source: anr/section-7.tex @ 155

Last change on this file since 155 was 155, checked in by coach, 14 years ago

INRIA/COMPSYS -> LIP

File size: 12.0 KB
Line 
1\def\resstablestyletitle#1{\begin{small}{\textit{#1}}\end{small}}
2
3%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
4\subsection{Partner 1: \irisa}
5
6\begin{figure}\leavevmode\center
7\input{table_inria_cairn_full.tex}
8\caption{\label{ress-detail-irisa}Man power in $mm$ for the deliverables of \irisa.}
9\end{figure}
10\begin{description}
11\item [Equipment]
12No specific equipment acquisition.
13\item [Personnel costs] The faculty members involved in the project
14  are François Charot (INRIA researcher) Steven Derrien (associate
15  professor) and Charles Wagner (research engineer). The non-permanent
16  personal required is a PhD student that will mainly work on ASIP
17  generation. We are looking for a profile with strong informatic skills
18  and good knowledge in computer architecture.
19
20The table below summarizes the manpower by tasks for both permanent and non-permanent
21personnels. The detail by deliverables is given in figure~\ref{ress-detail-irisa}.
22The non-permanent personnels costs represent \mustbecompleted{??\%} of the personnal
23costs. The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 100\% of
24the total ANR requested funding.
25    \begin{center}\input{table_inria_cairn_short.tex}\end{center}
26
27\item [Subcontracting]
28No subcontracting costs.
29\item [Travel]
30The travel costs are associated to project meeting as
31well as participation to conferences. The travel costs are estimated
32to \mustbecompleted{??\%} of the total requested ANR funding.
33\item [Expenses for inward billing]
34The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\%
35of the total requested ANR funding.\\
36\end{description}
37
38
39\subsection{Partner 2: \lip}
40
41\begin{description}
42\item [Equipment]
43No specific equipment acquisition.
44\item [Personnel costs]
45The faculty members involved in the project are an emeritus professor at ENS
46Lyon (Paul Feautrier) and a research associate (CR2) at INRIA
47Rh\^one-Alpes (Christophe Alias). The non-permanent personal required
48is a PhD student that will work on network process generation from
49polyhedral loops, then on extensions to non-polyhedral loops. We are
50looking for a student with both theoretical and practical skills, that
51will be able to get a sufficient understanding of the polyhedral
52techniques and to produce a working implementation.
53
54The table below summarizes the man power by deliverables and tasks for both permanent and
55non-permanent personnels.
56The non-permanent personnels costs represent \mustbecompleted{??\%} of the personnal
57costs. The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 100\% of
58the total ANR requested funding.
59    \begin{center}\input{table_inria_compsys_full.tex}\end{center}
60
61\item [Subcontracting]
62No subcontracting costs.
63\item [Travel]
64The travel costs are associated to project meeting as
65well as participation to conferences. The travel costs are estimated
66to \mustbecompleted{??\%} of the total requested ANR funding.
67\item [Expenses for inward billing]
68The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\%
69of the total requested ANR funding.\\
70\end{description}
71
72
73%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
74\subsection{Partner 3: \tima}
75\begin{figure}\leavevmode\center
76\input{table_tima_full.tex}
77\caption{\label{ress-detail-tima}Man power in $mm$ for the deliverables of \tima.}
78\end{figure}
79\begin{description}
80\item [Equipment]
81No specific equipment acquisition.
82\item [Personnel costs]
83The permanent personnels involved in the project are professor and
84assistant professor (Fr\'ed\'eric P\'etrot and Olivier Muller).
85The non permanent personnels are Phd students and post-doc researchers.
86Related costs are estimated in men per months.
87One phd student (Adrien Prost-Boucle), funded by the
88french ministry of research,
89will be working on the project.
90One 100\% funded phd student will be hired in september 2010. A post-doc researcher
91will be hired at the end of 2011 for one year and an half.
92The PhD student will mainly work on the evolution of UGH HLS tool. Thus, we
93are looking for a profile with strong informatic skills and good knowledge in
94computer architecture.
95The post-doc will mainly work on dynamic reconfiguration and HPC. The required
96profile will be more oriented on computer architecture and advanced digital design.
97
98The table below sumarizes the man power by task for both permanent and non-permanent
99personnels. The detail by deliverables is given in figure~\ref{ress-detail-tima}.
100The requested funding for personnels represent 50\% of the total personnal costs.
101The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 85\% of the total ANR
102requested funding.
103\begin{center}\input{table_tima_short.tex}\end{center}
104\item [Subcontracting]
105No subcontracting costs.
106\item [Travel]
107The travel costs are associated to project meeting as
108well as participation to conferences. The travel costs are estimated
109to 11\% of the total requested ANR funding.
110\item [Expenses for inward billing]
111The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\%
112of the total requested ANR funding.\\
113\end{description}
114
115%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
116\subsection{Partner 4: \ubs}
117\begin{figure}\leavevmode\center
118\input{table_ubs_full.tex}
119\caption{\label{ress-detail-ubs}Man power in $mm$ for the deliverables of \ubs.}
120\end{figure}
121
122\begin {description}
123\item [Equipment]
124In order to validate the design flow project, the LabSTICC  laboratory will buy FPGA developpement boards.
125The cost for these FPGA boards is estimated to 3\% of the total ANR funding.
126\item [Personnel costs]
127The faculty members involved in the project are
128associate professors (Philippe COUSSY, Cyrille CHAVET) or research engineers (Dominique HELLER).
129All non-permanent personnel costs are estimated in men*months
130for senior researchers (post-doc or research engineers).
131
132The table below sumarizes the man power by task for both permanent and non-permanent
133personnels. The detail by deliverables is given in figure~\ref {ress-detail-ubs}.
134The non-permanent personnels costs represent 50\% of the personnal costs.
135The requested funding for non permanent personnels is about 83\% of the total ANR
