- Timestamp:
- Feb 15, 2010, 10:53:46 AM (15 years ago)
- File:
-
- 1 edited
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
-
anr/section-7.tex
r160 r161 66 66 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 67 67 \subsection{Partner 3: \tima} 68 \begin{figure}\leavevmode\center 69 \input{table_tima_full.tex} 70 \caption{\label{ress-detail-tima}Man power in $mm$ for the deliverables of \tima.} 71 \end{figure} 72 \begin{description} 73 \item [Equipment] 74 No specific equipment acquisition. 68 69 \begin{description} 70 \item [Equipment] 71 No specific equipment acquisition. 75 72 \item [Personnel costs] 76 The permanent personnels involved in the project are professor and 77 assistant professor (Fr\'ed\'eric P\'etrot and Olivier Muller). 78 The non permanent personnels are Phd students and post-doc researchers. 79 Related costs are estimated in men per months. 80 One phd student (Adrien Prost-Boucle), funded by the 81 french ministry of research, 82 will be working on the project. 83 One 100\% funded phd student will be hired in september 2010. A post-doc researcher 84 will be hired at the end of 2011 for one year and an half. 85 The PhD student will mainly work on the evolution of UGH HLS tool. Thus, we 86 are looking for a profile with strong informatic skills and good knowledge in 87 computer architecture. 88 The post-doc will mainly work on dynamic reconfiguration and HPC. The required 89 profile will be more oriented on computer architecture and advanced digital design. 90 91 The table below sumarizes the man power by task for both permanent and non-permanent 92 personnels. The detail by deliverables is given in figure~\ref{ress-detail-tima}. 93 The requested funding for personnels represent 50\% of the total personnal costs. 94 The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 85\% of the total ANR 95 requested funding. 96 \begin{center}\input{table_tima_short.tex}\end{center} 97 \item [Subcontracting] 98 No subcontracting costs. 99 \item [Travel] 100 The travel costs are associated to project meeting as 101 well as participation to conferences. The travel costs are estimated 102 to 11\% of the total requested ANR funding. 103 \item [Expenses for inward billing] 104 The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% 105 of the total requested ANR funding.\\ 73 The permanent personnels involved in the project are professor and assistant professor 74 (Fr\'ed\'eric P\'etrot and Olivier Muller). 75 The non permanent personnels are Phd students and post-doc researchers. 76 Related costs are estimated in men per months. 77 One phd student (Adrien Prost-Boucle), funded by the french ministry of research, will 78 be working on the project. 79 One 100\% funded phd student will be hired in september 2010. A post-doc researcher will 80 be hired at the end of 2011 for one year and an half. 81 The PhD student will mainly work on the evolution of UGH HLS tool. Thus, we are looking 82 for a profile with strong informatic skills and good knowledge in computer architecture. 83 The post-doc will mainly work on dynamic reconfiguration and HPC. The required profile 84 will be more oriented on computer architecture and advanced digital design. 85 \parlf 86 The table below sumarizes the man power in man-months by tasks for both permanent and 87 non-permanent personnels. The detail by deliverables is given in 88 figure~\ref{table-livrables-1}. 89 The requested funding for personnels represent 50\% of the total personnal costs. 90 The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 85\% of the total ANR requested 91 funding. 92 \begin{center}\input{table_tima_short.tex}\end{center} 93 \item [Subcontracting] 94 No subcontracting costs. 95 \item [Travel] 96 The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as participation to 97 conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 11\% of the total requested ANR funding. 98 \item [Expenses for inward billing] 99 The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% of the total 100 requested ANR funding. 106 101 \end{description} 107 102 108 103 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 109 104 \subsection{Partner 4: \ubs} 110 \begin{figure}\leavevmode\center111 \input{table_ubs_full.tex}112 \caption{\label{ress-detail-ubs}Man power in $mm$ for the deliverables of \ubs.}113 \end{figure}114 105 115 106 \begin {description} 116 107 \item [Equipment] 117 In order to validate the design flow project, the LabSTICC laboratory will buy FPGA developpement boards. 118 The cost for these FPGA boards is estimated to 3\% of the total ANR funding. 108 In order to validate the design flow project, the LabSTICC laboratory will buy FPGA 109 developpement boards. The cost for these FPGA boards is estimated to 3\% of the total 110 ANR funding. 119 111 \item [Personnel costs] 120 The faculty members involved in the project are 121 associate professors (Philippe COUSSY, Cyrille CHAVET) or research engineers (Dominique HELLER). 122 All non-permanent personnel costs are estimated in men*months 123 for senior researchers (post-doc or researchengineers).124 125 The table below sumarizes the man power by task for both permanent and non-permanent 126 personnels. The detail by deliverables is given in figure~\ref {ress-detail-ubs}. 127 The non-permanent personnels costs represent 50\% of the personnal costs.128 The requested funding for non permanent personnels is about 83\% of the total ANR 129 requested funding. 130 \begin{center}\input{table_ubs_short.tex}\end{center} 131 \item [Subcontracting] 132 No subcontracting costs. 133 \item [Travel] 134 The travel costs are associated to management and meeting as 135 well as participation to conferences. The travel costs are estimated 136 to 10\% of the total requested ANR funding.137 \item [Expenses for inward billing] 138 The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% 139 of the totalrequested ANR funding.112 The faculty members involved in the project are associate professors (Philippe COUSSY, 113 Cyrille CHAVET) or research engineers (Dominique HELLER). All non-permanent personnel 114 costs are estimated in men*months for senior researchers (post-doc or research 115 engineers). 116 \parlf 117 The table below sumarizes the man power in man-months by tasks for both permanent and 118 non-permanent personnels. The detail by deliverables is given in 119 figure~\ref{table-livrables-2}. 120 The non-permanent personnels costs represent 50\% of the personnal costs. 121 The requested funding for non permanent personnels is about 83\% of the total ANR 122 requested funding. 123 \begin{center}\input{table_ubs_short.tex}\end{center} 124 \item [Subcontracting] 125 No subcontracting costs. 126 \item [Travel] 127 The travel costs are associated to management and meeting as well as participation to 128 conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 10\% of the total requested ANR funding. 129 \item [Expenses for inward billing] 130 The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% of the total 131 requested ANR funding. 140 132 \end {description} 141 133 … … 283 275 \end{minipage} 284 276 \end{small} 285 \caption{\label{table-livrables-1} Man power in $mm$ for the delivrables (1)}277 \caption{\label{table-livrables-1} Man power in man-months for the deliverables (1)} 286 278 \end{figure} 287 279 % … … 297 289 \end{minipage} 298 290 \end{small} 299 \caption{\label{table-livrables-2} Man power in $mm$ for the delivrables (2)}291 \caption{\label{table-livrables-2} Man power in man-months for the deliverables (2)} 300 292 \end{figure} 301 293 \end{landscape}
Note: See TracChangeset
for help on using the changeset viewer.