source: anr/section-7.tex @ 173

Last change on this file since 173 was 167, checked in by coach, 15 years ago

Ajout Christophe

File size: 12.9 KB
Line 
1\def\resstablestyletitle#1{\begin{small}{\textit{#1}}\end{small}}
2
3%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
4\subsection{Partner 1: \irisa}
5
6\begin{description}
7\item [Equipment]
8  No specific equipment acquisition.
9\item [Personnel costs] The faculty members involved in the project
10  are François Charot (INRIA researcher) Steven Derrien (associate
11  professor) and Charles Wagner (research engineer). The non-permanent
12  personal required is a PhD student that will mainly work on ASIP
13  generation. We are looking for a profile with strong informatic skills
14  and good knowledge in computer architecture.
15  \parlf
16  The table below summarizes the manpower in \hommemois by tasks for both permanent and
17  non-permanent personnels. The detail by deliverables is given in
18  figure~\ref{table-livrables-1}.
19  The non-permanent personnels costs represent \mustbecompleted{??\%} of the personnal
20  costs. The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 100\% of
21  the total ANR requested funding.
22    \begin{center}\input{table_inria_cairn_short.tex}\end{center}
23\item [Subcontracting]
24  No subcontracting costs.
25\item [Travel]
26  The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as participation to
27  conferences. The travel costs are estimated to \mustbecompleted{??\%} of the total
28  requested ANR funding.
29\item [Expenses for inward billing]
30  The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% of the total
31  requested ANR funding.
32\end{description}
33
34
35\subsection{Partner 2: \lip}
36\begin{figure}\leavevmode\center
37\input{table_lip_full.tex}
38\caption{\label{ress-detail-lip}Man power in $mm$ for the deliverables of \lip.}
39\end{figure}
40\begin{description}
41\item [Equipment]
42  No specific equipment acquisition. The costs for depreciation of
43  workstations is evaluated to 4\% of the total requested ANR funding.
44\item [Personnel costs]
45  The faculty members involved in the project are an emeritus
46  professor at ENS Lyon (Paul Feautrier) and a research associate
47  (CR2) at INRIA Rh\^one-Alpes (Christophe Alias).  The non-permanent
48  personal required is a PhD student that will work on network process
49  generation from polyhedral loops, then on extensions to
50  non-polyhedral loops.  We are looking for a student with both
51  theoretical and practical skills, that will be able to get a
52  sufficient understanding of the polyhedral techniques and to produce
53  a working implementation.
54  \parlf
55  The table below summarizes the \hommemois in man-months by
56  deliverables and tasks for both permanent and non-permanent
57  personnels.  The non-permanent personnels costs represent 23\% of
58  the personnal costs. The requested funding for non
59  permanent personnels is 100\% of the total ANR requested funding.
60  \begin{center}\input{table_lip_short.tex}\end{center}
61\item [Subcontracting]
62  No subcontracting costs.
63\item [Travel]
64  The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as
65  participation to conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 20\%
66  of the total requested ANR funding.
67\item [Expenses for inward billing]
68  The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated
69  to 4\% of the total requested ANR funding.
70\end{description}
71
72%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
73\subsection{Partner 3: \tima}
74
75\begin{description}
76\item [Equipment]
77  No specific equipment acquisition.
78\item [Personnel costs]
79  The permanent personnels involved in the project are professor and assistant professor
80  (Fr\'ed\'eric P\'etrot and Olivier Muller).
81  The non permanent personnels are Phd students and post-doc researchers.
82  Related costs are estimated in \hommemois.
83  One phd student (Adrien Prost-Boucle), funded by the french ministry of research, will
84  be working on the project.
85  One 100\% funded phd student will be hired in september 2010. A post-doc researcher will
86  be hired at the end of 2011 for one year and an half.
87  The PhD student will mainly work on the evolution of UGH HLS tool. Thus, we are looking
88  for a profile with strong informatic skills and good knowledge in computer architecture.
89  The post-doc will mainly work on dynamic reconfiguration and HPC. The required profile
90  will be more oriented on computer architecture and advanced digital design.
