source: anr/section-7.tex @ 279

Last change on this file since 279 was 278, checked in by coach, 14 years ago

Reduced the task number. Suppressed xilinx, navtel and flexra. Added mds.

File size: 11.8 KB
Line 
1\def\resstablestyletitle#1{\begin{small}{\textit{#1}}\end{small}}
2
3%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
4\subsection{Partner 1: \irisa}
5
6\begin{description}
7\item [Equipment]
8  No specific equipment acquisition.
9\item [Personnel costs] The faculty members involved in the project
10  are François Charot (INRIA researcher), Steven Derrien (associate
11  professor), Christophe Wolinski (professor) and Charles Wagner
12  (research engineer). The non-permanent personal required is a PhD
13  student that will mainly work on ASIP generation. We are looking for
14  a profile with strong informatic skills and good knowledge in
15  computer architecture.
16  \parlf
17  The table below summarizes the manpower in \hommemois by tasks for both permanent and
18  non-permanent personnels. The detail by deliverables is given in
19  figure~\ref{table-livrables-1}.
20  The non-permanent personnels costs represent {48\%} of the personnal
21  costs. The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 100\% of
22  the total ANR requested funding.
23    \begin{center}\input{table_inria_cairn_short.tex}\end{center}
24\item [Subcontracting]
25  No subcontracting costs.
26\item [Travel]
27  The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as participation to
28  conferences. The travel costs are estimated to {7,5\%} of the total
29  requested ANR funding.
30\item [Expenses for inward billing]
31  The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% of the total
32  requested ANR funding.
33\end{description}
34
35
36\subsection{Partner 2: \lip}
37
38\begin{description}
39\item [Equipment]
40  No specific equipment acquisition. The costs for depreciation of
41  workstations is evaluated to 4\% of the total requested ANR funding.
42\item [Personnel costs]
43  The faculty members involved in the project are an emeritus
44  professor at ENS Lyon (Paul Feautrier) and a research associate
45  (CR2) at INRIA Rh\^one-Alpes (Christophe Alias).  The non-permanent
46  personel required is a PhD student that will work on network process
47  generation from polyhedral loops, then on extensions to
48  non-polyhedral loops.  We are looking for a student with both
49  theoretical and practical skills, that will be able to get a
50  sufficient understanding of the polyhedral techniques and to produce
51  a working implementation.
52  \parlf
53  The table below summarizes the \hommemois by
54  deliverables and tasks for both permanent and non-permanent
55  personnels.  The non-permanent personnels costs represent 26\% of
56  the personnal costs. The requested funding for non
57  permanent personnels is 100\% of the total ANR requested funding.
58  \begin{center}\input{table_inria_compsys_full.tex}\end{center}
59\item [Subcontracting]
60  No subcontracting costs.
61\item [Travel]
62  The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as
63  participation to conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 20\%
64  of the total requested ANR funding.
65\item [Expenses for inward billing]
66  The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated
67  to 4\% of the total requested ANR funding.
68\end{description}
69
70%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
71\subsection{Partner 3: \tima}
72
73\begin{description}
74\item [Equipment]
75  No specific equipment acquisition.
76\item [Personnel costs]
77  The permanent personnels involved in the project are professor and assistant professor
78  (Fr\'ed\'eric P\'etrot and Olivier Muller).
79  The non permanent personnels are Phd students and post-doc researchers.
80  Related costs are estimated in \hommemois.
81  One phd student (Adrien Prost-Boucle), funded by the french ministry of research, will
82  be working on the project.
83  One 100\% funded phd student will be hired in september 2010. A post-doc researcher will
84  be hired at the end of 2011 for one year and an half.
85  The PhD student will mainly work on the evolution of UGH HLS tool. Thus, we are looking
86  for a profile with strong informatic skills and good knowledge in computer architecture.
87  The post-doc will mainly work on dynamic reconfiguration and HPC. The required profile
88  will be more oriented on computer architecture and advanced digital design.
89  \parlf
90  The table below sumarizes the man power in \hommemois by tasks for both permanent and
91  non-permanent personnels. The detail by deliverables is given in
92  figure~\ref{table-livrables-1}.
93  The requested funding for personnels represent 50\% of the total personnal costs.
94  The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 85\% of the total ANR requested
95  funding.
96    \begin{center}\input{table_tima_short.tex}\end{center}
97\item [Subcontracting]
98  No subcontracting costs.
99\item [Travel]
100  The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as participation to
101  conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 11\% of the total requested ANR funding.
102\item [Expenses for inward billing]
103  The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% of the total
104  requested ANR funding.
105\end{description}
106
107%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
108\subsection{Partner 4: \ubs}
109
110\begin {description}
111\item [Equipment]
112  In order to validate the design flow project, the Lab-STICC laboratory will buy FPGA
113  developpement boards.  The cost for these FPGA boards is estimated to 3\% of the total
114  ANR funding.
115\item [Personnel costs]
116  The faculty members involved in the project are associate professors (Philippe COUSSY,
117  Cyrille CHAVET) or research engineers (Dominique HELLER). All non-permanent personnel
118  costs are estimated in \hommemois for senior researchers (post-doc or research
119  engineers).
120  \parlf
121  The table below sumarizes the man power in \hommemois by tasks for both permanent and
122  non-permanent personnels. The detail by deliverables is given in
123  figure~\ref{table-livrables-2}.
124  The non-permanent personnels costs represent 50\% of the personnal costs.
125  The requested funding for non permanent personnels is about 83\% of the total ANR
126  requested funding.
127    \begin{center}\input{table_ubs_short.tex}\end{center}
128\item [Subcontracting]
