1 | \def\resstablestyletitle#1{\begin{small}{\textit{#1}}\end{small}} |
---|
2 | |
---|
3 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
---|
4 | \subsection{Partner 1: \irisa} |
---|
5 | |
---|
6 | \begin{figure}\leavevmode\center |
---|
7 | \input{table_inria_cairn_full.tex} |
---|
8 | \caption{\label{ress-detail-irisa}Man power in $mm$ for the delivrables of \irisa.} |
---|
9 | \end{figure} |
---|
10 | \begin{description} |
---|
11 | \item [Equipment] |
---|
12 | No specific equipment acquisition. |
---|
13 | \item [Personnel costs] The faculty members involved in the project |
---|
14 | are François Charot (INRIA researcher) Steven Derrien (associate |
---|
15 | professor) and Charles Wagner (research engineer). The non-permanent |
---|
16 | personal required is a PhD student that will mainly work on ASIP |
---|
17 | generation. We are looking for a profile with strong informatic skills |
---|
18 | and good knowledge in computer architecture. |
---|
19 | |
---|
20 | The table below summarizes the manpower by tasks for both permanent and non-permanent |
---|
21 | personnels. The detail by delivrables is given in figure~\ref{ress-detail-irisa}. |
---|
22 | The non-permanent personnels costs represent \mustbecompleted{??\%} of the personnal |
---|
23 | costs. The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 100\% of |
---|
24 | the total ANR requested funding. |
---|
25 | \begin{center}\input{table_inria_cairn_short.tex}\end{center} |
---|
26 | |
---|
27 | \item [Subcontracting] |
---|
28 | No subcontracting costs. |
---|
29 | \item [Travel] |
---|
30 | The travel costs are associated to project meeting as |
---|
31 | well as participation to conferences. The travel costs are estimated |
---|
32 | to \mustbecompleted{??\%} of the total requested ANR funding. |
---|
33 | \item [Expenses for inward billing] |
---|
34 | The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% |
---|
35 | of the total requested ANR funding.\\ |
---|
36 | \end{description} |
---|
37 | |
---|
38 | |
---|
39 | \subsection{Partner 2: \lip} |
---|
40 | |
---|
41 | \begin{description} |
---|
42 | \item [Equipment] |
---|
43 | No specific equipment acquisition. |
---|
44 | \item [Personnel costs] |
---|
45 | The faculty members involved in the project are a professor at ENS |
---|
46 | Lyon (Paul Feautrier) and a research associate (CR2) at INRIA |
---|
47 | Rh\^one-Alpes (Christophe Alias). The non-permanent personal required |
---|
48 | is a PhD student that will work on network process generation from |
---|
49 | polyhedral loops, then on extensions to non-polyhedral loops. We are |
---|
50 | looking for a student with both theoretical and practical skills, that |
---|
51 | will be able to get a sufficient understanding of the polyhedral |
---|
52 | techniques and to produce a working implementation. |
---|
53 | |
---|
54 | The table below summarizes the man power by delivrables and tasks for both permanent and |
---|
55 | non-permanent personnels. |
---|
56 | The non-permanent personnels costs represent \mustbecompleted{??\%} of the personnal |
---|
57 | costs. The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 100\% of |
---|
58 | the total ANR requested funding. |
---|
59 | \begin{center}\input{table_inria_compsys_full.tex}\end{center} |
---|
60 | |
---|
61 | \item [Subcontracting] |
---|
62 | No subcontracting costs. |
---|
63 | \item [Travel] |
---|
64 | The travel costs are associated to project meeting as |
---|
65 | well as participation to conferences. The travel costs are estimated |
---|
66 | to \mustbecompleted{??\%} of the total requested ANR funding. |
---|
67 | \item [Expenses for inward billing] |
---|
68 | The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% |
---|
69 | of the total requested ANR funding.\\ |
---|
70 | \end{description} |
---|
71 | |
---|
72 | |
---|
73 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
---|
74 | \subsection{Partner 3: \tima} |
---|
75 | \begin{figure}\leavevmode\center |
---|
76 | \input{table_tima_full.tex} |
---|
77 | \caption{\label{ress-detail-tima}Man power in $mm$ for the delivrables of \tima.} |
---|
78 | \end{figure} |
---|
79 | \begin{description} |
---|
80 | \item [Equipment] |
---|
81 | No specific equipment acquisition. |
---|
82 | \item [Personnel costs] |
---|
83 | The permanent personnels involved in the project are professor and |
---|
84 | assistant professor (Fr\'ed\'eric P\'etrot and Olivier Muller). |
---|
85 | The non permanent personnels are Phd students and post-doc researchers. |
---|
86 | Related costs are estimated in men per months. |
---|
87 | One phd student (Adrien Prost-Boucle), funded by the |
---|
88 | french ministry of research, |
---|
89 | will be working on the project. |
---|
90 | One 100\% funded phd student will be hired in september 2010. A post-doc researcher |
---|
91 | will be hired at the end of 2011 for one year and an half. |
---|
92 | The PhD student will mainly work on the evolution of UGH HLS tool. Thus, we |
---|
93 | are looking for a profile with strong informatic skills and good knowledge in |
