source: anr/section-7.tex @ 131

Last change on this file since 131 was 131, checked in by coach, 15 years ago

Paul Révision dela section 7.

File size: 12.2 KB
Line 
1\def\resstablestyletitle#1{\begin{small}{\textit{#1}}\end{small}}
2
3%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
4\subsection{Partner 1: \irisa}
5
6\begin{figure}\leavevmode\center
7\input{table_inria_cairn_full.tex}
8\caption{\label{ress-detail-irisa}Man power in $mm$ for the delivrables of \irisa.}
9\end{figure}
10\begin{description}
11\item [Equipment]
12No specific equipment acquisition.
13\item [Personnel costs] The faculty members involved in the project
14  are François Charot (INRIA researcher) Steven Derrien (associate
15  professor) and Charles Wagner (research engineer). The non-permanent
16  personal required is a PhD student that will mainly work on ASIP
17  generation. We are looking for a profile with strong informatic skills
18  and good knowledge in computer architecture.
19
20The table below summarizes the manpower by task for both permanent and
21non-permanent personnels. The detail by delivrables is given in
22figure~\ref{ress-detail-irisa}.
23The non-permanent personnels costs represent ??\% of the personnal
24costs. The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 100\% of
25the total ANR requested funding.
26    \begin{center}\input{table_inria_cairn_short.tex}\end{center}
27
28\item [Subcontracting]
29No subcontracting costs.
30\item [Travel]
31The travel costs are associated to project meeting as
32well as participation to conferences. The travel costs are estimated
33to ??\% of the total requested ANR funding.
34\item [Expenses for inward billing]
35The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\%
36of the total requested ANR funding.\\
37\end{description}
38
39
40\subsection{Partner 2: \lip}
41
42\begin{figure}\leavevmode\center
43\input{table_lip_full.tex}
44\caption{\label{ress-detail-lip}Man power in $mm$ for the delivrables of \lip.}
45\end{figure}
46
47\begin{description}
48\item [Equipment]
49No specific equipment acquisition.
50\item [Personnel costs]
51The faculty members involved in the project are a professor at ENS
52Lyon (Paul Feautrier) and a research associate (CR2) at INRIA
53Rh\^one-Alpes (Christophe Alias). The non-permanent personal required
54is a PhD student that will work on network process generation from
55polyhedral loops, then on extensions to non-polyhedral loops. We are
56looking for a student with both theoretical and practical skills, that
57will be able to get a sufficient understanding of the polyhedral
58techniques and to produce a working implementation.
59
60The table below summarizes the man power by task for both permanent and
61non-permanent personnels. The detail by delivrables is given in
62figure~\ref{ress-detail-lip}.
63The non-permanent personnels costs represent ??\% of the personnal
64costs. The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 100\% of
65the total ANR requested funding.
66    \begin{center}\input{table_lip_short.tex}\end{center}
67
68\item [Subcontracting]
69No subcontracting costs.
70\item [Travel]
71The travel costs are associated to project meeting as
72well as participation to conferences. The travel costs are estimated
73to ??\% of the total requested ANR funding.
74\item [Expenses for inward billing]
75The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\%
76of the total requested ANR funding.\\
77\end{description}
78
79
80%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
81\subsection{Partner 3: \tima}
82\begin{figure}\leavevmode\center
83\input{table_tima_full.tex}
84\caption{\label{ress-detail-tima}Man power in $mm$ for the delivrables of \tima.}
85\end{figure}
86\begin{description}
87\item [Equipment]
88No specific equipment acquisition.
89\item [Personnel costs]
90The permanent personnels involved in the project are professor and
91assistant professor (Fr\'ed\'eric P\'etrot and Olivier Muller).
92The non permanent personnels are Phd students and post-doc researchers.
93Related costs are estimated in men per months.
94One phd student (Adrien Prost-Boucle), funded by the
95french ministry of research,
96will be working on the project.
