[123] | 1 | \def\resstablestyletitle#1{\begin{small}{\textit{#1}}\end{small}} |
---|
[53] | 2 | |
---|
| 3 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
---|
[121] | 4 | \subsection{Partner 1: \irisa} |
---|
[53] | 5 | |
---|
[121] | 6 | \begin{description} |
---|
| 7 | \item [Equipment] |
---|
[159] | 8 | No specific equipment acquisition. |
---|
[121] | 9 | \item [Personnel costs] The faculty members involved in the project |
---|
| 10 | are François Charot (INRIA researcher) Steven Derrien (associate |
---|
| 11 | professor) and Charles Wagner (research engineer). The non-permanent |
---|
| 12 | personal required is a PhD student that will mainly work on ASIP |
---|
[131] | 13 | generation. We are looking for a profile with strong informatic skills |
---|
[121] | 14 | and good knowledge in computer architecture. |
---|
[159] | 15 | \parlf |
---|
[164] | 16 | The table below summarizes the manpower in \hommemois by tasks for both permanent and |
---|
[159] | 17 | non-permanent personnels. The detail by deliverables is given in |
---|
| 18 | figure~\ref{table-livrables-1}. |
---|
| 19 | The non-permanent personnels costs represent \mustbecompleted{??\%} of the personnal |
---|
| 20 | costs. The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 100\% of |
---|
| 21 | the total ANR requested funding. |
---|
[121] | 22 | \begin{center}\input{table_inria_cairn_short.tex}\end{center} |
---|
| 23 | \item [Subcontracting] |
---|
[159] | 24 | No subcontracting costs. |
---|
[121] | 25 | \item [Travel] |
---|
[159] | 26 | The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as participation to |
---|
| 27 | conferences. The travel costs are estimated to \mustbecompleted{??\%} of the total |
---|
| 28 | requested ANR funding. |
---|
[121] | 29 | \item [Expenses for inward billing] |
---|
[159] | 30 | The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% of the total |
---|
| 31 | requested ANR funding. |
---|
[121] | 32 | \end{description} |
---|
| 33 | |
---|
| 34 | |
---|
| 35 | \subsection{Partner 2: \lip} |
---|
| 36 | |
---|
[87] | 37 | \begin{description} |
---|
| 38 | \item [Equipment] |
---|
[159] | 39 | No specific equipment acquisition. |
---|
[87] | 40 | \item [Personnel costs] |
---|
[160] | 41 | The faculty members involved in the project are an emeritus professor at ENS Lyon (Paul |
---|
| 42 | Feautrier) and a research associate (CR2) at INRIA Rh\^one-Alpes (Christophe Alias). |
---|
[159] | 43 | The non-permanent personal required is a PhD student that will work on network process |
---|
| 44 | generation from polyhedral loops, then on extensions to non-polyhedral loops. |
---|
| 45 | We are looking for a student with both theoretical and practical skills, that will be |
---|
| 46 | able to get a sufficient understanding of the polyhedral techniques and to produce a |
---|
| 47 | working implementation. |
---|
| 48 | \parlf |
---|
[162] | 49 | The table below summarizes the man power in \hommemois by deliverables and tasks for |
---|
[160] | 50 | both permanent and non-permanent personnels. |
---|
[159] | 51 | The non-permanent personnels costs represent \mustbecompleted{??\%} of the personnal |
---|
| 52 | costs. The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 100\% of the total ANR |
---|
| 53 | requested funding. |
---|
[152] | 54 | \begin{center}\input{table_inria_compsys_full.tex}\end{center} |
---|
[87] | 55 | \item [Subcontracting] |
---|
[159] | 56 | No subcontracting costs. |
---|
[87] | 57 | \item [Travel] |
---|
[159] | 58 | The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as participation to |
---|
| 59 | conferences. The travel costs are estimated to \mustbecompleted{??\%} of the total |
---|
| 60 | requested ANR funding. |
---|
[87] | 61 | \item [Expenses for inward billing] |
---|
[159] | 62 | The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% of the total |
---|
| 63 | requested ANR funding. |
---|
[87] | 64 | \end{description} |
---|
| 65 | |
---|
[53] | 66 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
---|
[121] | 67 | \subsection{Partner 3: \tima} |
---|
[161] | 68 | |
---|
[63] | 69 | \begin{description} |
---|
[57] | 70 | \item [Equipment] |
---|
[161] | 71 | No specific equipment acquisition. |
---|
[57] | 72 | \item [Personnel costs] |
---|
[161] | 73 | The permanent personnels involved in the project are professor and assistant professor |