136requested funding.
137\begin{center}\input{table_ubs_short.tex}\end{center}
138\item [Subcontracting]
139No subcontracting costs.
140\item [Travel]
141The travel costs are associated to management and meeting as
142well as participation to conferences. The travel costs are estimated
143to 10\% of the total requested ANR funding.
144\item [Expenses for inward billing]
145The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\%
146of the total requested ANR funding.
147\end {description}
148
149
150%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
151\subsection{Partner 5: \upmc}
152\begin{figure}\leavevmode\center
153\input{table_upmc_full.tex}
154\caption{\label{ress-detail-upmc}Man power in $mm$ for the deliverables of \upmc.}
155\end{figure}
156\begin{description}
157\item[Equipment]
158    No specific equipment acquisition is required for this project.
159    The costs for depreciation of workstations
160    and pre-existing FPGA boards are evaluated to 7\% of the total
161    requested ANR funding.
162\item[Personnel costs]
163    The permanent personnels involved in the project are professors or
164    assistant processors (Alain Greiner and Ivan Aug\'e).
165    All non permanent personnel costs are estimated in men*months
166    for senior researchers (post-doc or research engineers).
167    The table below sumarizes the man power by task for both permanent  and non-permanent
168    personnels. The detail by deliverables is given in figure~\ref{ress-detail-upmc}.
169    The non-permanent personnels costs represent 50\% of the personnal costs.
170    The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 79\% of the total ANR
171    requested funding.
172    \begin{center}\input{table_upmc_short.tex}\end{center}
173\item[Subcontracting]
174    No subcontracting costs.
175\item[Travel]
176    The travel costs are associated to management and coordination meeting as
177    well as participation to conferences. The travel costs are estimated
178    to 10\% of the total requested ANR funding.
179\item[Expenses for inward billing]
180    The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\%
181    of the total requested ANR funding.
182\end{description}
183
184%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
185\subsection{Partner 6: \xilinx}
186
187\begin{figure}\leavevmode\center
188\input{table_xilinx_full.tex}
189\caption{\label{ress-detail-xilinx}Man power in $mm$ for the deliverables of \xilinx.}
190\end{figure}
191\begin{description}
192\item[Equipment]
193    No specific equipment acquisition is required for this project.
194\item[Personnel costs]
195    \xilinx employees involved in the project are permanent Software Engineers.
196    The detail by deliverables is given in figure~\ref{ress-detail-xilinx} and
197    a sumary by task in the following table.
198    \begin{center}\input{table_xilinx_short.tex}\end{center}
199\item[Subcontracting]
200    No subcontracting costs.
201\item[Travel]
202    The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as participation to
203    conferences. The travel costs are estimated to
204    2\% of the total requested ANR funding.
205\item[Expenses for inward billing] none
206\item[Other working costs] none
207\end{description}
208
209%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
210\subsection{Partner 7: \bull}
211
212\begin{description}
213\item[Equipment]
214    Acquisition of a FPGA development board will represent the main equipment cost for
215    Bull in COACH. It is estimated at about 5\% (tbc) of the total funding.
216\item[Personnel costs]
217    A permanent engineer will be assigned full time to the project for a duration of 20
218    months as shown in the table below:
219    \begin{center}\input{table_bull_full.tex}\end{center}
220\item[Subcontracting]
221    No subcontracting costs.
222\item[Travel]
223    Application of a standard 10\% of the total funding to travel costs.
224\item[Expenses for inward billing]
225    Costs justified by inward billing are estimated to about 5\% of the total funding.
226\item[Other working costs] none
227\end{description}
228
229
230%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
231\subsection{Partner 8: \thales}
232
233\begin{description}
234\item[Equipment]
235    In order to validate the design flow,TRT will buy FPGA developpement boards. The cost
236    for these FPGA boards is estimated to 20 k\euro (6\% of the total ANR funding).
237\item[Personnel costs]
238    The effort to adapt SPEAR DE to generate the input files to COACH framework is
239    estimated to 13 man.months.
240    The effort to describe and develop the application is estimated to 14 man.month.
241    Finally we need one man.month for the partiticipation to the global specification in task 2.
242    \begin{center}\input{table_thales_full.tex}\end{center}
243\item[Subcontracting]
244    No subcontracting costs.
245\item[Travel]
246    The travel costs are associated to meeting, plenaries as well as participation to
247    conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 10 k\euro. The travel costs are estimated to
248    5\% of the total requested ANR funding.
249\item[Expenses for inward billing] none
250\item[Other working costs] none
251\end{description}
252
253%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
254\subsection{Partner 9: \zied}
255
256  \begin{center}\input{table_zied_full.tex}\end{center}
257
258%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
259\subsection{Partner 10: \navtel}
260
261\begin{description}
262\item[Equipment]
263    Navtel will use FPGA board with ARM processors for the validation.
264    The costs for depreciation of the board and the instrument of test
265    are evaluated to 7\% of the total requested ANR funding.
266\item[Personnel costs]
267    A permanent engineer will be assigned on average 1/3 time for
268        all the duration of the project.
269    The table below shows the estimated manpower cost in months for the deliverables.
270    \begin{center}\input{table_navtel_full.tex}\end{center}
271\item[Subcontracting]
272    No subcontracting costs.
273\item[Travel]
274    The travel costs are associated to meeting, plenaries as well as participation to
275    conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 3 k\euro.
276\item[Expenses for inward billing] none
277\item[Other working costs] none
278\end{description}
Note: See TracBrowser for help on using the repository browser.