| 1 | \anrdoc{On présentera ici la justification scientifique et technique des moyens |
|---|
| 2 | demandés dans le document de soumission A par chaque partenaire et |
|---|
| 3 | synthétisés à l'échelle du projet dans la fiche «Tableaux récapitulatifs» |
|---|
| 4 | du document de soumission A.\\ |
|---|
| 5 | Chaque partenaire justifiera les moyens qu'il demande en distinguant les |
|---|
| 6 | différents postes de dépenses.\\ |
|---|
| 7 | Pour chaque partenaire on precisera: |
|---|
| 8 | \begin{itemize} |
|---|
| 9 | \item Equipment: 1) Préciser la nature des équipements* et justifier le |
|---|
| 10 | choix des équipements. 2) Si nécessaire, préciser la part de financement |
|---|
| 11 | demandé sur le projet et si les achats envisagés doivent être complétés |
|---|
| 12 | par d'autres sources de financement. Si tel est le cas, indiquer le |
|---|
| 13 | montant et l'origine de ces financements complémentaires.\\ |
|---|
| 14 | * Attention: Un devis sera demandé si le projet est retenu pour |
|---|
| 15 | financement. |
|---|
| 16 | \item Personnel costs |
|---|
| 17 | 1) Le personnel non permanent (thÚses, post- doctorants,CDD...) |
|---|
| 18 | financé sur le projet devra être justifié. |
|---|
| 19 | 2) Fournir les profils des postes à pourvoir pour les personnels à |
|---|
| 20 | recruter (1/2 page maximum par type de poste) |
|---|
| 21 | 3) Pour les thÚses, préciser si des demandes de bourse de thÚse sont |
|---|
| 22 | prévues ou en cours, en préciser la nature et la part de financement |
|---|
| 23 | imputable au projet. |
|---|
| 24 | \item Subcontracting. Préciser: 1) la nature des prestations |
|---|
| 25 | 2) le type de prestataire. |
|---|
| 26 | \item Travel. Préciser: 1) les missions liées aux travaux d'acquisition |
|---|
| 27 | sur le terrain (campagnes de mesures), |
|---|
| 28 | 2) les missions relevant de colloques, congrÚs. |
|---|
| 29 | \item Costs justified by internal procedures of invoicing. Préciser la nature |
|---|
| 30 | des prestations. |
|---|
| 31 | \item Other expense. Toute dépense significative relevant de ce poste |
|---|
| 32 | devra être justifiée. |
|---|
| 33 | \end{itemize}} |
|---|
| 34 | |
|---|
| 35 | \def\resstablestyletitle#1{\begin{small}{\textit{#1}}\end{small}} |
|---|
| 36 | |
|---|
| 37 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
|---|
| 38 | \subsection{Partner 1: \irisa} |
|---|
| 39 | |
|---|
| 40 | \begin{description} |
|---|
| 41 | \item [Equipment] |
|---|
| 42 | No specific equipment acquisition. |
|---|
| 43 | \item [Personnel costs] The faculty members involved in the project |
|---|
| 44 | are François Charot (INRIA researcher), Steven Derrien (associate |
|---|
| 45 | professor), Christophe Wolinski (professor) and Charles Wagner |
|---|
| 46 | (research engineer). The non-permanent personal required is a PhD |
|---|
| 47 | student that will mainly work on ASIP generation. We are looking for |
|---|
| 48 | a profile with strong informatic skills and good knowledge in |
|---|
| 49 | computer architecture. |
|---|
| 50 | \parlf |
|---|
| 51 | The table below summarizes the manpower in \hommemois by tasks for both permanent and |
|---|
| 52 | non-permanent personnels. The detail by deliverables is given in |
|---|
| 53 | figure~\ref{table-livrables-1}. |
|---|
| 54 | The non-permanent personnels costs represent {48\%} of the personnal |
|---|
| 55 | costs. The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 100\% of |
|---|
| 56 | the total ANR requested funding. |
|---|
| 57 | \begin{center}\input{table_inria_cairn_short.tex}\end{center} |
|---|
| 58 | \item [Subcontracting] |
|---|
| 59 | No subcontracting costs. |
|---|
| 60 | \item [Travel] |
|---|
| 61 | The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as participation to |
|---|
| 62 | conferences. The travel costs are estimated to {7,5\%} of the total |
|---|
| 63 | requested ANR funding. |
|---|
| 64 | \item [Expenses for inward billing] |
|---|
| 65 | The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% of the total |
|---|
| 66 | requested ANR funding. |
|---|
| 67 | \end{description} |
|---|
| 68 | |
|---|
| 69 | |
|---|
| 70 | \subsection{Partner 2: \lip} |
|---|
| 71 | |
|---|
| 72 | \begin{description} |
|---|
| 73 | \item [Equipment] |
|---|
| 74 | No specific equipment acquisition. The costs for depreciation of |
|---|
| 75 | workstations is evaluated to 4\% of the total requested ANR funding. |
|---|
| 76 | \item [Personnel costs] |
|---|
