 | costs are estimated in \hommemois for senior researchers (post-doc or research |
---|
151 | engineers). |
---|
152 | \parlf |
---|
153 | The table below sumarizes the man power in \hommemois by tasks for both permanent and |
---|
154 | non-permanent personnels. The detail by deliverables is given in |
---|
155 | figure~\ref{table-livrables-2}. |
---|
156 | The non-permanent personnels costs represent 50\% of the personnal costs. |
---|
157 | The requested funding for non permanent personnels is about 83\% of the total ANR |
---|
158 | requested funding. |
---|
159 | \begin{center}\input{table_ubs_short.tex}\end{center} |
---|
160 | \item [Subcontracting] |
---|
161 | No subcontracting costs. |
---|
162 | \item [Travel] |
---|
163 | The travel costs are associated to management and meeting as well as participation to |
---|
164 | conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 10\% of the total requested ANR funding. |
---|
165 | \item [Expenses for inward billing] |
---|
166 | The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% of the total |
---|
167 | requested ANR funding. |
---|
168 | \end {description} |
---|
169 | |
---|
170 | |
---|
171 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
---|
172 | \subsection{Partner 5: \upmc} |
---|
173 | |
---|
174 | \begin{description} |
---|
175 | \item[Equipment] |
---|
176 | No specific equipment acquisition is required for this project. |
---|
177 | The costs for depreciation of workstations and pre-existing FPGA boards are evaluated |
---|
178 | to 7\% of the total requested ANR funding. |
---|
179 | \item[Personnel costs] |
---|
180 | The permanent personnels involved in the project are professors or assistant |
---|
181 | processors (Alain Greiner and Ivan Aug\'e). |
---|
182 | All non permanent personnel costs are estimated in \hommemois for senior researchers |
---|
183 | (post-doc or research engineers). |
---|
184 | The table below sumarizes the man power by tasks in \hommemois for both permanent and |
---|
185 | non-permanent personnels. |
---|
186 | The detail by deliverables is given in figure~\ref{table-livrables-2}. |
---|
187 | The non-permanent personnels costs (24 \hommemois) represent 46\% of the personnal costs. |
---|
188 | The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 79\% of the total ANR |
---|
189 | requested funding. |
---|
190 | \begin{center}\input{table_upmc_short.tex}\end{center} |
---|
191 | \item[Subcontracting] |
---|
192 | No subcontracting costs. |
---|
193 | \item[Travel] |
---|
194 | The travel costs are associated to management and coordination meeting as |
---|
195 | well as participation to conferences. The travel costs are estimated |
---|
196 | to 10\% of the total requested ANR funding. |
---|
197 | \item[Expenses for inward billing] |
---|
198 | The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% |
---|
199 | of the total requested ANR funding. |
---|
200 | \end{description} |
---|
201 | |
---|
202 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
---|
203 | \subsection{Partner 6: \mdslong} |
---|
204 | |
---|
205 | \begin{description} |
---|
206 | \item[Equipment] |
---|
207 | No specific equipment acquisition is required for this project. |
---|
208 | \item[Personnel costs] |
---|
209 | \mds employees involved in the project are permanent managers, engineers and PhD graduates. |
---|
210 | The man power detail in \hommemois by deliverables is given in |
---|
211 | figure~\ref{table-livrables-1} and a sumary by task in the following table. |
---|
212 | \begin{center}\input{table_mds_short.tex}\end{center} |
---|
213 | \item[Subcontracting] |
---|
214 | No subcontracting costs. |
---|
215 | \item[Travel] |
---|
216 | The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as participation to |
---|
217 | conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 2\% of the total requested ANR funding. |
---|
218 | \item[Expenses for inward billing] none |
---|
219 | \item[Other working costs] none |
---|
220 | \end{description} |
---|
221 | |
---|
222 | |
---|
223 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
---|
224 | \subsection{Partner 7: \bull} |
---|
225 | \begin{description} |
---|
226 | \item[Equipment] |
---|
227 | Acquisition of a FPGA development board will represent the main equipment cost for |
---|
228 | Bull in COACH. It is estimated at about 5\% (tbc) of the total funding. |
---|
229 | \item[Personnel costs] |
---|
