Changeset 364 for anr


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Feb 10, 2011, 7:23:52 PM (14 years ago)
Author:
coach
Message:
 
Location:
anr
Files:
2 added
9 edited

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed

  • anr/annexe-autre-participation.tex

    r362 r364  
    2424\begin{autreprojettabular}
    2525\autreprojettabularentry
    26     {2}{Greiner}{4}
    27     {Tsar, CATRENE, 400 k\euro}
    28     {Tera Scale ARchitecture}
    29     {\makebox{Huy-Nam} Nguyen (Bull)}
    30     {04/01/2008 05/31/2011}
    31 \autreprojettabularentry
    32     {7}{Nguyen}{8}
    33     {Tsar, CATRENE, 695 k\euro}
    34     {Tera Scale ARchitecture}
    35     {\makebox{Huy-Nam} Nguyen (Bull)}
    36     {04/01/2008 05/31/2011}
     26    {1}{Avot}{6}
     27    {BDREAMS, MEDEA+, 306 k\euro}
     28    {Design Refinement of Embedded Analogue and Mixed Signal Systems}
     29    {\makebox{Serge Scotti} (STM)}
     30    {01/06/2008 31//05/2012}
     31%\autreprojettabularentry
     32%    {1}{Lucas}{6}
     33%    {SoCKeT, DGCIS, 320 k\euro}
     34%    {SoC toolKit for critical Embedded sysTems}
     35%    {\makebox{Vincent LEFFTZ} (Astrium)}
     36%    {01/06/2008 30/09/2012}
     37%\autreprojettabularentry
     38%    {2}{Greiner}{4}
     39%    {Tsar, CATRENE, 400 k\euro}
     40%    {Tera Scale ARchitecture}
     41%    {\makebox{Huy-Nam} Nguyen (Bull)}
     42%    {04/01/2008 05/31/2011}
     43%\autreprojettabularentry
     44%    {7}{Nguyen}{8}
     45%    {Tsar, CATRENE, 695 k\euro}
     46%    {Tera Scale ARchitecture}
     47%    {\makebox{Huy-Nam} Nguyen (Bull)}
     48%    {04/01/2008 05/31/2011}
     49%\autreprojettabularentry
     50%    {3}{Coussy}{3}
     51%    {SoCKeT, FUI, 177 k\euro}
     52%    {SoC toolKit for critical Embedded sysTems}
     53%    {\makebox{Vincent LEFFTZ} (Astrium)}
     54%    {01/06/2008 31/12/2011}
    3755\autreprojettabularentry
    3856    {5}{P\'etrot}{3}
    … …  
    4159    {\makebox{Dominique} Marron (STMicroelectronics)}
    4260    {01/02/2009 31/01/2012}
    43 \autreprojettabularentry
    44     {5}{P\'etrot}{3}
    45     {SoftSoC, MEDEA+, 500 k\euro}
    46     {Software for SoC}
    47     {\makebox{Anne-Marie} Foulliard (Thales Communications)}
    48     {1/03/2008 28/02/2011}
     61%\autreprojettabularentry
     62%    {5}{P\'etrot}{3}
     63%    {SoftSoC, MEDEA+, 500 k\euro}
     64%    {Software for SoC}
     65%    {\makebox{Anne-Marie} Foulliard (Thales Communications)}
     66%    {1/03/2008 28/02/2011}
    4967\autreprojettabularentry
    5068    {5}{P\'etrot}{3}
    … …  
    5472    {01/03/2009 28/02/2012}
    5573\autreprojettabularentry
    56     {5}{Muller}{4}
    57     {iGlance, CATRENE, 550 k\euro}
    58     {Interactive Genius Look At Numerous Contemporary Events}
    59     {\makebox{Michel} Imbert (STMicroelectronics)}
    60     {01/07/2008 30/06/2011}
    61 \autreprojettabularentry
    62     {8}{Lemonier}{3}
    63     {FORFOR, ANR Arpege, 305 k\euro}
    64     {\mustbecompleted{TITRE (TRT)}}
    65     {\makebox{Muller} (LEAT)}
    66     {01/01/2008 31/12/2010}
    67 \autreprojettabularentry
    68     {8}{Lemonier}{4}
    69     {FREIA, ANR Arpege, 280 k\euro}
    70     {\mustbecompleted{TITRE (TRT)}}
    71     {\makebox{Blondeau} (Amines)}
    72     {01/01/2008 31/12/2010}
     74    {6}{Derrien}{5}
     75    {BioWic, ANR Arpege, 136 k\euro}
     76    {Hardware acceleration of bioinformatic algorithms}
     77    {\makebox{Dominique Lavenier} (IRISA)}
     78    {01/01/2009 31/12/2011}
     79%\autreprojettabularentry
     80%    {5}{Muller}{4}
     81%    {iGlance, CATRENE, 550 k\euro}
     82%    {Interactive Genius Look At Numerous Contemporary Events}
     83%    {\makebox{Michel} Imbert (STMicroelectronics)}
     84%    {01/07/2008 30/06/2011}
     85%\autreprojettabularentry
     86%    {8}{Lemonier}{3}
     87%    {FORFOR, ANR Arpege, 305 k\euro}
     88%    {\mustbecompleted{TITRE (TRT)}}
     89%    {\makebox{Muller} (LEAT)}
     90%    {01/01/2008 31/12/2010}
     91%\autreprojettabularentry
     92%    {8}{Lemonier}{4}
     93%    {FREIA, ANR Arpege, 280 k\euro}
     94%    {\mustbecompleted{TITRE (TRT)}}
     95%    {\makebox{Blondeau} (Amines)}
     96%    {01/01/2008 31/12/2010}
    7397\autreprojettabularentry
    7498    {8}{Lemonier}{3}
    … …  
    89113    {\makebox{Fr\'ed\'eric Thomas} (OBEO)}
    90114    {01/01/2010 31/12/2012}
    91 \autreprojettabularentry
    92     {6}{Derrien}{5}
    93     {BioWic, ANR Arpege, 136 k\euro}
    94     {Hardware acceleration of bioinformatic algorithms}
    95     {\makebox{Dominique Lavenier} (IRISA)}
    96     {01/01/2009 31/12/2011}
    97 \autreprojettabularentry
    98     {3}{Coussy}{3}
    99     {SoCKeT, FUI, 177 k\euro}
    100     {SoC toolKit for critical Embedded sysTems}
    101     {\makebox{Coordinator Vincent LEFFTZ} (Astrium)}
    102     {01/06/2008 31/12/2011}
    103115\end{autreprojettabular}
    104116%