---|
| 74 | (Fr\'ed\'eric P\'etrot and Olivier Muller). |
---|
| 75 | The non permanent personnels are Phd students and post-doc researchers. |
---|
[164] | 76 | Related costs are estimated in \hommemois. |
---|
[161] | 77 | One phd student (Adrien Prost-Boucle), funded by the french ministry of research, will |
---|
| 78 | be working on the project. |
---|
| 79 | One 100\% funded phd student will be hired in september 2010. A post-doc researcher will |
---|
| 80 | be hired at the end of 2011 for one year and an half. |
---|
| 81 | The PhD student will mainly work on the evolution of UGH HLS tool. Thus, we are looking |
---|
| 82 | for a profile with strong informatic skills and good knowledge in computer architecture. |
---|
| 83 | The post-doc will mainly work on dynamic reconfiguration and HPC. The required profile |
---|
| 84 | will be more oriented on computer architecture and advanced digital design. |
---|
| 85 | \parlf |
---|
[162] | 86 | The table below sumarizes the man power in \hommemois by tasks for both permanent and |
---|
[161] | 87 | non-permanent personnels. The detail by deliverables is given in |
---|
| 88 | figure~\ref{table-livrables-1}. |
---|
| 89 | The requested funding for personnels represent 50\% of the total personnal costs. |
---|
| 90 | The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 85\% of the total ANR requested |
---|
| 91 | funding. |
---|
| 92 | \begin{center}\input{table_tima_short.tex}\end{center} |
---|
[57] | 93 | \item [Subcontracting] |
---|
[161] | 94 | No subcontracting costs. |
---|
[57] | 95 | \item [Travel] |
---|
[161] | 96 | The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as participation to |
---|
| 97 | conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 11\% of the total requested ANR funding. |
---|
[57] | 98 | \item [Expenses for inward billing] |
---|
[161] | 99 | The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% of the total |
---|
| 100 | requested ANR funding. |
---|
[63] | 101 | \end{description} |
---|
[57] | 102 | |
---|
[53] | 103 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
---|
[121] | 104 | \subsection{Partner 4: \ubs} |
---|
[53] | 105 | |
---|
[70] | 106 | \begin {description} |
---|
| 107 | \item [Equipment] |
---|
[161] | 108 | In order to validate the design flow project, the LabSTICC laboratory will buy FPGA |
---|
| 109 | developpement boards. The cost for these FPGA boards is estimated to 3\% of the total |
---|
| 110 | ANR funding. |
---|
[70] | 111 | \item [Personnel costs] |
---|
[161] | 112 | The faculty members involved in the project are associate professors (Philippe COUSSY, |
---|
| 113 | Cyrille CHAVET) or research engineers (Dominique HELLER). All non-permanent personnel |
---|
[164] | 114 | costs are estimated in \hommemois for senior researchers (post-doc or research |
---|
[161] | 115 | engineers). |
---|
| 116 | \parlf |
---|
[162] | 117 | The table below sumarizes the man power in \hommemois by tasks for both permanent and |
---|
[161] | 118 | non-permanent personnels. The detail by deliverables is given in |
---|
| 119 | figure~\ref{table-livrables-2}. |
---|
| 120 | The non-permanent personnels costs represent 50\% of the personnal costs. |
---|
| 121 | The requested funding for non permanent personnels is about 83\% of the total ANR |
---|
| 122 | requested funding. |
---|
| 123 | \begin{center}\input{table_ubs_short.tex}\end{center} |
---|
[70] | 124 | \item [Subcontracting] |
---|
[161] | 125 | No subcontracting costs. |
---|
[70] | 126 | \item [Travel] |
---|
[161] | 127 | The travel costs are associated to management and meeting as well as participation to |
---|
| 128 | conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 10\% of the total requested ANR funding. |
---|
[70] | 129 | \item [Expenses for inward billing] |
---|
[161] | 130 | The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% of the total |
---|
| 131 | requested ANR funding. |
---|
[70] | 132 | \end {description} |
---|
| 133 | |
---|
| 134 | |
---|
[53] | 135 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
---|
[121] | 136 | \subsection{Partner 5: \upmc} |
---|
[162] | 137 | |
---|
[58] | 138 | \begin{description} |
---|
| 139 | \item[Equipment] |
---|
| 140 | No specific equipment acquisition is required for this project. |
