\anrdoc{On présentera ici la justification scientifique et technique des moyens
demandés dans le document de soumission A par chaque partenaire et
synthétisés à l'échelle du projet dans la fiche «Tableaux récapitulatifs»
du document de soumission A.\\
Chaque partenaire justifiera les moyens qu'il demande en distinguant les
différents postes de dépenses.\\
Pour chaque partenaire on precisera:
\begin{itemize}
\item Equipment: 1) Préciser la nature des équipements* et justifier le
    choix des équipements. 2) Si nécessaire, préciser la part de financement
    demandé sur le projet et si les achats envisagés doivent être complétés
    par d'autres sources de financement. Si tel est le cas, indiquer le
    montant et l'origine de ces financements complémentaires.\\
    * Attention: Un devis sera demandé si le projet est retenu pour
    financement.
\item Personnel costs
    1) Le personnel non permanent (thèses, post- doctorants,CDD...)
    financé sur le projet devra être justifié.
    2) Fournir  les profils des postes à pourvoir pour les personnels à
    recruter (1/2 page maximum par type de poste)
    3) Pour les thèses, préciser si des demandes de bourse de thèse sont
    prévues ou en cours, en préciser la nature et la part de financement
    imputable au projet. 
\item Subcontracting. Préciser: 1) la nature des prestations
    2) le type de prestataire.
\item Travel.  Préciser: 1) les missions liées aux travaux d'acquisition
    sur le terrain (campagnes de mesures),
    2) les missions relevant de colloques, congrès.
\item Costs justified by internal procedures of invoicing. Préciser la nature
      des prestations.
\item Other expense. Toute dépense significative relevant de ce poste
      devra être justifiée.
\end{itemize}}

\def\resstablestyletitle#1{\begin{small}{\textit{#1}}\end{small}}

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\subsection{Partner 1: \inria}

\begin{description}
\item [Equipment]
  No specific equipment acquisition. 
\item [Personnel costs] The faculty members involved in the project
  are François Charot (INRIA researcher), Steven Derrien (associate
  professor), Christophe Wolinski (professor) and Charles Wagner
  (research engineer). The non-permanent personal required is a PhD
  student that will mainly work on ASIP generation. We are looking for
  a profile with strong informatic skills and good knowledge in
  computer architecture.
  \parlf
  The table below summarizes the manpower in \hommemois by tasks for both permanent and
  non-permanent personnels. The detail by deliverables is given in
  figure~\ref{table-livrables-1}.
  The non-permanent personnels costs represent {48\%} of the personnal
  costs. The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 100\% of
  the total ANR requested funding.
    \begin{center}\input{table_inria_cairn_short.tex}\end{center}
\item [Subcontracting]
  No subcontracting costs.
\item [Travel]
  The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as participation to
  conferences. The travel costs are estimated to {7,5\%} of the total
  requested ANR funding.
\item [Expenses for inward billing]
  The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% of the total
  requested ANR funding.
\end{description}


\subsection{Partner 2: \lip}

\begin{description}
\item [Equipment]
  No specific equipment acquisition. The costs for depreciation of
  workstations is evaluated to 4\% of the total requested ANR funding.
\item [Personnel costs]
  The faculty members involved in the project are Christophe Alias
  (INRIA researcher) and Paul Feautrier (emeritus professor at
  ENS-Lyon). The non-permanent personel required is a post-doc that
  will work on FIFO construction, then on extensions of process
  construction and memory optimization to non-polyhedral loops.  We
  are looking for a candidate with both theoretical and practical
  skills, that will be able to get a sufficient understanding of the
  polyhedral techniques to produce a working implementation.  \parlf
  The table below summarizes the \hommemois by deliverables and tasks
  for both permanent and non-permanent personnels.  The non-permanent
  personnels costs represents \mustbecompleted{??}\% of the personnal costs. The
  requested funding for non permanent personnels is 100\% of the
  total ANR requested
  funding.  \begin{center}\input{table_inria_compsys_full.tex}\end{center}
\item [Subcontracting]
  No subcontracting costs.
\item [Travel]
  The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as
  participation to conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 20\%
  of the total requested ANR funding.
\item [Expenses for inward billing]
  The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated
  to 4\% of the total requested ANR funding.
\end{description}