  • anr/section-1.tex

    r357 r364  
    1 The market of digital systems is about 4,600 M\$ today and is estimated to 5,600 M\$ in 2012. However the ever growing applications complexity involves integration of heterogeneous technologies and requires the design of complex Multi-Processors System on Chip (MPSoC). During the last decade, the use of ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits) appeared to be more and more reserved to high volume markets, because the design and fabrication costs of such components exploded, due to increasing NRE (Non Recurring-Engineering) costs. Fortunately, FPGA (Field Programmable Gate Array) components, such as the Virtex6 family from XILINX or the Stratix4 family from ALTERA, can nowadays implement a complete MPSoC with multiple processors and several dedicated coprocessors for a few Keuros per device.
     1%
     2The market of digital systems is about 4,600 M\$ today and is estimated to 5,600 M\$ in 2012. However the ever growing applications complexity involves integration of heterogeneous technologies and requires the design of complex Multi-Processors System on Chip (MPSoC). During the last decade, the use of ASICs appeared to be more and more reserved to high volume markets, because the design and fabrication costs of such components exploded, due to increasing NRE (Non Recurring-Engineering) costs. Fortunately, recent FPGA components, such as the Virtex5-6 family from XILINX or the Stratix4 family from ALTERA, can nowadays implement a complete MPSoC with multiple processors and several dedicated coprocessors for a few Keuros per device.
    23\parlf
    3 Many applications are initially captured algorithmically in High-Level Languages (HLLs) such as C/C++. This has led to growing interest in tools that can provide an implementation path directly from HLLs to hardware. Thus, Electronic System Level (ESL) design methodologies (Virtual Prototyping, Co-design, High-Level Synthesis...) are now mature and allow the automation of a system-level design flow. Unfortunately, ESL tool development today has primarily focused on the design of hardwired devices i.e. ASICs and ASSPs (Application Specific Standard Product). However, the increasing sophistication of FPGAs has accelerated the need for FPGA-based ESL design methodologies. ESL methodologies hold the promise of streamlining the design approach by accepting designs written in C/C++ language and implementing the function straight into FPGA. Coupling FPGA technologies and ESL methodologies will allow both Small and Medium Enterprise and major companies to design innovative devices and to enter new, low and medium volume markets. Furthermore, today there is an increasing industrial interest to IC that integrates both hardwired CPU cores or MPSoC and a configurable area (FPGA) such as Intel-ATOM E600C. Probably in few years, such chips will become current and even standard general purpose CPU cores will contains a configurable area making explode the low and medium volume markets of digital systems. COACH’s objective is to provide an integrated design flow for the design of multi-processors digital systems targeting FPGA devices. It will be dedicated to system/software designers, and hide as much as possible the hardware characteristics to the end-user. COACH will mainly target three kinds of digital systems: 1/ Embedded and autonomous application such as personal digital assistants (PDA), ambient computing components, or wireless sensor networks, 2/ PCI-E extension boards connected to a PC to accelerate a specific application, it is the domain of High-Performance Computing (HPC) and High-Speed Signal Processing, 3/ Sub-system application for generating an IP to a larger system. The COACH open-source environment will integrate several hardware and software technologies:
     4Many applications are initially captured algorithmically in High-Level Languages (HLLs) such as C/C++. This has led to growing interest in tools that can provide an implementation path directly from HLLs to hardware. Thus, Electronic System Level (ESL) design methodologies (Virtual Prototyping, Co-design, High-Level Synthesis...) are now mature and allow the automation of a system-level design flow. Unfortunately, ESL tool development today has primarily focused on the design of hardwired devices i.e. ASICs and ASSPs (Application Specific Standard Product). However, the increasing sophistication of FPGAs has accelerated the need for FPGA-based ESL design methodologies. ESL methodologies hold the promise of streamlining the design approach by accepting designs written in C/C++ language and implementing the function straight into FPGA. Coupling FPGA technologies and ESL methodologies will allow both SMES and major companies to design innovative devices and to enter new, low and medium volume markets. Furthermore, today there is an increasing industrial interest to IC that integrates both hardwired CPU cores or MPSoC and a configurable area (FPGA) such as Intel-ATOM E600C. In few years, such chips will surely currently used in embedded systems and even standard general purpose CPU cores will contains a configurable area making explode the low and medium volume markets of digital systems.
     5\parlf