---|
[162] | 141 | The costs for depreciation of workstations and pre-existing FPGA boards are evaluated |
---|
| 142 | to 7\% of the total requested ANR funding. |
---|
[58] | 143 | \item[Personnel costs] |
---|
[162] | 144 | The permanent personnels involved in the project are professors or assistant |
---|
| 145 | processors (Alain Greiner and Ivan Aug\'e). |
---|
| 146 | All non permanent personnel costs are estimated in \hommemois for senior researchers |
---|
| 147 | (post-doc or research engineers). |
---|
| 148 | The table below sumarizes the man power by tasks in \hommemois for both permanent and |
---|
| 149 | non-permanent personnels. |
---|
| 150 | The detail by deliverables is given in figure~\ref{table-livrables-2}. |
---|
[58] | 151 | The non-permanent personnels costs represent 50\% of the personnal costs. |
---|
| 152 | The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 79\% of the total ANR |
---|
| 153 | requested funding. |
---|
| 154 | \begin{center}\input{table_upmc_short.tex}\end{center} |
---|
| 155 | \item[Subcontracting] |
---|
| 156 | No subcontracting costs. |
---|
| 157 | \item[Travel] |
---|
| 158 | The travel costs are associated to management and coordination meeting as |
---|
| 159 | well as participation to conferences. The travel costs are estimated |
---|
| 160 | to 10\% of the total requested ANR funding. |
---|
| 161 | \item[Expenses for inward billing] |
---|
| 162 | The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% |
---|
| 163 | of the total requested ANR funding. |
---|
| 164 | \end{description} |
---|
[53] | 165 | |
---|
| 166 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
---|
[121] | 167 | \subsection{Partner 6: \xilinx} |
---|
[114] | 168 | |
---|
[99] | 169 | \begin{description} |
---|
| 170 | \item[Equipment] |
---|
[162] | 171 | No specific equipment acquisition is required for this project. |
---|
[99] | 172 | \item[Personnel costs] |
---|
[162] | 173 | \xilinx employees involved in the project are permanent Software Engineers. |
---|
| 174 | The man power detail in \hommemois by deliverables is given in |
---|
| 175 | figure~\ref{table-livrables-1} and a sumary by task in the following table. |
---|
| 176 | \begin{center}\input{table_xilinx_short.tex}\end{center} |
---|
[99] | 177 | \item[Subcontracting] |
---|
[162] | 178 | No subcontracting costs. |
---|
[99] | 179 | \item[Travel] |
---|
[162] | 180 | The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as participation to |
---|
| 181 | conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 2\% of the total requested ANR funding. |
---|
[99] | 182 | \item[Expenses for inward billing] none |
---|
| 183 | \item[Other working costs] none |
---|
| 184 | \end{description} |
---|
[53] | 185 | |
---|
| 186 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
---|
[121] | 187 | \subsection{Partner 7: \bull} |
---|
[53] | 188 | |
---|
[114] | 189 | \begin{description} |
---|
| 190 | \item[Equipment] |
---|
| 191 | Acquisition of a FPGA development board will represent the main equipment cost for |
---|
| 192 | Bull in COACH. It is estimated at about 5\% (tbc) of the total funding. |
---|
| 193 | \item[Personnel costs] |
---|
| 194 | A permanent engineer will be assigned full time to the project for a duration of 20 |
---|
[164] | 195 | months as shown in the table below that gives the man power in \hommemois: |
---|
[126] | 196 | \begin{center}\input{table_bull_full.tex}\end{center} |
---|
[114] | 197 | \item[Subcontracting] |
---|
| 198 | No subcontracting costs. |
---|
| 199 | \item[Travel] |
---|
| 200 | Application of a standard 10\% of the total funding to travel costs. |
---|
| 201 | \item[Expenses for inward billing] |
---|
| 202 | Costs justified by inward billing are estimated to about 5\% of the total funding. |
---|
| 203 | \item[Other working costs] none |
---|
| 204 | \end{description} |
---|
| 205 | |
---|
| 206 | |
---|
[53] | 207 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
---|
[121] | 208 | \subsection{Partner 8: \thales} |
---|
[53] | 209 | |
---|
[123] | 210 | \begin{description} |
---|
| 211 | \item[Equipment] |
---|
| 212 | In order to validate the design flow,TRT will buy FPGA developpement boards. The cost |
---|
[125] | 213 | for these FPGA boards is estimated to 20 k\euro (6\% of the total ANR funding). |