---|
94 | computer architecture. |
---|
95 | The post-doc will mainly work on dynamic reconfiguration and HPC. The required |
---|
96 | profile will be more oriented on computer architecture and advanced digital design. |
---|
97 | |
---|
98 | The table below sumarizes the man power by task for both permanent and non-permanent |
---|
99 | personnels. The detail by delivrables is given in figure~\ref{ress-detail-tima}. |
---|
100 | The requested funding for personnels represent 50\% of the total personnal costs. |
---|
101 | The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 85\% of the total ANR |
---|
102 | requested funding. |
---|
103 | \begin{center}\input{table_tima_short.tex}\end{center} |
---|
104 | \item [Subcontracting] |
---|
105 | No subcontracting costs. |
---|
106 | \item [Travel] |
---|
107 | The travel costs are associated to project meeting as |
---|
108 | well as participation to conferences. The travel costs are estimated |
---|
109 | to 11\% of the total requested ANR funding. |
---|
110 | \item [Expenses for inward billing] |
---|
111 | The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% |
---|
112 | of the total requested ANR funding.\\ |
---|
113 | \end{description} |
---|
114 | |
---|
115 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
---|
116 | \subsection{Partner 4: \ubs} |
---|
117 | \begin{figure}\leavevmode\center |
---|
118 | \input{table_ubs_full.tex} |
---|
119 | \caption{\label{ress-detail-ubs}Man power in $mm$ for the delivrables of \ubs.} |
---|
120 | \end{figure} |
---|
121 | |
---|
122 | \begin {description} |
---|
123 | \item [Equipment] |
---|
124 | In order to validate the design flow project, the LabSTICC laboratory will buy FPGA developpement boards. |
---|
125 | The cost for these FPGA boards is estimated to 3\% of the total ANR funding. |
---|
126 | \item [Personnel costs] |
---|
127 | The faculty members involved in the project are |
---|
128 | associate professors (Philippe COUSSY, Cyrille CHAVET) or research engineers (Dominique HELLER). |
---|
129 | All non-permanent personnel costs are estimated in men*months |
---|
130 | for senior researchers (post-doc or research engineers). |
---|
131 | |
---|
132 | The table below sumarizes the man power by task for both permanent and non-permanent |
---|
133 | personnels. The detail by delivrables is given in figure~\ref {ress-detail-ubs}. |
---|
134 | The non-permanent personnels costs represent 50\% of the personnal costs. |
---|
135 | The requested funding for non permanent personnels is about 83\% of the total ANR |
---|
136 | requested funding. |
---|
137 | \begin{center}\input{table_ubs_short.tex}\end{center} |
---|
138 | \item [Subcontracting] |
---|
139 | No subcontracting costs. |
---|
140 | \item [Travel] |
---|
141 | The travel costs are associated to management and meeting as |
---|
142 | well as participation to conferences. The travel costs are estimated |
---|
143 | to 10\% of the total requested ANR funding. |
---|
144 | \item [Expenses for inward billing] |
---|
145 | The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% |
---|
146 | of the total requested ANR funding. |
---|
147 | \end {description} |
---|
148 | |
---|
149 | |
---|
150 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
---|
151 | \subsection{Partner 5: \upmc} |
---|
152 | \begin{figure}\leavevmode\center |
---|
153 | \input{table_upmc_full.tex} |
---|
154 | \caption{\label{ress-detail-upmc}Man power in $mm$ for the delivrables of \upmc.} |
---|
155 | \end{figure} |
---|
156 | \begin{description} |
---|
157 | \item[Equipment] |
---|
158 | No specific equipment acquisition is required for this project. |
---|
159 | The costs for depreciation of workstations |
---|
160 | and pre-existing FPGA boards are evaluated to 7\% of the total |
---|
161 | requested ANR funding. |
---|
162 | \item[Personnel costs] |
---|
163 | The permanent personnels involved in the project are professors or |
---|
164 | assistant processors (Alain Greiner and Ivan Aug\'e). |
---|
165 | All non permanent personnel costs are estimated in men*months |
---|
166 | for senior researchers (post-doc or research engineers). |
---|
167 | The table below sumarizes the man power by task for both permanent and non-permanent |
---|
168 | personnels. The detail by delivrables is given in figure~\ref{ress-detail-upmc}. |
---|
169 | The non-permanent personnels costs represent 50\% of the personnal costs. |
---|
170 | The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 79\% of the total ANR |
---|
171 | requested funding. |
---|
172 | \begin{center}\input{table_upmc_short.tex}\end{center} |
---|
173 | \item[Subcontracting] |
---|
174 | No subcontracting costs. |
---|
175 | \item[Travel] |
---|
176 | The travel costs are associated to management and coordination meeting as |
---|
177 | well as participation to conferences. The travel costs are estimated |
---|
178 | to 10\% of the total requested ANR funding. |
---|
179 | \item[Expenses for inward billing] |
---|
180 | The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% |