97One 100\% funded phd student will be hired in september 2010. A post-doc researcher
98will be hired at the end of 2011 for one year and an half.
99The PhD student will mainly work on the evolution of UGH HLS tool. Thus, we
100are looking for a profile with strong informatic skills and good knowledge in
101computer architecture.
102The post-doc will mainly work on dynamic reconfiguration and HPC. The required
103profile will be more oriented on computer architecture and advanced digital design.
104
105The table below sumarizes the man power by task for both permanent and non-permanent
106personnels. The detail by delivrables is given in figure~\ref{ress-detail-tima}.
107The requested funding for personnels represent 50\% of the total personnal costs.
108The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 85\% of the total ANR
109requested funding.
110\begin{center}\input{table_tima_short.tex}\end{center}
111\item [Subcontracting]
112No subcontracting costs.
113\item [Travel]
114The travel costs are associated to project meeting as
115well as participation to conferences. The travel costs are estimated
116to 11\% of the total requested ANR funding.
117\item [Expenses for inward billing]
118The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\%
119of the total requested ANR funding.\\
120\end{description}
121
122%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
123\subsection{Partner 4: \ubs}
124\begin{figure}\leavevmode\center
125\input{table_ubs_full.tex}
126\caption{\label{ress-detail-ubs}Man power in $mm$ for the delivrables of \ubs.}
127\end{figure}
128
129\begin {description}
130\item [Equipment]
131In order to validate the design flow project, the LabSTICC  laboratory will buy FPGA developpement boards.
132The cost for these FPGA boards is estimated to 3\% of the total ANR funding.
133\item [Personnel costs]
134The faculty members involved in the project are
135associate professors (Philippe COUSSY, Cyrille CHAVET) or research engineers (Dominique HELLER).
136All non-permanent personnel costs are estimated in men*months
137for senior researchers (post-doc or research engineers).
138
139The table below sumarizes the man power by task for both permanent and non-permanent
140personnels. The detail by delivrables is given in figure~\ref {ress-detail-ubs}.
141The non-permanent personnels costs represent 50\% of the personnal costs.
142The requested funding for non permanent personnels is about 83\% of the total ANR
143requested funding.
144\begin{center}\input{table_ubs_short.tex}\end{center}
145\item [Subcontracting]
146No subcontracting costs.
147\item [Travel]
148The travel costs are associated to management and meeting as
149well as participation to conferences. The travel costs are estimated
150to 10\% of the total requested ANR funding.
151\item [Expenses for inward billing]
152The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\%
153of the total requested ANR funding.
154\end {description}
155
156
157%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
158\subsection{Partner 5: \upmc}
159\begin{figure}\leavevmode\center
160\input{table_upmc_full.tex}
161\caption{\label{ress-detail-upmc}Man power in $mm$ for the delivrables of \upmc.}
162\end{figure}
163\begin{description}
164\item[Equipment]
165    No specific equipment acquisition is required for this project.
166    The costs for depreciation of workstations
167    and pre-existing FPGA boards are evaluated to 7\% of the total
168    requested ANR funding.
169\item[Personnel costs]
170    The permanent personnels involved in the project are professors or
171    assistant processors (Alain Greiner and Ivan Aug\'e).
172    All non permanent personnel costs are estimated in men*months
173    for senior researchers (post-doc or research engineers).
174    The table below sumarizes the man power by task for both permanent  and non-permanent
175    personnels. The detail by delivrables is given in figure~\ref{ress-detail-upmc}.
176    The non-permanent personnels costs represent 50\% of the personnal costs.
177    The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 79\% of the total ANR
178    requested funding.
179    \begin{center}\input{table_upmc_short.tex}\end{center}
180\item[Subcontracting]
181    No subcontracting costs.
182\item[Travel]
183    The travel costs are associated to management and coordination meeting as
184    well as participation to conferences. The travel costs are estimated
185    to 10\% of the total requested ANR funding.