230 | A permanent engineer will be assigned full time to the project for a duration of 20 |
---|
231 | months as shown in the table below that gives the man power in \hommemois: |
---|
232 | \begin{center}\input{table_bull_full.tex}\end{center} |
---|
233 | \item[Subcontracting] |
---|
234 | No subcontracting costs. |
---|
235 | \item[Travel] |
---|
236 | Application of a standard 10\% of the total funding to travel costs. |
---|
237 | \item[Expenses for inward billing] |
---|
238 | Costs justified by inward billing are estimated to about 5\% of the total funding. |
---|
239 | \item[Other working costs] none |
---|
240 | \end{description} |
---|
241 | |
---|
242 | |
---|
243 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
---|
244 | \subsection{Partner 8: \thales} |
---|
245 | |
---|
246 | \begin{description} |
---|
247 | \item[Equipment] |
---|
248 | In order to validate the design flow,TRT will buy FPGA developpement boards. The cost |
---|
249 | for these FPGA boards is estimated to 10 k\euro (6\% of the total ANR funding). |
---|
250 | \item[Personnel costs] |
---|
251 | The effort to adapt SPEAR DE to generate the input files to COACH framework is |
---|
252 | estimated to 13 \hommemois. |
---|
253 | The effort to describe and develop the application is estimated to 14 \hommemois. |
---|
254 | Finally we need one man*month for the partiticipation to the global specification in task 2. |
---|
255 | This is sumarized in the table below: |
---|
256 | \begin{center}\input{table_thales_full.tex}\end{center} |
---|
257 | \item[Subcontracting] |
---|
258 | No subcontracting costs. |
---|
259 | \item[Travel] |
---|
260 | The travel costs are associated to meeting, plenaries as well as participation to |
---|
261 | conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 10 k\euro. The travel costs are estimated to |
---|
262 | 5\% of the total requested ANR funding. |
---|
263 | \item[Expenses for inward billing] none |
---|
264 | \item[Other working costs] none |
---|
265 | \end{description} |
---|
266 | |
---|
267 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
---|
268 | % |
---|
269 | \begin{landscape} |
---|
270 | \begin{figure} |
---|
271 | \begin{small} |
---|
272 | \settowidth\desclen{XILINX RTL optimisation (5)} |
---|
273 | \def\resstablestyletitle#1{\parbox{\desclen}{\textit{#1}}} |
---|
274 | \begin{minipage}[b]{.47\linewidth}\center |
---|
275 | \input{table_inria_cairn_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex}\\ \inria \vspace{2.5ex}\\ |
---|
276 | \input{table_mds_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex}\\ \mds \\ |
---|
277 | \end{minipage}\hfill\begin{minipage}[b]{.47\linewidth}\center |
---|
278 | \input{table_tima_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex} \\ \tima |
---|
279 | \end{minipage} |
---|
280 | \end{small} |
---|
281 | \caption{\label{table-livrables-1} Man power in \hommemois for the deliverables (1)} |
---|
282 | \end{figure} |
---|
283 | % |
---|
284 | \begin{figure} |
---|
285 | \begin{small} |
---|
286 | \settowidth\desclen{XILINX RTL optimisation (5)} |
---|
287 | \def\resstablestyletitle#1{\parbox{\desclen}{\textit{#1}}} |
---|
288 | \begin{minipage}[b]{.47\linewidth}\center |
---|
289 | \input{table_ubs_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex}\\ \ubs \vspace{2.5ex}\\ |
---|
290 | %\input{table_thales_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex}\\ \thales \\ |
---|
291 | \end{minipage}\hfill\begin{minipage}[b]{.47\linewidth}\center |
---|
292 | \input{table_upmc_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex} \\ \upmc |
---|
293 | \end{minipage} |
---|
294 | \end{small} |
---|
295 | \caption{\label{table-livrables-2} Man power in \hommemois for the deliverables (2)} |
---|
296 | \end{figure} |
---|
297 | \end{landscape} |
---|
298 | % |
---|
299 | %\begin{landscape} |
---|
300 | %\begin{figure} |
---|
301 | %\begin{small} |
---|
302 | %\settowidth\desclen{XILINX RTL optimisation (5)} |
---|
303 | %\def\resstablestyletitle#1{\parbox{\desclen}{\textit{#1}}} |
---|
304 | %\hfill |
---|
305 | %\begin{minipage}[b]{.47\linewidth}\center |
---|
306 | %\input{table_inria_compsys_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex}\\ \lip \vspace{2.5ex}\\ |
---|
307 | %\end{minipage}\hfill |
---|
308 | %\end{small} |
---|
309 | %\caption{\label{table-livrables-2} Man power in \hommemois for the deliverables (3)} |
---|
310 | %\end{figure} |
---|
311 | %\end{landscape} |
---|