91  \parlf
92  The table below sumarizes the man power in \hommemois by tasks for both permanent and
93  non-permanent personnels. The detail by deliverables is given in
94  figure~\ref{table-livrables-1}.
95  The requested funding for personnels represent 50\% of the total personnal costs.
96  The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 85\% of the total ANR requested
97  funding.
98    \begin{center}\input{table_tima_short.tex}\end{center}
99\item [Subcontracting]
100  No subcontracting costs.
101\item [Travel]
102  The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as participation to
103  conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 11\% of the total requested ANR funding.
104\item [Expenses for inward billing]
105  The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% of the total
106  requested ANR funding.
107\end{description}
108
109%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
110\subsection{Partner 4: \ubs}
111
112\begin {description}
113\item [Equipment]
114  In order to validate the design flow project, the LabSTICC  laboratory will buy FPGA
115  developpement boards.  The cost for these FPGA boards is estimated to 3\% of the total
116  ANR funding.
117\item [Personnel costs]
118  The faculty members involved in the project are associate professors (Philippe COUSSY,
119  Cyrille CHAVET) or research engineers (Dominique HELLER). All non-permanent personnel
120  costs are estimated in \hommemois for senior researchers (post-doc or research
121  engineers).
122  \parlf
123  The table below sumarizes the man power in \hommemois by tasks for both permanent and
124  non-permanent personnels. The detail by deliverables is given in
125  figure~\ref{table-livrables-2}.
126  The non-permanent personnels costs represent 50\% of the personnal costs.
127  The requested funding for non permanent personnels is about 83\% of the total ANR
128  requested funding.
129    \begin{center}\input{table_ubs_short.tex}\end{center}
130\item [Subcontracting]
131  No subcontracting costs.
132\item [Travel]
133  The travel costs are associated to management and meeting as well as participation to
134  conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 10\% of the total requested ANR funding.
135\item [Expenses for inward billing]
136  The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% of the total
137  requested ANR funding.
138\end {description}
139
140
141%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
142\subsection{Partner 5: \upmc}
143
144\begin{description}
145\item[Equipment]
146    No specific equipment acquisition is required for this project.
147    The costs for depreciation of workstations and pre-existing FPGA boards are evaluated
148    to 7\% of the total requested ANR funding.
149\item[Personnel costs]
150    The permanent personnels involved in the project are professors or assistant
151    processors (Alain Greiner and Ivan Aug\'e).
152    All non permanent personnel costs are estimated in \hommemois for senior researchers
153    (post-doc or research engineers).
154    The table below sumarizes the man power by tasks in \hommemois for both permanent  and
155    non-permanent personnels.
156    The detail by deliverables is given in figure~\ref{table-livrables-2}.
157    The non-permanent personnels costs represent 50\% of the personnal costs.
158    The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 79\% of the total ANR
159    requested funding.
160    \begin{center}\input{table_upmc_short.tex}\end{center}
161\item[Subcontracting]
162    No subcontracting costs.
163\item[Travel]
164    The travel costs are associated to management and coordination meeting as
165    well as participation to conferences. The travel costs are estimated
166    to 10\% of the total requested ANR funding.
167\item[Expenses for inward billing]
168    The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\%
169    of the total requested ANR funding.
170\end{description}
171
172%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
173\subsection{Partner 6: \xilinx}
174
175\begin{description}
176\item[Equipment]
177  No specific equipment acquisition is required for this project.
178\item[Personnel costs]
179  \xilinx employees involved in the project are permanent Software Engineers.
180  The man power detail in \hommemois by deliverables is given in
181  figure~\ref{table-livrables-1} and a sumary by task in the following table.
182  \begin{center}\input{table_xilinx_short.tex}\end{center}
183\item[Subcontracting]
184  No subcontracting costs.
185\item[Travel]
186  The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as participation to
187  conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 2\% of the total requested ANR funding.