     6COACH is aligned with this long term vision, which requires an integrated design flow for the digital multiprocessors systems, targeting FPGAs and dedicated to the system and software designers; this project don’t intend to solve all related issues, but aims at specifying and implementing innovative technological elements of the required tool chain. It will be dedicated to system/software designers, and hide as much as possible the hardware characteristics to the end-user. COACH will mainly target three kinds of digital systems: 1/ Embedded and autonomous application (personal digital assistants , ambient computing components, wireless sensor networks) 2/ mixed systems (CPU + FPGA extension boards) to accelerate a specific application answering High-Performance Computing (HPC) and High-Speed Signal Processing needs, 3/ Sub-system IP to be integrating into a larger system.
     7\\
     8The COACH open-source environment will integrate several hardware and software technologies:
    49%
    510\begin{itemize}
    6 \item Design Space Exploration by allowing to describe an application as a process network i.e. a set of tasks communicating through FIFO channels and to map the application on a shared-memory, MPSoC architecture.
    7 \item Hardware Accelerators Synthesis by allowing the automatic generation of hardware accelerators when required
    8 \item Platform based design: three architectural templates will be provided (free-generic and ALTERA and XILINX’s IPs based).
    9 \item Hardware/Software communication middleware by implementing an homogeneous HW/SW communication infrastructure and communication APIs (Application Programming Interface), that will be used for communications between software tasks running on embedded processors and dedicated hardware coprocessors.
    10 \item Interaction with the industrial world: the framework will be open to the industrial world by using IP-XACT standard for describing the components of the architectural template and by providing the IP-XACT description of the generated MPSoC.
     11\item Design Space Exploration by allowing to describe an application as a process network i.e. a set of tasks communicating through FIFO channels and to map the application on a shared-memory, MPSoC architecture
     12\item High Level Synthesis  of hardware accelerators
     13\item Platform based design: three architectural templates will be provided (free-generic and ALTERA and XILINX’s IPs based)
     14\item Hardware/Software communication middleware by implementing an homogeneous HW/SW communication infrastructure and communication APIs, that will be used for communications between software tasks running on embedded processors and dedicated hardware coprocessors
     15\item IP based design: using IP-XACT standard for describing the components of the architectural template and by providing the IP-XACT description of the generated MPSoC
    1116\end{itemize}
    1217%
    13 \mustbecompleted{LIST NON A JOUR}
    14 The major FPGA companies (\xilinx and \altera) have expressed their interest for
    15 this project.
    16 Finally, the COACH project is already supported by a large number of SMEs, as demonstrated by the
    17 "letters of interest" (see Annex B), that have been collected during the preparation of the project :
    18 ADACSYS, MDS, INPIXAL, CAMKA System, ATEME, ALSIM, SILICOMP-AQL,
    19 ABOUND Logic, EADS-ASTRIUM.
     18Finally,a large number of SMEs and large companies, (see "letters of interest" Annex \ref{lettre-soutien}),
     19have expressed their interest for this project:
     20\altera, FLEXRAS, INPIXAL, CAMKA System, RENESAS Design,
     21\mustbecompleted{ ADACSYS, ATEME, ALSIM, SILICOMP-AQL, ABOUND Logic, EADS-ASTRIUM.}.\\
     22\altera, a major FPGA company provides FPGA cards to the project.
     23These companies are either FPGA providers (engaged to collaborate by delivering FPGA board to partners),
     24design houses, EDA companies, or system integrators.
     25This heterogeneity of actors show the strong added value brought by the COACH platform.
    2026
    21 %% % les objectifs globaux,
    22 %% The market of digital systems is about 4,600 M\$ today and is estimated to
    23 %% 5,600 M\$ in 2012. However the ever growing application complexity involves
    24 %% integration of heterogeneous technologies and requires the design of
    25 %% complex Multi-Processors System on Chip (MPSoC).
    26 %% \\
    27 %% During the last decade, the use of ASICs (Application Specific
    28 %% Integrated Circuits) appeared to be more and more reserved to high volume markets, because
    29 %% the design and fabrication costs of such components exploded, due to increasing NRE (Non
    30 %% Recurring-Engineering) costs.
    31 %% Fortunately, FPGA (Field Programmable Gate Array) components, such as the
    32 %% Virtex6 family from \xilinx or the Stratix4 family from \altera, can nowadays
    33 %% implement a complete MPSoC with multiple processors and several dedicated
    34 %% coprocessors for a few Keuros per device.
    35 %% \\
    36 %% Many applications are initially captured
    37 %% algorithmically in High-Level Languages (HLLs) such as C/C++. This has led to growing interest
