Changeset 91 for papers/FDL2012


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Apr 6, 2012, 4:53:13 PM (13 years ago)
Author:
cecile
Message:

intro+ blind

Location:
papers/FDL2012
Files:
2 edited

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
  • papers/FDL2012/FDL2012.tex

    r89 r91  
    3434
    3535 \title{ An efficient refinement strategy exploiting components' properties in a CEGAR process}
    36  \name{Syed Hussein S. ALWI, Emmanuelle ENCRENAZ and C\'{e}cile BRAUNSTEIN}
     36% \name{Syed Hussein S. ALWI, Emmanuelle ENCRENAZ and C\'{e}cile BRAUNSTEIN}
    3737% \thanks{This work was supported by...}}
    38  \address{Universit\'{e} Pierre et Marie Curie Paris 6, \\
    39                  LIP6-SOC (CNRS UMR 7606), \\
    40                             4, place Jussieu, \\
    41                 75005 Paris, FRANCE. }
     38% \address{Universit\'{e} Pierre et Marie Curie Paris 6, \\
     39%                 LIP6-SOC (CNRS UMR 7606), \\
     40%                            4, place Jussieu, \\
     41%                75005 Paris, FRANCE. }
     42\name{Removed for blind review}
     43\address{ }
    4244
    4345\begin{document}
  • papers/FDL2012/introduction.tex

    r89 r91  
    22
    33
    4 Therefore, it is important to ensure, during their design phase, their correctness with respect to their specifications. Errors found late in the design of these systems is a major problem for electronic circuit designers and programmers as it may delay getting a new product to the market or cause failure of some critical devices that are already in use. System verification, indeed, guarantees a high level of quality in terms of safety and reliabilty while reducing financial risk.
    5 
    6 
    7 The main challenge in model checking is dealing with the state space combinatorial explosion phenomenon. Systems with many components that can interact with each other or systems with data structure that can assume many different values will increase the number of state transition possibilities at a particular instance. In such cases, the number of global states will grow exponentially in function of the complexity of the system and unfortunately may surpasses our computation capacity.
     4Therefore, it is important to ensure, during their design phase, their
     5correctness with respect to their specifications. Errors found late in the
     6design of these systems is a major problem for electronic circuit designers
     7and programmers as it may delay getting a new product to the market or cause
     8failure of some critical devices that are already in use. System verification
     9using formal methods such as model checking guarantees a high level of quality in terms of safety and reliabilty while reducing financial risk.
    810
    911
    1012
    11 %\subsection{Related Works}
     13The main challenge in model checking is dealing with the state space combinatorial explosion phenomenon. %\subsection{Related Works}
    1214A strategy to overcome the state explosion problem is by performing abstraction. A method for the construction of an abstract state graph of an arbitrary system automatically was first proposed by Graf and Saidi \cite{GrafSaidi97abstract_construct} using Pvs theorem prover. Here, the abstract states are generated from the valuations of a set of predicates on the concrete variables. The construction approach is automatic and incremental.
    1315
     
    1921
    2022
    21 An alternative method to get over the state explosion problem is the compositional strategy. The strategy is based on the assume-guarantee reasoning where assumptions are made on other components of the systems when verifying one component. In other words, it is shown that a component $C_1$ guarantees certain properties $P_1$ on the hypothesis that component $C_2$ provides certain properties $P_2$ and vice-versa for $C_2$. If this is the case, then we can claim that the composition of $C_1$ and $C_2$, both executed in parallel and may interact with each other, guarantees the properties $P_1$ and $P_2$ unconditionally. Several works have manipulated this technique notably in \cite{GrumbergLong91assume_guarantee} where Grumberg and Long described the methodology using a subset of CTL in their framework and later in \cite{HQR98assume_guarantee} where Herzinger and al. presented their successful implementations and case study regarding this approach.
     23An alternative method to get over the state explosion problem is the compositional strategy. The strategy is based on the assume-guarantee reasoning where assumptions are made on other components of the systems when verifying one component.
     24Several works have manipulated this technique notably in \cite{GrumbergLong91assume_guarantee} where Grumberg and Long described the methodology using a subset of CTL in their framework and later in \cite{HQR98assume_guarantee} where Henzinger and al. presented their successful implementations and case study regarding this approach.
    2225
    2326
    24 \textbf{\emph{Related Works :}} Xie and Browne have proposed a method for software verification based on composition of several components \cite{XieBrowne03composition_soft}. Their main objective is developing components that could be reused with certitude that their behaviors will always respect their specification when associated in a proper composition. Therefore, temporal properties of the software are specified, verified and packaged with the component for possible reuse. The implementation of this approach on software have been succesful and the application of the assume-guarantee reasoning has considerably reduced the model checking complexity. A comprehensive approach to model-check component-based systems with abstraction refinement technique that uses verified properties as abstractions has been presented in \cite{LiSunXieSong08compAbsRef}.
     27 Xie and Browne have proposed a method for software verification based on composition of several components \cite{XieBrowne03composition_soft}. Their main objective is developing components that could be reused with certitude that their behaviors will always respect their specification when associated in a proper composition. Therefore, temporal properties of the software are specified, verified and packaged with the component for possible reuse. The implementation of this approach on software have been succesful and the application of the assume-guarantee reasoning has considerably reduced the model checking complexity. A comprehensive approach to model-check component-based systems with abstraction refinement technique that uses verified properties as abstractions has been presented in \cite{LiSunXieSong08compAbsRef}.
    2528
    2629
Note: See TracChangeset for help on using the changeset viewer.