188\item[Expenses for inward billing] none
189\item[Other working costs] none
190\end{description}
191
192%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
193\subsection{Partner 7: \bull}
194
195\begin{description}
196\item[Equipment]
197    Acquisition of a FPGA development board will represent the main equipment cost for
198    Bull in COACH. It is estimated at about 5\% (tbc) of the total funding.
199\item[Personnel costs]
200    A permanent engineer will be assigned full time to the project for a duration of 20
201    months as shown in the table below that gives the man power in \hommemois:
202    \begin{center}\input{table_bull_full.tex}\end{center}
203\item[Subcontracting]
204    No subcontracting costs.
205\item[Travel]
206    Application of a standard 10\% of the total funding to travel costs.
207\item[Expenses for inward billing]
208    Costs justified by inward billing are estimated to about 5\% of the total funding.
209\item[Other working costs] none
210\end{description}
211
212
213%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
214\subsection{Partner 8: \thales}
215
216\begin{description}
217\item[Equipment]
218    In order to validate the design flow,TRT will buy FPGA developpement boards. The cost
219    for these FPGA boards is estimated to 20 k\euro (6\% of the total ANR funding).
220\item[Personnel costs]
221    The effort to adapt SPEAR DE to generate the input files to COACH framework is
222    estimated to 13 \hommemois.
223    The effort to describe and develop the application is estimated to 14 \hommemois.
224    Finally we need one \hommemois for the partiticipation to the global specification in task 2.
225    This is sumarized in the table below:
226    \begin{center}\input{table_thales_full.tex}\end{center}
227\item[Subcontracting]
228    No subcontracting costs.
229\item[Travel]
230    The travel costs are associated to meeting, plenaries as well as participation to
231    conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 10 k\euro. The travel costs are estimated to
232    5\% of the total requested ANR funding.
233\item[Expenses for inward billing] none
234\item[Other working costs] none
235\end{description}
236
237%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
238\subsection{Partner 9: \zied}
239
240  \begin{center}\input{table_zied_full.tex}\end{center}
241
242%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
243\subsection{Partner 10: \navtel}
244
245\begin{description}
246\item[Equipment]
247    Navtel will use FPGA board with ARM processors for the validation.
248    The costs for depreciation of the board and the instrument of test
249    are evaluated to 7\% of the total requested ANR funding.
250\item[Personnel costs]
251    A permanent engineer will be assigned on average 1/3 time for
252        all the duration of the project.
253    The table below shows the estimated manpower cost in \hommemois for the deliverables.
254    \begin{center}\input{table_navtel_full.tex}\end{center}
255\item[Subcontracting]
256    No subcontracting costs.
257\item[Travel]
258    The travel costs are associated to meeting, plenaries as well as participation to
259    conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 3 k\euro.
260\item[Expenses for inward billing] none
261\item[Other working costs] none
262\end{description}
263%
264\begin{landscape}
265\begin{figure}
266\begin{small}
267\settowidth\desclen{XILINX RTL optimisation (5)}
268\def\resstablestyletitle#1{\parbox{\desclen}{\textit{#1}}}
269\begin{minipage}[b]{.47\linewidth}\center
270\input{table_inria_cairn_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex}\\  \irisa  \vspace{2.5ex}\\
271\input{table_xilinx_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex}\\       \xilinx\\
272\end{minipage}\hfill\begin{minipage}[b]{.47\linewidth}\center
273\input{table_tima_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex} \\ \tima
274\end{minipage}
275\end{small}
276\caption{\label{table-livrables-1} Man power in \hommemois for the deliverables (1)}
277\end{figure}
278%
279\begin{figure}
280\begin{small}
281\settowidth\desclen{XILINX RTL optimisation (5)}
282\def\resstablestyletitle#1{\parbox{\desclen}{\textit{#1}}}
283\begin{minipage}[b]{.47\linewidth}\center
284\input{table_ubs_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex}\\     \ubs    \vspace{2.5ex}\\
285%\input{table_thales_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex}\\  \thales \\
286\end{minipage}\hfill\begin{minipage}[b]{.47\linewidth}\center
287\input{table_upmc_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex} \\   \upmc
288\end{minipage}
289\end{small}
290\caption{\label{table-livrables-2} Man power in \hommemois for the deliverables (2)}
291\end{figure}
292\end{landscape}
Note: See TracBrowser for help on using the repository browser.