    38 %% in tools that can provide an implementation path directly from HLLs to hardware.
    39 %% Thus, Electronic System Level (ESL) design methodologies (Virtual Prototyping,
    40 %% Co-design, High-Level Synthesis...) are now mature and allow the automation of
    41 %% a system-level design flow. Unfortunately, ESL tool development to date has primarily focused
    42 %% on the design of hard-wired devices i.e. ASICs and ASSPs (Application Specific Standard Product).
    43 %% However, the increasing sophistication of FPGAs has accelerated the need for FPGA-based ESL design
    44 %% methodologies. ESL methodologies hold the promise of streamlining the design approach by accepting
    45 %% designs written in the C/C++ language and implementing the function directly into FPGA.
    46 %% We believe that coupling FPGA technologies and ESL methodologies
    47 %% will allow both SMEs (Small and Medium Enterprise) and major companies to design innovative
    48 %% devices and to enter new, low and medium volume markets.
    49 %% Furthermore, today there is an increasing industrial interest into IC
    50 %% that integrates both hardwired CPU cores or MPSoC and a configurable area (FPGA)
    51 %% such as the ATOM E600C chip (Intel).
    52 %% In few a years, one can expect that such chips will become current. Even standard
    53 %% general purpose CPU cores will contains a configurable area
    54 %% bringing an explosion in low and medium volume markets.
    55 %% \parlf
    56 %% The objective of COACH is to provide an integrated design flow for the design of
    57 %% multi-processors digital systems targeting FPGA devices.
    58 %% It will be dedicated to system/software designers, and hide as much as possible
    59 %% the hardware characteristics to the end-user.
    60 %% COACH will mainly target three kinds of digital systems:
    61 %% 1) embedded and autonomous application such as  personal digital assistants (PDA),
    62 %%    ambient computing components, or wireless sensor networks (WSN);
    63 %% 2) PCI/E extension boards connected to a PC to accelerate a specific application,
    64 %%    it is the domain of High-Performance Computing (HPC) and High-Speed Signal Processing (HSSP);
    65 %% 3) sub-system application for generating an IP to a larger system.
    66 %% \parlf
    67 %% %verrous scientifiques et techniques
    68 %% The COACH environment will integrate several hardware and software technologies:
    69 %% \begin{description}
    70 %% \item[Design Space Exploration:]
    71 %%     The COACH environment will allow to describe an application as a process
    72 %%      network i.e. a set of tasks communicating through FIFO channels.
    73 %%      COACH will allow to map the application on a shared-memory, MPSoC architecture.
    74 %%     It will permit to easily explore the design space to help the system designer
    75 %%      to define the proper hardware/software partitioning of the application.
    76 %%     For each point in the design space, metrics such as throughput, latency, power
    77 %%     consumption, silicon area, memory allocation and data locality will be provided.
    78 %% \item[Hardware Accelerators Synthesis (HAS):]
    79 %%     COACH will allow the automatic generation of hardware accelerators when required.
    80 %%     Hence, High-Level Synthesis (HLS) tools, Application Specific Instruction Processor
    81 %%     (ASIP) design environments and source-level transformation tools (loop transformations
    82 %%     and memory optimization) will be provided.
    83 %%     This will allow further exploration of the micro-architectural design space.
    84 %%     HLS tools are sensitive to the coding style of the input specification and the domain
    85 %%     they target (control vs. data dominated).
    86 %%     The HLS tools of COACH will support a common language and coding style to avoid
    87 %%     re-engineering by the designer.
    88 %% \item[Platform based design:]
    89 %%     COACH will handle both \altera and \xilinx FPGA devices.
    90 %%     COACH will define architectural templates that can be customized by adding
    91 %%     dedicated coprocessors and ASIPs and by fixing template parameters such as
    92 %%     the number of embedded processors, the number and size of embedded memory banks
    93 %%     or the embedded operating system.
    94 %%     However, the specification of the application will be independent of both the
    95 %%     architectural template and the target FPGA device.
    96 %%     Basically, the following three architectural templates will be provided:
    97 %%     \begin{enumerate}
    98 %%     \item A Neutral architectural template based on the SoCLib IP core library and the
    99 %%       VCI/OCP communication infrastructure.
    100 %%     \item An \altera architectural template based on the \altera IP core library, the
    101 %%       AVALON system bus and the NIOS processor.
    102 %%     \item A \xilinx architectural template based on the \xilinx IP core library,
    103 %%       the \xilinxbus system bus and the \xilinxcpu processor.
    104 %%     \end{enumerate}
    105 %% \item[Hardware/Software communication middleware:]
    106 %%     COACH will implement an homogeneous HW/SW communication infrastructure and
