Index: /anr/section-4.1.tex
===================================================================
--- /anr/section-4.1.tex	(revision 253)
+++ /anr/section-4.1.tex	(revision 254)
@@ -67,6 +67,6 @@
 \item[Task-2: \textit{\Backbone}] This task tackles the fundamental points of the
 	project such as the defintion of the COACH inputs and outputs,
-    the internal formats (e.g. \xcoach), the architectural templates and
-    the design flow.
+    the internal formats (i.e. \xcoach and \xcoachplus) and their associated tools, 
+	the architectural templates and the design flow.
 \item[Task-3: \textit{System generation}] This task addresses the prototyping and
     the generation of digital system. Apart from HAS that belongs to task 3
@@ -111,8 +111,8 @@
 The graph shows:
 \begin{itemize}
-\item Notwithstanding that $T4$ and $T5$ functionalities are complementary, 
+\item Even though $T4$ and $T5$ functionalities are complementary, 
 their developments are independent (thanks to the \xcoach internal format).
-\item $T3$ slightly depends on $T4$ and $T5$. Indeed, $T3$ may works
-without $T4$ and $T5$ if we limit ourselves to digital systems without hardware
+\item $T3$ slightly depends on $T4$ and $T5$. Indeed, $T3$ may work
+without $T4$ and $T5$ if targeted digital systems do not include hardware
 accelerators. 
 \item $T3$ strongly impacts $T6$ but $T3$ does not depend at all on
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@
 \item $T2$ drives all the tasks ($T3$, $T4$, $T5$, $T6$) and is at the heart of
 the COACH project.
-\item The demonstrators developped in $T7$, of course strongly depends on the achievements 
+\item The demonstrators developped in $T7$, of course strongly depend on the achievements 
 of the previous tasks ($T2$, $T3$, $T4$, $T5$, $T6$).
-\item $T8$ and $T1$ respectively depends on and impacts all the other tasks.
+\item $T8$ and $T1$ depend on and impact all the other tasks.
 \end{itemize}
 This organisation offers enough robustness to insure the success of the
@@ -129,5 +129,5 @@
 The only critical task in this chart is $T2$. \label{xcoach-problem}
 However, the partners met
-10 times (a one day meeting per month) during the last year to prepare the
-specification and the project proposal. This gives us a degree of confidence 
+12 times (a one-day meeting per month) during the last year: 10 meetings to exchange and work on scientific
+and technical aspects and 2 meetings to prepare the project proposal. This gives us a high degree of confidence 
 that $T2$ will be completed in time.