source: anr/section-ressources.tex @ 336

Last change on this file since 336 was 335, checked in by coach, 14 years ago

Mise à jour INRIA Rennes - 28 janv

  • Property svn:eol-style set to native
  • Property svn:keywords set to Revision HeadURL Id Date
File size: 13.9 KB
RevLine 
[289]1\anrdoc{On présentera ici la justification scientifique et technique des moyens
2demandés dans le document de soumission A par chaque partenaire et
3synthétisés à l'échelle du projet dans la fiche «Tableaux récapitulatifs»
4du document de soumission A.\\
5Chaque partenaire justifiera les moyens qu'il demande en distinguant les
6différents postes de dépenses.\\
7Pour chaque partenaire on precisera:
8\begin{itemize}
9\item Equipment: 1) Préciser la nature des équipements* et justifier le
10    choix des équipements. 2) Si nécessaire, préciser la part de financement
11    demandé sur le projet et si les achats envisagés doivent être complétés
12    par d'autres sources de financement. Si tel est le cas, indiquer le
13    montant et l'origine de ces financements complémentaires.\\
14    * Attention: Un devis sera demandé si le projet est retenu pour
15    financement.
16\item Personnel costs
17    1) Le personnel non permanent (thÚses, post- doctorants,CDD...)
18    financé sur le projet devra être justifié.
19    2) Fournir  les profils des postes à pourvoir pour les personnels à
20    recruter (1/2 page maximum par type de poste)
21    3) Pour les thÚses, préciser si des demandes de bourse de thÚse sont
22    prévues ou en cours, en préciser la nature et la part de financement
23    imputable au projet.
24\item Subcontracting. Préciser: 1) la nature des prestations
25    2) le type de prestataire.
26\item Travel.  Préciser: 1) les missions liées aux travaux d'acquisition
27    sur le terrain (campagnes de mesures),
28    2) les missions relevant de colloques, congrÚs.
29\item Costs justified by internal procedures of invoicing. Préciser la nature
30      des prestations.
31\item Other expense. Toute dépense significative relevant de ce poste
32      devra être justifiée.
33\end{itemize}}
34
35\def\resstablestyletitle#1{\begin{small}{\textit{#1}}\end{small}}
36
37%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
[335]38\subsection{Partner 1: \inria}
[289]39
40\begin{description}
41\item [Equipment]
42  No specific equipment acquisition.
43\item [Personnel costs] The faculty members involved in the project
44  are François Charot (INRIA researcher), Steven Derrien (associate
45  professor), Christophe Wolinski (professor) and Charles Wagner
46  (research engineer). The non-permanent personal required is a PhD
47  student that will mainly work on ASIP generation. We are looking for
48  a profile with strong informatic skills and good knowledge in
49  computer architecture.
50  \parlf
51  The table below summarizes the manpower in \hommemois by tasks for both permanent and
52  non-permanent personnels. The detail by deliverables is given in
53  figure~\ref{table-livrables-1}.
54  The non-permanent personnels costs represent {48\%} of the personnal
55  costs. The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 100\% of
56  the total ANR requested funding.
57    \begin{center}\input{table_inria_cairn_short.tex}\end{center}
58\item [Subcontracting]
59  No subcontracting costs.
60\item [Travel]
61  The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as participation to
62  conferences. The travel costs are estimated to {7,5\%} of the total
63  requested ANR funding.
64\item [Expenses for inward billing]
65  The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% of the total
66  requested ANR funding.
67\end{description}
68
69
70\subsection{Partner 2: \lip}
71
72\begin{description}
73\item [Equipment]
74  No specific equipment acquisition. The costs for depreciation of
75  workstations is evaluated to 4\% of the total requested ANR funding.
76\item [Personnel costs]
[330]77  The faculty members involved in the project are Christophe Alias
78  (INRIA researcher) and Paul Feautrier (emeritus professor at
79  ENS-Lyon). The non-permanent personel required is a post-doc that
80  will work on FIFO construction, then on extensions of process
81  construction and memory optimization to non-polyhedral loops.  We
82  are looking for a candidate with both theoretical and practical
83  skills, that will be able to get a sufficient understanding of the
84  polyhedral techniques to produce a working implementation.  \parlf
85  The table below summarizes the \hommemois by deliverables and tasks
86  for both permanent and non-permanent personnels.  The non-permanent
[332]87  personnels costs represents \mustbecompleted{??}\% of the personnal costs. The
[330]88  requested funding for non permanent personnels is 100\% of the
89  total ANR requested
[332]90  funding.  \begin{center}\input{table_inria_compsys_full.tex}\end{center}
[289]91\item [Subcontracting]
92  No subcontracting costs.
93\item [Travel]
94  The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as
95  participation to conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 20\%
96  of the total requested ANR funding.