---|
181 | of the total requested ANR funding. |
---|
182 | \end{description} |
---|
183 | |
---|
184 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
---|
185 | \subsection{Partner 6: \xilinx} |
---|
186 | |
---|
187 | \begin{figure}\leavevmode\center |
---|
188 | \input{table_xilinx_full.tex} |
---|
189 | \caption{\label{ress-detail-xilinx}Man power in $mm$ for the delivrables of \xilinx.} |
---|
190 | \end{figure} |
---|
191 | \begin{description} |
---|
192 | \item[Equipment] |
---|
193 | No specific equipment acquisition is required for this project. |
---|
194 | \item[Personnel costs] |
---|
195 | \xilinx employees involved in the project are permanent Software Engineers. |
---|
196 | The detail by delivrables is given in figure~\ref{ress-detail-xilinx} and |
---|
197 | a sumary by task in the following table. |
---|
198 | \begin{center}\input{table_xilinx_short.tex}\end{center} |
---|
199 | \item[Subcontracting] |
---|
200 | No subcontracting costs. |
---|
201 | \item[Travel] |
---|
202 | The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as participation to |
---|
203 | conferences. The travel costs are estimated to |
---|
204 | 2\% of the total requested ANR funding. |
---|
205 | \item[Expenses for inward billing] none |
---|
206 | \item[Other working costs] none |
---|
207 | \end{description} |
---|
208 | |
---|
209 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
---|
210 | \subsection{Partner 7: \bull} |
---|
211 | |
---|
212 | \begin{description} |
---|
213 | \item[Equipment] |
---|
214 | Acquisition of a FPGA development board will represent the main equipment cost for |
---|
215 | Bull in COACH. It is estimated at about 5\% (tbc) of the total funding. |
---|
216 | \item[Personnel costs] |
---|
217 | A permanent engineer will be assigned full time to the project for a duration of 20 |
---|
218 | months as shown in the table below: |
---|
219 | \begin{center}\input{table_bull_full.tex}\end{center} |
---|
220 | \item[Subcontracting] |
---|
221 | No subcontracting costs. |
---|
222 | \item[Travel] |
---|
223 | Application of a standard 10\% of the total funding to travel costs. |
---|
224 | \item[Expenses for inward billing] |
---|
225 | Costs justified by inward billing are estimated to about 5\% of the total funding. |
---|
226 | \item[Other working costs] none |
---|
227 | \end{description} |
---|
228 | |
---|
229 | |
---|
230 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
---|
231 | \subsection{Partner 8: \thales} |
---|
232 | |
---|
233 | \begin{description} |
---|
234 | \item[Equipment] |
---|
235 | In order to validate the design flow,TRT will buy FPGA developpement boards. The cost |
---|
236 | for these FPGA boards is estimated to 20 k\euro (6\% of the total ANR funding). |
---|
237 | \item[Personnel costs] |
---|
238 | The effort to adapt SPEAR DE to generate the input files to COACH framework is |
---|
239 | estimated to 13 man.months. |
---|
240 | The effort to describe and develop the application is estimated to 14 man.month. |
---|
241 | Finally we need one man.month for the partiticipation to the global specification in task 2. |
---|
242 | \begin{center}\input{table_thales_full.tex}\end{center} |
---|
243 | \item[Subcontracting] |
---|
244 | No subcontracting costs. |
---|
245 | \item[Travel] |
---|
246 | The travel costs are associated to meeting, plenaries as well as participation to |
---|
247 | conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 10 k\euro. The travel costs are estimated to |
---|
248 | 5\% of the total requested ANR funding. |
---|
249 | \item[Expenses for inward billing] none |
---|
250 | \item[Other working costs] none |
---|
251 | \end{description} |
---|
252 | |
---|
253 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
---|
254 | \subsection{Partner 9: \zied} |
---|
255 | |
---|
256 | \begin{center}\input{table_zied_full.tex}\end{center} |
---|
257 | |
---|
258 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
---|
259 | \subsection{Partner 10: \navtel} |
---|
260 | |
---|
261 | \begin{description} |
---|
262 | \item[Equipment] |
---|
263 | Navtel will use FPGA board with ARM processors for the validation. |
---|
264 | The costs for depreciation of the board and the instrument of test |
---|
265 | are evaluated to 7\% of the total requested ANR funding. |
---|
266 | \item[Personnel costs] |
---|
267 | A permanent engineer will be assigned on average 1/3 time for |
---|
268 | all the duration of the project. |
---|
269 | The table below shows the estimated manpower cost in months for the delivrables. |
---|
270 | \begin{center}\input{table_navtel_full.tex}\end{center} |
---|
271 | \item[Subcontracting] |
---|
272 | No subcontracting costs. |
---|
273 | \item[Travel] |
---|
274 | The travel costs are associated to meeting, plenaries as well as participation to |
---|
275 | conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 3 k\euro. |
---|
276 | \item[Expenses for inward billing] none |
---|
277 | \item[Other working costs] none |
---|
278 | \end{description} |
---|