---|
[123] | 214 | \item[Personnel costs] |
---|
[131] | 215 | The effort to adapt SPEAR DE to generate the input files to COACH framework is |
---|
[164] | 216 | estimated to 13 \hommemois. |
---|
| 217 | The effort to describe and develop the application is estimated to 14 \hommemois. |
---|
| 218 | Finally we need one \hommemois for the partiticipation to the global specification in task 2. |
---|
| 219 | This is sumarized in the table below: |
---|
[123] | 220 | \begin{center}\input{table_thales_full.tex}\end{center} |
---|
| 221 | \item[Subcontracting] |
---|
| 222 | No subcontracting costs. |
---|
| 223 | \item[Travel] |
---|
| 224 | The travel costs are associated to meeting, plenaries as well as participation to |
---|
[125] | 225 | conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 10 k\euro. The travel costs are estimated to |
---|
[123] | 226 | 5\% of the total requested ANR funding. |
---|
| 227 | \item[Expenses for inward billing] none |
---|
| 228 | \item[Other working costs] none |
---|
| 229 | \end{description} |
---|
| 230 | |
---|
[53] | 231 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
---|
[121] | 232 | \subsection{Partner 9: \zied} |
---|
[53] | 233 | |
---|
[123] | 234 | \begin{center}\input{table_zied_full.tex}\end{center} |
---|
| 235 | |
---|
[53] | 236 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
---|
[121] | 237 | \subsection{Partner 10: \navtel} |
---|
[53] | 238 | |
---|
[125] | 239 | \begin{description} |
---|
| 240 | \item[Equipment] |
---|
| 241 | Navtel will use FPGA board with ARM processors for the validation. |
---|
[131] | 242 | The costs for depreciation of the board and the instrument of test |
---|
[125] | 243 | are evaluated to 7\% of the total requested ANR funding. |
---|
| 244 | \item[Personnel costs] |
---|
[131] | 245 | A permanent engineer will be assigned on average 1/3 time for |
---|
| 246 | all the duration of the project. |
---|
[164] | 247 | The table below shows the estimated manpower cost in \hommemois for the deliverables. |
---|
[125] | 248 | \begin{center}\input{table_navtel_full.tex}\end{center} |
---|
| 249 | \item[Subcontracting] |
---|
| 250 | No subcontracting costs. |
---|
| 251 | \item[Travel] |
---|
| 252 | The travel costs are associated to meeting, plenaries as well as participation to |
---|
| 253 | conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 3 k\euro. |
---|
| 254 | \item[Expenses for inward billing] none |
---|
| 255 | \item[Other working costs] none |
---|
| 256 | \end{description} |
---|
[159] | 257 | % |
---|
| 258 | \begin{landscape} |
---|
| 259 | \begin{figure} |
---|
| 260 | \begin{small} |
---|
| 261 | \settowidth\desclen{XILINX RTL optimisation (5)} |
---|
| 262 | \def\resstablestyletitle#1{\parbox{\desclen}{\textit{#1}}} |
---|
| 263 | \begin{minipage}[b]{.47\linewidth}\center |
---|
| 264 | \input{table_inria_cairn_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex}\\ \irisa \vspace{2.5ex}\\ |
---|
| 265 | \input{table_xilinx_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex}\\ \xilinx\\ |
---|
| 266 | \end{minipage}\hfill\begin{minipage}[b]{.47\linewidth}\center |
---|
| 267 | \input{table_tima_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex} \\ \tima |
---|
| 268 | \end{minipage} |
---|
| 269 | \end{small} |
---|
[162] | 270 | \caption{\label{table-livrables-1} Man power in \hommemois for the deliverables (1)} |
---|
[159] | 271 | \end{figure} |
---|
| 272 | % |
---|
| 273 | \begin{figure} |
---|
| 274 | \begin{small} |
---|
| 275 | \settowidth\desclen{XILINX RTL optimisation (5)} |
---|
| 276 | \def\resstablestyletitle#1{\parbox{\desclen}{\textit{#1}}} |
---|
| 277 | \begin{minipage}[b]{.47\linewidth}\center |
---|
| 278 | \input{table_ubs_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex}\\ \ubs \vspace{2.5ex}\\ |
---|
[164] | 279 | %\input{table_thales_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex}\\ \thales \\ |
---|
[159] | 280 | \end{minipage}\hfill\begin{minipage}[b]{.47\linewidth}\center |
---|
| 281 | \input{table_upmc_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex} \\ \upmc |
---|
| 282 | \end{minipage} |
---|
| 283 | \end{small} |
---|
[162] | 284 | \caption{\label{table-livrables-2} Man power in \hommemois for the deliverables (2)} |
---|
[159] | 285 | \end{figure} |
---|
| 286 | \end{landscape} |
---|