97\item [Expenses for inward billing]
98  The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated
99  to 4\% of the total requested ANR funding.
100\end{description}
101
102%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
103\subsection{Partner 3: \tima}
104
105\begin{description}
106\item [Equipment]
107  No specific equipment acquisition.
108\item [Personnel costs]
[325]109  The permanent personnels involved in the project are professor and associate professor
[289]110  (Fr\'ed\'eric P\'etrot and Olivier Muller).
111  The non permanent personnels are Phd students and post-doc researchers.
112  Related costs are estimated in \hommemois.
[325]113  One phd student (Adrien Prost-Boucle), funded by the French ministry of research, will
[289]114  be working on the project.
[325]115  One 100\% funded phd student will be hired in September 2011. A post-doc researcher will
116  be hired at the end of 2012 for one year.
[289]117  The PhD student will mainly work on the evolution of UGH HLS tool. Thus, we are looking
118  for a profile with strong informatic skills and good knowledge in computer architecture.
[325]119  The post-doc will mainly work on HPC. The required profile
[289]120  will be more oriented on computer architecture and advanced digital design.
121  \parlf
[325]122  The table below summarizes the man power in \hommemois by tasks for both permanent and
[289]123  non-permanent personnels. The detail by deliverables is given in
124  figure~\ref{table-livrables-1}.
[325]125  The effort of permanent personnels represents 50\% of the total effort.
126  The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 86\% of the total ANR requested
[289]127  funding.
128    \begin{center}\input{table_tima_short.tex}\end{center}
129\item [Subcontracting]
130  No subcontracting costs.
131\item [Travel]
132  The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as participation to
[325]133  conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 10\% of the total requested ANR funding.
[289]134\item [Expenses for inward billing]
135  The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% of the total
136  requested ANR funding.
137\end{description}
138
139%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
140\subsection{Partner 4: \ubs}
141
142\begin {description}
143\item [Equipment]
144  In order to validate the design flow project, the Lab-STICC laboratory will buy FPGA
145  developpement boards.  The cost for these FPGA boards is estimated to 3\% of the total
146  ANR funding.
147\item [Personnel costs]
148  The faculty members involved in the project are associate professors (Philippe COUSSY,
149  Cyrille CHAVET) or research engineers (Dominique HELLER). All non-permanent personnel
150  costs are estimated in \hommemois for senior researchers (post-doc or research
151  engineers).
152  \parlf
153  The table below sumarizes the man power in \hommemois by tasks for both permanent and
154  non-permanent personnels. The detail by deliverables is given in
155  figure~\ref{table-livrables-2}.
156  The non-permanent personnels costs represent 50\% of the personnal costs.
157  The requested funding for non permanent personnels is about 83\% of the total ANR
158  requested funding.
159    \begin{center}\input{table_ubs_short.tex}\end{center}
160\item [Subcontracting]
161  No subcontracting costs.
162\item [Travel]
163  The travel costs are associated to management and meeting as well as participation to
164  conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 10\% of the total requested ANR funding.
165\item [Expenses for inward billing]
166  The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% of the total
167  requested ANR funding.
168\end {description}
169
170
171%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
172\subsection{Partner 5: \upmc}
173
174\begin{description}
175\item[Equipment]
176    No specific equipment acquisition is required for this project.
177    The costs for depreciation of workstations and pre-existing FPGA boards are evaluated
178    to 7\% of the total requested ANR funding.
179\item[Personnel costs]
180    The permanent personnels involved in the project are professors or assistant
181    processors (Alain Greiner and Ivan Aug\'e).
182    All non permanent personnel costs are estimated in \hommemois for senior researchers
183    (post-doc or research engineers).
184    The table below sumarizes the man power by tasks in \hommemois for both permanent  and
185    non-permanent personnels.
186    The detail by deliverables is given in figure~\ref{table-livrables-2}.
[304]187    The non-permanent personnels costs (24 \hommemois) represent 46\% of the personnal costs.
[289]188    The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 79\% of the total ANR
189    requested funding.
190    \begin{center}\input{table_upmc_short.tex}\end{center}
191\item[Subcontracting]
192    No subcontracting costs.
193\item[Travel]
194    The travel costs are associated to management and coordination meeting as
195    well as participation to conferences. The travel costs are estimated
196    to 10\% of the total requested ANR funding.
197\item[Expenses for inward billing]
198    The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\%
199    of the total requested ANR funding.