| 77 | The faculty members involved in the project are an emeritus |
|---|
| 78 | professor at ENS Lyon (Paul Feautrier) and a research associate |
|---|
| 79 | (CR2) at INRIA Rh\^one-Alpes (Christophe Alias). The non-permanent |
|---|
| 80 | personel required is a PhD student that will work on network process |
|---|
| 81 | generation from polyhedral loops, then on extensions to |
|---|
| 82 | non-polyhedral loops. We are looking for a student with both |
|---|
| 83 | theoretical and practical skills, that will be able to get a |
|---|
| 84 | sufficient understanding of the polyhedral techniques and to produce |
|---|
| 85 | a working implementation. |
|---|
| 86 | \parlf |
|---|
| 87 | The table below summarizes the \hommemois by |
|---|
| 88 | deliverables and tasks for both permanent and non-permanent |
|---|
| 89 | personnels. The non-permanent personnels costs represent 26\% of |
|---|
| 90 | the personnal costs. The requested funding for non |
|---|
| 91 | permanent personnels is 100\% of the total ANR requested funding. |
|---|
| 92 | \begin{center}\input{table_inria_compsys_full.tex}\end{center} |
|---|
| 93 | \item [Subcontracting] |
|---|
| 94 | No subcontracting costs. |
|---|
| 95 | \item [Travel] |
|---|
| 96 | The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as |
|---|
| 97 | participation to conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 20\% |
|---|
| 98 | of the total requested ANR funding. |
|---|
| 99 | \item [Expenses for inward billing] |
|---|
| 100 | The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated |
|---|
| 101 | to 4\% of the total requested ANR funding. |
|---|
| 102 | \end{description} |
|---|
| 103 | |
|---|
| 104 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
|---|
| 105 | \subsection{Partner 3: \tima} |
|---|
| 106 | |
|---|
| 107 | \begin{description} |
|---|
| 108 | \item [Equipment] |
|---|
| 109 | No specific equipment acquisition. |
|---|
| 110 | \item [Personnel costs] |
|---|
| 111 | The permanent personnels involved in the project are professor and associate professor |
|---|
| 112 | (Fr\'ed\'eric P\'etrot and Olivier Muller). |
|---|
| 113 | The non permanent personnels are Phd students and post-doc researchers. |
|---|
| 114 | Related costs are estimated in \hommemois. |
|---|
| 115 | One phd student (Adrien Prost-Boucle), funded by the French ministry of research, will |
|---|
| 116 | be working on the project. |
|---|
| 117 | One 100\% funded phd student will be hired in September 2011. A post-doc researcher will |
|---|
| 118 | be hired at the end of 2012 for one year. |
|---|
| 119 | The PhD student will mainly work on the evolution of UGH HLS tool. Thus, we are looking |
|---|
| 120 | for a profile with strong informatic skills and good knowledge in computer architecture. |
|---|
| 121 | The post-doc will mainly work on HPC. The required profile |
|---|
| 122 | will be more oriented on computer architecture and advanced digital design. |
|---|
| 123 | \parlf |
|---|
| 124 | The table below summarizes the man power in \hommemois by tasks for both permanent and |
|---|
| 125 | non-permanent personnels. The detail by deliverables is given in |
|---|
| 126 | figure~\ref{table-livrables-1}. |
|---|
| 127 | The effort of permanent personnels represents 50\% of the total effort. |
|---|
| 128 | The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 86\% of the total ANR requested |
|---|
| 129 | funding. |
|---|
| 130 | \begin{center}\input{table_tima_short.tex}\end{center} |
|---|
| 131 | \item [Subcontracting] |
|---|
| 132 | No subcontracting costs. |
|---|
| 133 | \item [Travel] |
|---|
| 134 | The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as participation to |
|---|
| 135 | conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 10\% of the total requested ANR funding. |
|---|
| 136 | \item [Expenses for inward billing] |
|---|
| 137 | The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% of the total |
|---|
| 138 | requested ANR funding. |
|---|
| 139 | \end{description} |
|---|
| 140 | |
|---|
| 141 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
|---|
| 142 | \subsection{Partner 4: \ubs} |
|---|
| 143 | |
|---|
| 144 | \begin {description} |
|---|
| 145 | \item [Equipment] |
|---|
| 146 | In order to validate the design flow project, the Lab-STICC laboratory will buy FPGA |
|---|
| 147 | developpement boards. The cost for these FPGA boards is estimated to 3\% of the total |
|---|
| 148 | ANR funding. |
|---|
