Opened 15 years ago
Last modified 15 years ago
#40 new task
Add a topology description API — at Version 1
| Reported by: | Nicolas Pouillon | Owned by: | Nicolas Pouillon |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | major | Milestone: | Topology handling |
| Component: | drivers | Keywords: | |
| Cc: |
Description (last modified by )
Overview
Goals
- Abstract the low-level description APIs
- FlattenedDeviceTrees
- ACPI
- Enumerate the platform
- Component connection topology
- IRQ routing
- Memory configuration (Cacheability, latency, …)
- Deduce the correct OS mapping
- For memory allocators (region API)
- Scheduler lists repartition
- Shortest-path IRQ routing
- SRL tasks/resources mapping
APIs
- Explore the topology
- Extract journey costs
- Query the topology: Get nodes by a selector
- Proximity (
get all rams that are at less than 3 hops than cpu XX) - Properties (
get all cpus of arch XX) - Properties (
get all devices of type XX) -- maybe redundant with hexo's device_s tree
- Proximity (
Optional features discussion
- Do we need to handle loads accounting (NoC load, CPU, memory, …) here ?
(i.e. something like "Ok, for now on I use an avg 1 MBps of NoC path from X to Y, then report to others)
- NoC is tightly coupled to topology, this could be interesting
- CPU is somewhat highly dynamic, even if we can sometimes predict, is it obvious here ?
- Memory has its own allocators, do not duplicate
- If we do not, we probably need a separate accounting library
- Maybe a-la mem_alloc(), per resource
- So we must duplicate topology for NoC accounting
- We can also put this is model-specific calls
libTopology data model
Conceptual
It is a graph of nodes. Nodes are associated to an element of the architecture. Some node examples:
- A routing element (DSPIN NoC (as a whole)), a local interconnect
- A CPU+cache
- A memory bank
- An ICU
- A device
Each node can be associated to a device -- There is at most 1 device per node, some nodes have no associated device (e.g. NoC has no dev)
Structures
struct topo_model_s
{
void (*init)(struct topo_node_s *node, void *param);
void (*cleanup)(struct topo_node_s *node);
// A bunch of function pointers for operations follows, see below
};
struct topo_node_s
{
struct topo_model_s *model; /// model handling this node
void *priv; /// model's private data
struct device_s *dev; /// associated device, if any
};
Needed APIs
Device to node bijection
struct device_s *topo_node_to_device(struct topo_node_s *node);
struct topo_node_s *topo_device_to_node(struct device_s *dev);
Topology exploration
There must be a high-level call to explore the path from a node to another. We will assume:
- There is one such path
- We do not cross address spaces during the exploration (route a data packet, cant transform it in an IRQ)
- There is one address type for destination
High level call which does the routing and accumulates round-trip metrics:
error_t topo_journey_metrics( struct topo_metrics_s *result, struct topo_node_s *start, struct topo_addr_s *dest);
(round-trip is sufficient as there is roughly the same energy involved in reads and writes, and also gives the model the choice of what a round-trip involves (totally different for a noc and a bus))
An address is a destination valid for a type of routing exploration, most of the time it will be a bus address, but may be an IRQ number, an USB device no, …
enum topo_addr_type_e
{
TOPO_ADDR_BUS;
};
struct topo_addr_s
{
enum topo_addr_type_e type;
union {
struct {
uintptr_t address;
} bus;
};
};
Accumulated metrics describe the features of the walked path:
struct topo_metrics_s
{
uint32_t hop_count;
uint32_t latency; /// cycles ? us ?
uint32_t max_byte_per_sec; /// capped max on path
uint32_t power_per_byte; /// overall consumption estimation
};
Needed calls in model-specific functions
error_t next(
struct topo_node_s *node, /// node of our model where we are coming from
const struct topo_addr_s *dest, /// destination address for the current address space
struct topo_metrics_s *metrics, /// Metrics to update on the go
struct topo_node_s **next_node); /// Next hop


Bringing the discussion here