    107 %%     communication APIs (Application Programming Interface), that will be used for
    108 %%     communications between software tasks running on embedded processors and
    109 %%     dedicated hardware coprocessors.
    110 %% \item[Interaction with the industrial world:]
    111 %%     COACH will not be a closed framework but it will be opened to the industrial
    112 %%     world by using the IP-XACT format \cite{IP-XACT-08} for describing the components of the
    113 %%     architectural template and by providing the IP-XACT description of the generated MPSoC.
    114 %%     This should facilitate the enhancement of the architectural template with IP and the
    115 %%     integration of the IP produced by COACH in larger design.
    116 %% \end{description}
    117 %% %From the end user point of view, the specification of the application will be
    118 %% %independant from both the architectural template and from the selected FPGA
    119 %% %family.
    120 %% \parlf
    121 %% % le programme de travail
    122 %% %The COACH project targets fundamental issues related to design methodologies for
    123 %% %digital systems by providing estimation, exploration and design tools targeting both
    124 %% %performance and power optimization at all the abstraction levels of the flow (system,
    125 %% %architecture, algorithm and logic).
    126 %% To reach this ambitious goal, the project will rely on the experience and the
    127 %% %complementariness
    128 %% synergy of the partners in the following domains:
    129 %% Operating system and communication middleware (\tima, \upmc),
    130 %% MPSoC architectures (\tima, \ubs, \upmc),
    131 %% ASIP architectures (\inria),
    132 %% High Level Synthesis (\tima, \ubs, \upmc), and compilation (\lip),
    133 %% HPC (\bull, \thales, \lip), tools integration in IP-XACT flow (\mds).
    134 %% \\
    135 %% The COACH project does not start from scratch.
    136 %% It relies
    137 %% on the Magillem industrial platform for the integration into IP-XACT flows,
    138 %% on the SoCLib platform~\cite{soclib} for prototyping and operating systems (DNA/OS),
    139 %% on the GAUT~\cite{gaut08} and UGH~\cite{ugh08} tools for HLS,
    140 %% on the ROMA~\cite{roma, RAFFIN:2010:INRIA-00539874:1} project for ASIP,
    141 %% on the SYNTOL~\cite{syntol} and BEE~\cite{bee} tools for source-level analysis and
    142 %% transformations,
    143 %% and on the \xilinx and \altera IP core libraries.
    144 %% Finally it will use the \xilinx and \altera logic and physical synthesis tools
    145 %% to generate the FPGA configuration bitstreams.
    146 %% %The main development steps of the COACH project are:
    147 %% %\begin{enumerate}
    148 %% %   \item Definition of the end user inputs:
    149 %% %    The coarse grain parallelism of the application will be described as a communicating
    150 %% %    task graph, each task being described in C language.
    151 %% %    Similarly the architectural templates with their parameters and the design constraints
    152 %% %    will be specified.
    153 %% %  \item Definition of an internal format for representing task.
    154 %% %  \item Development of the GCC pluggin for generating the internal format of a
    155 %% %    C task.
    156 %% %  \item Adaptation of the existing HAS tools (BEE, SYNTOL, UGH, GAUT) to read and write
    157 %% %    the internal format. This will allow to swap from one tool to another one, and to
    158 %% %    chain them if necessary.
    159 %% %  \item Modification of the DSX tool (Design Space eXplorer) of the SocLib
    160 %% %    platform to generate the bitstream for the various FPGA families and architectural
    161 %% %    templates.
    162 %% %  \item Development of new tools such as ASIP compiler, HPC design environment and
    163 %% %    dynamic reconfiguration of FPGA devices.
    164 %% %\end{enumerate}
    165 %% \parlf
    166 %% The role of the industrial partners \bull, \thales and \mds is to provide
    167 %% real use cases to benchmark the COACH design environment and to analyze the designer productivity
    168 %% improvements.
    169 %% \parlf
    170 %% The COACH project will deliver an open and freely distributed infrastructure.
    171 %% The architectural templates and most of the software tools will be distributed under the
    172 %% GPL-like license.
    173 %% The VHDL synthesizable models for the neutral architectural template
    174 %% will also be freely available for non commercial use.
    175 %% For industrial exploitation the technology providers are ready to propose commercial licenses,
    176 %% directly to the end user, or through a third party.
    177 %% \parlf
    178 %% \mustbecompleted{LIST NON A JOUR}
    179 %% The major FPGA companies (\xilinx and \altera) have expressed their interest for
    180 %% this project.
    181 %% Finally, the COACH project is already supported by a large number of SMEs, as demonstrated by the
    182 %% "letters of interest" (see Annex B), that have been collected during the preparation of the project :
    183 %% ADACSYS, MDS, INPIXAL, CAMKA System, ATEME, ALSIM, SILICOMP-AQL,
    184 %% ABOUND Logic, EADS-ASTRIUM.
    185 %%