| 149 | \item [Personnel costs] |
|---|
| 150 | The faculty members involved in the project are associate professors (Philippe COUSSY, |
|---|
| 151 | Cyrille CHAVET) or research engineers (Dominique HELLER). All non-permanent personnel |
|---|
| 152 | costs are estimated in \hommemois for senior researchers (post-doc or research |
|---|
| 153 | engineers). |
|---|
| 154 | \parlf |
|---|
| 155 | The table below sumarizes the man power in \hommemois by tasks for both permanent and |
|---|
| 156 | non-permanent personnels. The detail by deliverables is given in |
|---|
| 157 | figure~\ref{table-livrables-2}. |
|---|
| 158 | The non-permanent personnels costs represent 50\% of the personnal costs. |
|---|
| 159 | The requested funding for non permanent personnels is about 83\% of the total ANR |
|---|
| 160 | requested funding. |
|---|
| 161 | \begin{center}\input{table_ubs_short.tex}\end{center} |
|---|
| 162 | \item [Subcontracting] |
|---|
| 163 | No subcontracting costs. |
|---|
| 164 | \item [Travel] |
|---|
| 165 | The travel costs are associated to management and meeting as well as participation to |
|---|
| 166 | conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 10\% of the total requested ANR funding. |
|---|
| 167 | \item [Expenses for inward billing] |
|---|
| 168 | The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% of the total |
|---|
| 169 | requested ANR funding. |
|---|
| 170 | \end {description} |
|---|
| 171 | |
|---|
| 172 | |
|---|
| 173 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
|---|
| 174 | \subsection{Partner 5: \upmc} |
|---|
| 175 | |
|---|
| 176 | \begin{description} |
|---|
| 177 | \item[Equipment] |
|---|
| 178 | No specific equipment acquisition is required for this project. |
|---|
| 179 | The costs for depreciation of workstations and pre-existing FPGA boards are evaluated |
|---|
| 180 | to 7\% of the total requested ANR funding. |
|---|
| 181 | \item[Personnel costs] |
|---|
| 182 | The permanent personnels involved in the project are professors or assistant |
|---|
| 183 | processors (Alain Greiner and Ivan Aug\'e). |
|---|
| 184 | All non permanent personnel costs are estimated in \hommemois for senior researchers |
|---|
| 185 | (post-doc or research engineers). |
|---|
| 186 | The table below sumarizes the man power by tasks in \hommemois for both permanent and |
|---|
| 187 | non-permanent personnels. |
|---|
| 188 | The detail by deliverables is given in figure~\ref{table-livrables-2}. |
|---|
| 189 | The non-permanent personnels costs (24 \hommemois) represent 46\% of the personnal costs. |
|---|
| 190 | The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 79\% of the total ANR |
|---|
| 191 | requested funding. |
|---|
| 192 | \begin{center}\input{table_upmc_short.tex}\end{center} |
|---|
| 193 | \item[Subcontracting] |
|---|
| 194 | No subcontracting costs. |
|---|
| 195 | \item[Travel] |
|---|
| 196 | The travel costs are associated to management and coordination meeting as |
|---|
| 197 | well as participation to conferences. The travel costs are estimated |
|---|
| 198 | to 10\% of the total requested ANR funding. |
|---|
| 199 | \item[Expenses for inward billing] |
|---|
| 200 | The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% |
|---|
| 201 | of the total requested ANR funding. |
|---|
| 202 | \end{description} |
|---|
| 203 | |
|---|
| 204 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
|---|
| 205 | \subsection{Partner 6: \mdslong} |
|---|
| 206 | |
|---|
| 207 | \begin{description} |
|---|
| 208 | \item[Equipment] |
|---|
| 209 | No specific equipment acquisition is required for this project. |
|---|
| 210 | \item[Personnel costs] |
|---|
| 211 | \mds employees involved in the project are permanent managers, engineers and doctors. |
|---|
| 212 | The man power detail in \hommemois by deliverables is given in |
|---|
| 213 | figure~\ref{table-livrables-1} and a sumary by task in the following table. |
|---|
| 214 | \begin{center}\input{table_mds_short.tex}\end{center} |
|---|
| 215 | \item[Subcontracting] |
|---|
| 216 | No subcontracting costs. |
|---|
| 217 | \item[Travel] |
|---|
| 218 | The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as participation to |
|---|
| 219 | conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 2\% of the total requested ANR funding. |
|---|
| 220 | \item[Expenses for inward billing] none |
|---|
| 221 | \item[Other working costs] none |
|---|
| 222 | \end{description} |