200\end{description}
201
202%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
[290]203\subsection{Partner 6: \mdslong}
[289]204
205\begin{description}
206\item[Equipment]
207  No specific equipment acquisition is required for this project.
208\item[Personnel costs]
[315]209  \mds employees involved in the project are permanent managers, engineers and doctors.
[289]210  The man power detail in \hommemois by deliverables is given in
211  figure~\ref{table-livrables-1} and a sumary by task in the following table.
212  \begin{center}\input{table_mds_short.tex}\end{center}
213\item[Subcontracting]
214  No subcontracting costs.
215\item[Travel]
216  The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as participation to
217  conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 2\% of the total requested ANR funding.
218\item[Expenses for inward billing] none
219\item[Other working costs] none
220\end{description}
221
[315]222
[289]223%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
224\subsection{Partner 7: \bull}
225
226\begin{description}
227\item[Equipment]
228    Acquisition of a FPGA development board will represent the main equipment cost for
229    Bull in COACH. It is estimated at about 5\% (tbc) of the total funding.
230\item[Personnel costs]
231    A permanent engineer will be assigned full time to the project for a duration of 20
232    months as shown in the table below that gives the man power in \hommemois:
233    \begin{center}\input{table_bull_full.tex}\end{center}
234\item[Subcontracting]
235    No subcontracting costs.
236\item[Travel]
237    Application of a standard 10\% of the total funding to travel costs.
238\item[Expenses for inward billing]
239    Costs justified by inward billing are estimated to about 5\% of the total funding.
240\item[Other working costs] none
241\end{description}
242
243
244%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
245\subsection{Partner 8: \thales}
246
247\begin{description}
248\item[Equipment]
249    In order to validate the design flow,TRT will buy FPGA developpement boards. The cost
250    for these FPGA boards is estimated to 10 k\euro (6\% of the total ANR funding).
251\item[Personnel costs]
252    The effort to adapt SPEAR DE to generate the input files to COACH framework is
253    estimated to 13 \hommemois.
254    The effort to describe and develop the application is estimated to 14 \hommemois.
255    Finally we need one \hommemois for the partiticipation to the global specification in task 2.
256    This is sumarized in the table below:
257    \begin{center}\input{table_thales_full.tex}\end{center}
258\item[Subcontracting]
259    No subcontracting costs.
260\item[Travel]
261    The travel costs are associated to meeting, plenaries as well as participation to
262    conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 10 k\euro. The travel costs are estimated to
263    5\% of the total requested ANR funding.
264\item[Expenses for inward billing] none
265\item[Other working costs] none
266\end{description}
267
268%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
269%
270\begin{landscape}
271\begin{figure}
272\begin{small}
273\settowidth\desclen{XILINX RTL optimisation (5)}
274\def\resstablestyletitle#1{\parbox{\desclen}{\textit{#1}}}
275\begin{minipage}[b]{.47\linewidth}\center
[335]276\input{table_inria_cairn_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex}\\  \inria  \vspace{2.5ex}\\
[289]277\input{table_mds_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex}\\       \mds \\
278\end{minipage}\hfill\begin{minipage}[b]{.47\linewidth}\center
279\input{table_tima_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex} \\ \tima
280\end{minipage}
281\end{small}
282\caption{\label{table-livrables-1} Man power in \hommemois for the deliverables (1)}
283\end{figure}
284%
285\begin{figure}
286\begin{small}
287\settowidth\desclen{XILINX RTL optimisation (5)}
288\def\resstablestyletitle#1{\parbox{\desclen}{\textit{#1}}}
289\begin{minipage}[b]{.47\linewidth}\center
290\input{table_ubs_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex}\\     \ubs    \vspace{2.5ex}\\
291%\input{table_thales_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex}\\  \thales \\
292\end{minipage}\hfill\begin{minipage}[b]{.47\linewidth}\center
293\input{table_upmc_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex} \\   \upmc
294\end{minipage}
295\end{small}
296\caption{\label{table-livrables-2} Man power in \hommemois for the deliverables (2)}
297\end{figure}
298\end{landscape}
[330]299%
[332]300%\begin{landscape}
301%\begin{figure}
302%\begin{small}
303%\settowidth\desclen{XILINX RTL optimisation (5)}
304%\def\resstablestyletitle#1{\parbox{\desclen}{\textit{#1}}}
305%\hfill
306%\begin{minipage}[b]{.47\linewidth}\center
307%\input{table_inria_compsys_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex}\\     \lip    \vspace{2.5ex}\\
308%\end{minipage}\hfill
309%\end{small}
310%\caption{\label{table-livrables-2} Man power in \hommemois for the deliverables (3)}
311%\end{figure}
312%\end{landscape}
Note: See TracBrowser for help on using the repository browser.