186\item[Expenses for inward billing]
187    The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\%
188    of the total requested ANR funding.
189\end{description}
190
191%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
192\subsection{Partner 6: \xilinx}
193
194\begin{figure}\leavevmode\center
195\input{table_xilinx_full.tex}
196\caption{\label{ress-detail-xilinx}Man power in $mm$ for the delivrables of \xilinx.}
197\end{figure}
198\begin{description}
199\item[Equipment]
200    No specific equipment acquisition is required for this project.
201\item[Personnel costs]
202    \xilinx employees involved in the project are permanent Software Engineers.
203    The detail by delivrables is given in figure~\ref{ress-detail-xilinx} and
204    a sumary by task in the following table.
205    \begin{center}\input{table_xilinx_short.tex}\end{center}
206\item[Subcontracting]
207    No subcontracting costs.
208\item[Travel]
209    The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as participation to
210    conferences. The travel costs are estimated to
211    \mustbecompleted{FIXME:\xilinx: XX\%} of the total requested ANR funding.
212\item[Expenses for inward billing] none
213\item[Other working costs] none
214\end{description}
215
216%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
217\subsection{Partner 7: \bull}
218
219\begin{description}
220\item[Equipment]
221    Acquisition of a FPGA development board will represent the main equipment cost for
222    Bull in COACH. It is estimated at about 5\% (tbc) of the total funding.
223\item[Personnel costs]
224    A permanent engineer will be assigned full time to the project for a duration of 20
225    months as shown in the table below:
226    \begin{center}\input{table_bull_full.tex}\end{center}
227\item[Subcontracting]
228    No subcontracting costs.
229\item[Travel]
230    Application of a standard 10\% of the total funding to travel costs.
231\item[Expenses for inward billing]
232    Costs justified by inward billing are estimated to about 5\% of the total funding.
233\item[Other working costs] none
234\end{description}
235
236
237%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
238\subsection{Partner 8: \thales}
239
240\begin{description}
241\item[Equipment]
242    In order to validate the design flow,TRT will buy FPGA developpement boards. The cost
243    for these FPGA boards is estimated to 20 k\euro (6\% of the total ANR funding).
244\item[Personnel costs]
245    The effort to adapt SPEAR DE to generate the input files to COACH framework is
246    estimated to 13 man.months.
247    The effort to describe and develop the application is estimated to 14 man.month.
248    Finally we need one man.month for the partiticipation to the global specification in task 2.
249    \begin{center}\input{table_thales_full.tex}\end{center}
250\item[Subcontracting]
251    No subcontracting costs.
252\item[Travel]
253    The travel costs are associated to meeting, plenaries as well as participation to
254    conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 10 k\euro. The travel costs are estimated to
255    5\% of the total requested ANR funding.
256\item[Expenses for inward billing] none
257\item[Other working costs] none
258\end{description}
259
260%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
261\subsection{Partner 9: \zied}
262
263  \begin{center}\input{table_zied_full.tex}\end{center}
264
265%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
266\subsection{Partner 10: \navtel}
267
268\begin{description}
269\item[Equipment]
270    Navtel will use FPGA board with ARM processors for the validation.
271    The costs for depreciation of the board and the instrument of test
272    are evaluated to 7\% of the total requested ANR funding.
273\item[Personnel costs]
274    A permanent engineer will be assigned on average 1/3 time for
275        all the duration of the project.
276    The table below shows the estimated manpower cost in months for the delivrables.
277    \begin{center}\input{table_navtel_full.tex}\end{center}
278\item[Subcontracting]
279    No subcontracting costs.
280\item[Travel]
281    The travel costs are associated to meeting, plenaries as well as participation to
282    conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 3 k\euro.
283\item[Expenses for inward billing] none
284\item[Other working costs] none
285\end{description}
Note: See TracBrowser for help on using the repository browser.