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\subsection{Partner 3: \tima}

\begin{description}
\item [Equipment]
  No specific equipment acquisition. 
\item [Personnel costs]
  The permanent personnels involved in the project are professor and associate professor
  (Fr\'ed\'eric P\'etrot and Olivier Muller).
  The non permanent personnels are Phd students and post-doc researchers.
  Related costs are estimated in \hommemois.
  One phd student (Adrien Prost-Boucle), funded by the French ministry of research, will
  be working on the project.
  One 100\% funded phd student will be hired in September 2011. A post-doc researcher will
  be hired at the end of 2012 for one year.
  The PhD student will mainly work on the evolution of UGH HLS tool. Thus, we are looking
  for a profile with strong informatic skills and good knowledge in computer architecture.
  The post-doc will mainly work on HPC. The required profile
  will be more oriented on computer architecture and advanced digital design.
  \parlf
  The table below summarizes the man power in \hommemois by tasks for both permanent and
  non-permanent personnels. The detail by deliverables is given in
  figure~\ref{table-livrables-1}.
  The effort of permanent personnels represents 50\% of the total effort.
  The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 86\% of the total ANR requested
  funding.
    \begin{center}\input{table_tima_short.tex}\end{center}
\item [Subcontracting]
  No subcontracting costs.
\item [Travel]
  The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as participation to
  conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 10\% of the total requested ANR funding.
\item [Expenses for inward billing]
  The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% of the total
  requested ANR funding.
\end{description}

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\subsection{Partner 4: \ubs}

\begin {description}
\item [Equipment]
  In order to validate the design flow project, the Lab-STICC laboratory will buy FPGA
  developpement boards.  The cost for these FPGA boards is estimated to 3\% of the total
  ANR funding.
\item [Personnel costs]
  The faculty members involved in the project are associate professors (Philippe COUSSY,
  Cyrille CHAVET) or research engineers (Dominique HELLER). All non-permanent personnel
  costs are estimated in \hommemois for senior researchers (post-doc or research
  engineers).
  \parlf
  The table below sumarizes the man power in \hommemois by tasks for both permanent and
  non-permanent personnels. The detail by deliverables is given in
  figure~\ref{table-livrables-2}.
  The non-permanent personnels costs represent 50\% of the personnal costs.
  The requested funding for non permanent personnels is about 83\% of the total ANR
  requested funding.
    \begin{center}\input{table_ubs_short.tex}\end{center}
\item [Subcontracting]
  No subcontracting costs.
\item [Travel]
  The travel costs are associated to management and meeting as well as participation to
  conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 10\% of the total requested ANR funding.
\item [Expenses for inward billing]
  The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% of the total
  requested ANR funding.
\end {description}


%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\subsection{Partner 5: \upmc}

\begin{description}
\item[Equipment]
    No specific equipment acquisition is required for this project. 
    The costs for depreciation of workstations and pre-existing FPGA boards are evaluated
    to 7\% of the total requested ANR funding.
\item[Personnel costs]
    The permanent personnels involved in the project are professors or assistant
    processors (Alain Greiner and Ivan Aug\'e).
    All non permanent personnel costs are estimated in \hommemois for senior researchers
    (post-doc or research engineers).
    The table below sumarizes the man power by tasks in \hommemois for both permanent  and
    non-permanent personnels.
    The detail by deliverables is given in figure~\ref{table-livrables-2}.
    The non-permanent personnels costs (24 \hommemois) represent 46\% of the personnal costs.
    The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 79\% of the total ANR
    requested funding.
    \begin{center}\input{table_upmc_short.tex}\end{center}
\item[Subcontracting]
    No subcontracting costs.
\item[Travel]
    The travel costs are associated to management and coordination meeting as
    well as participation to conferences. The travel costs are estimated
    to 10\% of the total requested ANR funding.
\item[Expenses for inward billing]
    The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\%
    of the total requested ANR funding.
\end{description}