129  No subcontracting costs.
130\item [Travel]
131  The travel costs are associated to management and meeting as well as participation to
132  conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 10\% of the total requested ANR funding.
133\item [Expenses for inward billing]
134  The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% of the total
135  requested ANR funding.
136\end {description}
137
138
139%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
140\subsection{Partner 5: \upmc}
141
142\begin{description}
143\item[Equipment]
144    No specific equipment acquisition is required for this project.
145    The costs for depreciation of workstations and pre-existing FPGA boards are evaluated
146    to 7\% of the total requested ANR funding.
147\item[Personnel costs]
148    The permanent personnels involved in the project are professors or assistant
149    processors (Alain Greiner and Ivan Aug\'e).
150    All non permanent personnel costs are estimated in \hommemois for senior researchers
151    (post-doc or research engineers).
152    The table below sumarizes the man power by tasks in \hommemois for both permanent  and
153    non-permanent personnels.
154    The detail by deliverables is given in figure~\ref{table-livrables-2}.
155    The non-permanent personnels costs represent 50\% of the personnal costs.
156    The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 79\% of the total ANR
157    requested funding.
158    \begin{center}\input{table_upmc_short.tex}\end{center}
159\item[Subcontracting]
160    No subcontracting costs.
161\item[Travel]
162    The travel costs are associated to management and coordination meeting as
163    well as participation to conferences. The travel costs are estimated
164    to 10\% of the total requested ANR funding.
165\item[Expenses for inward billing]
166    The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\%
167    of the total requested ANR funding.
168\end{description}
169
170%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
171\subsection{Partner 6: \mds}
172
173\begin{ADDEDENV}
174\begin{description}
175\item[Equipment]
176  No specific equipment acquisition is required for this project.
177\item[Personnel costs]
178  \xilinx employees involved in the project are permanent Software Engineers.
179  The man power detail in \hommemois by deliverables is given in
180  figure~\ref{table-livrables-1} and a sumary by task in the following table.
181  \begin{center}\input{table_mds_short.tex}\end{center}
182\item[Subcontracting]
183  No subcontracting costs.
184\item[Travel]
185  The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as participation to
186  conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 2\% of the total requested ANR funding.
187\item[Expenses for inward billing] none
188\item[Other working costs] none
189\end{description}
190\end{ADDEDENV}
191
192%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
193\subsection{Partner 7: \bull}
194
195\begin{description}
196\item[Equipment]
197    Acquisition of a FPGA development board will represent the main equipment cost for
198    Bull in COACH. It is estimated at about 5\% (tbc) of the total funding.
199\item[Personnel costs]
200    A permanent engineer will be assigned full time to the project for a duration of 20
201    months as shown in the table below that gives the man power in \hommemois:
202    \begin{center}\input{table_bull_full.tex}\end{center}
203\item[Subcontracting]
204    No subcontracting costs.
205\item[Travel]
206    Application of a standard 10\% of the total funding to travel costs.
207\item[Expenses for inward billing]
208    Costs justified by inward billing are estimated to about 5\% of the total funding.
209\item[Other working costs] none
210\end{description}
211
212
213%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
214\subsection{Partner 8: \thales}
215
216\begin{description}
217\item[Equipment]
218    In order to validate the design flow,TRT will buy FPGA developpement boards. The cost
219    for these FPGA boards is estimated to 10 k\euro (6\% of the total ANR funding).
220\item[Personnel costs]
221    The effort to adapt SPEAR DE to generate the input files to COACH framework is
222    estimated to 13 \hommemois.
223    The effort to describe and develop the application is estimated to 14 \hommemois.
224    Finally we need one \hommemois for the partiticipation to the global specification in task 2.
225    This is sumarized in the table below:
226    \begin{center}\input{table_thales_full.tex}\end{center}
227\item[Subcontracting]
228    No subcontracting costs.
229\item[Travel]
230    The travel costs are associated to meeting, plenaries as well as participation to
231    conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 10 k\euro. The travel costs are estimated to
232    5\% of the total requested ANR funding.
233\item[Expenses for inward billing] none
234\item[Other working costs] none
235\end{description}
236
237%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
238%
239\begin{landscape}
240\begin{figure}
241\begin{small}
242\settowidth\desclen{XILINX RTL optimisation (5)}
243\def\resstablestyletitle#1{\parbox{\desclen}{\textit{#1}}}
244\begin{minipage}[b]{.47\linewidth}\center
245\input{table_inria_cairn_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex}\\  \irisa  \vspace{2.5ex}\\
246\input{table_mds_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex}\\       \mds \\
247\end{minipage}\hfill\begin{minipage}[b]{.47\linewidth}\center
248\input{table_tima_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex} \\ \tima
249\end{minipage}
250\end{small}
251\caption{\label{table-livrables-1} Man power in \hommemois for the deliverables (1)}
252\end{figure}
253%
254\begin{figure}
255\begin{small}
256\settowidth\desclen{XILINX RTL optimisation (5)}
257\def\resstablestyletitle#1{\parbox{\desclen}{\textit{#1}}}
258\begin{minipage}[b]{.47\linewidth}\center
259\input{table_ubs_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex}\\     \ubs    \vspace{2.5ex}\\
260%\input{table_thales_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex}\\  \thales \\
261\end{minipage}\hfill\begin{minipage}[b]{.47\linewidth}\center
262\input{table_upmc_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex} \\   \upmc
263\end{minipage}
264\end{small}
265\caption{\label{table-livrables-2} Man power in \hommemois for the deliverables (2)}
266\end{figure}
267\end{landscape}
Note: See TracBrowser for help on using the repository browser.