|---|
| 223 | |
|---|
| 224 | |
|---|
| 225 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
|---|
| 226 | \subsection{Partner 7: \bull} |
|---|
| 227 | |
|---|
| 228 | \begin{description} |
|---|
| 229 | \item[Equipment] |
|---|
| 230 | Acquisition of a FPGA development board will represent the main equipment cost for |
|---|
| 231 | Bull in COACH. It is estimated at about 5\% (tbc) of the total funding. |
|---|
| 232 | \item[Personnel costs] |
|---|
| 233 | A permanent engineer will be assigned full time to the project for a duration of 20 |
|---|
| 234 | months as shown in the table below that gives the man power in \hommemois: |
|---|
| 235 | \begin{center}\input{table_bull_full.tex}\end{center} |
|---|
| 236 | \item[Subcontracting] |
|---|
| 237 | No subcontracting costs. |
|---|
| 238 | \item[Travel] |
|---|
| 239 | Application of a standard 10\% of the total funding to travel costs. |
|---|
| 240 | \item[Expenses for inward billing] |
|---|
| 241 | Costs justified by inward billing are estimated to about 5\% of the total funding. |
|---|
| 242 | \item[Other working costs] none |
|---|
| 243 | \end{description} |
|---|
| 244 | |
|---|
| 245 | |
|---|
| 246 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
|---|
| 247 | \subsection{Partner 8: \thales} |
|---|
| 248 | |
|---|
| 249 | \begin{description} |
|---|
| 250 | \item[Equipment] |
|---|
| 251 | In order to validate the design flow,TRT will buy FPGA developpement boards. The cost |
|---|
| 252 | for these FPGA boards is estimated to 10 k\euro (6\% of the total ANR funding). |
|---|
| 253 | \item[Personnel costs] |
|---|
| 254 | The effort to adapt SPEAR DE to generate the input files to COACH framework is |
|---|
| 255 | estimated to 13 \hommemois. |
|---|
| 256 | The effort to describe and develop the application is estimated to 14 \hommemois. |
|---|
| 257 | Finally we need one \hommemois for the partiticipation to the global specification in task 2. |
|---|
| 258 | This is sumarized in the table below: |
|---|
| 259 | \begin{center}\input{table_thales_full.tex}\end{center} |
|---|
| 260 | \item[Subcontracting] |
|---|
| 261 | No subcontracting costs. |
|---|
| 262 | \item[Travel] |
|---|
| 263 | The travel costs are associated to meeting, plenaries as well as participation to |
|---|
| 264 | conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 10 k\euro. The travel costs are estimated to |
|---|
| 265 | 5\% of the total requested ANR funding. |
|---|
| 266 | \item[Expenses for inward billing] none |
|---|
| 267 | \item[Other working costs] none |
|---|
| 268 | \end{description} |
|---|
| 269 | |
|---|
| 270 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
|---|
| 271 | % |
|---|
| 272 | \begin{landscape} |
|---|
| 273 | \begin{figure} |
|---|
| 274 | \begin{small} |
|---|
| 275 | \settowidth\desclen{XILINX RTL optimisation (5)} |
|---|
| 276 | \def\resstablestyletitle#1{\parbox{\desclen}{\textit{#1}}} |
|---|
| 277 | \begin{minipage}[b]{.47\linewidth}\center |
|---|
| 278 | \input{table_inria_cairn_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex}\\ \irisa \vspace{2.5ex}\\ |
|---|
| 279 | \input{table_mds_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex}\\ \mds \\ |
|---|
| 280 | \end{minipage}\hfill\begin{minipage}[b]{.47\linewidth}\center |
|---|
| 281 | \input{table_tima_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex} \\ \tima |
|---|
| 282 | \end{minipage} |
|---|
| 283 | \end{small} |
|---|
| 284 | \caption{\label{table-livrables-1} Man power in \hommemois for the deliverables (1)} |
|---|
| 285 | \end{figure} |
|---|
| 286 | % |
|---|
| 287 | \begin{figure} |
|---|
| 288 | \begin{small} |
|---|
| 289 | \settowidth\desclen{XILINX RTL optimisation (5)} |
|---|
| 290 | \def\resstablestyletitle#1{\parbox{\desclen}{\textit{#1}}} |
|---|
| 291 | \begin{minipage}[b]{.47\linewidth}\center |
|---|
| 292 | \input{table_ubs_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex}\\ \ubs \vspace{2.5ex}\\ |
|---|
| 293 | %\input{table_thales_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex}\\ \thales \\ |
|---|
| 294 | \end{minipage}\hfill\begin{minipage}[b]{.47\linewidth}\center |
|---|
| 295 | \input{table_upmc_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex} \\ \upmc |
|---|
| 296 | \end{minipage} |
|---|
| 297 | \end{small} |
|---|
| 298 | \caption{\label{table-livrables-2} Man power in \hommemois for the deliverables (2)} |
|---|
| 299 | \end{figure} |
|---|
| 300 | \end{landscape} |
|---|