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\subsection{Partner 6: \mdslong}

\begin{description}
\item[Equipment]
  No specific equipment acquisition is required for this project. 
\item[Personnel costs]
  \mds employees involved in the project are permanent managers, engineers and PhD graduates.
  The man power detail in \hommemois by deliverables is given in
  figure~\ref{table-livrables-1} and a sumary by task in the following table.
  \begin{center}\input{table_mds_short.tex}\end{center}
\item[Subcontracting]
  No subcontracting costs.
\item[Travel]
  The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as participation to
  conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 2\% of the total requested ANR funding.
\item[Expenses for inward billing] none
\item[Other working costs] none
\end{description}


%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\subsection{Partner 7: \bull}
\begin{description}
\item[Equipment]
    Acquisition of a FPGA development board will represent the main equipment cost for
    Bull in COACH. It is estimated at about 5\% (tbc) of the total funding.
\item[Personnel costs]
    A permanent engineer will be assigned full time to the project for a duration of 20
    months as shown in the table below that gives the man power in \hommemois:
    \begin{center}\input{table_bull_full.tex}\end{center}
\item[Subcontracting]
    No subcontracting costs.
\item[Travel]
    Application of a standard 10\% of the total funding to travel costs.
\item[Expenses for inward billing]
    Costs justified by inward billing are estimated to about 5\% of the total funding.
\item[Other working costs] none
\end{description}


%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\subsection{Partner 8: \thales}

\begin{description}
\item[Equipment]
    In order to validate the design flow,TRT will buy FPGA developpement boards. The cost
    for these FPGA boards is estimated to 10 k\euro (6\% of the total ANR funding).
\item[Personnel costs]
    The effort to adapt SPEAR DE to generate the input files to COACH framework is
    estimated to 13 \hommemois.
    The effort to describe and develop the application is estimated to 14 \hommemois.
    Finally we need one man*month for the partiticipation to the global specification in task 2.
    This is sumarized in the table below:
    \begin{center}\input{table_thales_full.tex}\end{center}
\item[Subcontracting]
    No subcontracting costs.
\item[Travel]
    The travel costs are associated to meeting, plenaries as well as participation to
    conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 10 k\euro. The travel costs are estimated to
    5\% of the total requested ANR funding.
\item[Expenses for inward billing] none
\item[Other working costs] none
\end{description}

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%
\begin{landscape}
\begin{figure}
\begin{small}
\settowidth\desclen{XILINX RTL optimisation (5)}
\def\resstablestyletitle#1{\parbox{\desclen}{\textit{#1}}}
\begin{minipage}[b]{.47\linewidth}\center
\input{table_inria_cairn_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex}\\  \inria  \vspace{2.5ex}\\
\input{table_mds_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex}\\       \mds \\
\end{minipage}\hfill\begin{minipage}[b]{.47\linewidth}\center
\input{table_tima_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex} \\ \tima
\end{minipage}
\end{small}
\caption{\label{table-livrables-1} Man power in \hommemois for the deliverables (1)}
\end{figure}
%
\begin{figure}
\begin{small}
\settowidth\desclen{XILINX RTL optimisation (5)}
\def\resstablestyletitle#1{\parbox{\desclen}{\textit{#1}}}
\begin{minipage}[b]{.47\linewidth}\center
\input{table_ubs_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex}\\     \ubs    \vspace{2.5ex}\\
%\input{table_thales_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex}\\  \thales \\
\end{minipage}\hfill\begin{minipage}[b]{.47\linewidth}\center
\input{table_upmc_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex} \\   \upmc
\end{minipage}
\end{small}
\caption{\label{table-livrables-2} Man power in \hommemois for the deliverables (2)}
\end{figure}
\end{landscape}
%
%\begin{landscape}
%\begin{figure}
%\begin{small}
%\settowidth\desclen{XILINX RTL optimisation (5)}
%\def\resstablestyletitle#1{\parbox{\desclen}{\textit{#1}}}
%\hfill 
%\begin{minipage}[b]{.47\linewidth}\center
%\input{table_inria_compsys_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex}\\     \lip    \vspace{2.5ex}\\
%\end{minipage}\hfill
%\end{small}
%\caption{\label{table-livrables-2} Man power in \hommemois for the deliverables (3)}
%\end{figure}
%\end{landscape}