  • anr/section-consortium-desc.tex

    r361 r364  
    2727The approach to the use of the tools of industrials are:
    2828IP-XACT and industrial flow integration (\mds),
    29 HPC (\bull) and
    30 \mustbecompleted{XXX "par MAGILEM ou TRT"} (\thales).
     29HPC (\bull) and IP integration in SoC design flow (\mds, \thales).
    3130\thales will represent the FPGA users, \bull the HPC users, and \mds the SoC integrators.
    3231

  • anr/section-consortium-people.tex

    r363 r364  
    7070
    7171\peopletabularentry{\mds}           
    72 \CO & Vaumorin    & Emannuel    & \SPM                & ESL            & 20& Task: \TL{1}, \mustbecompleted{X, Y}, \TL{8}\\\hline
    73 \ME & Spasevski   & Cyril       & CTO                 & EDA            & 6 & Task: \mustbecompleted{X, Y} \\\hline
    74 \ME & Guntz       & St\'ephane  & \VPENG              & EDA            & 6 & Task: \mustbecompleted{X, Y} \\\hline
    75 \ME & Lucas       & Ronan       & R\&D Engineer       & Codesign       & 9 & Task: \mustbecompleted{X, Y} \\\hline
    76 \ME & Olivier     & Garry       & R\&D Engineer       & \SW             & 9 & Task: \mustbecompleted{X, Y} \\\hline
     72\CO & Vaumorin    & Emannuel    & \SPM                & ESL            & 20& Task: \TL{1}, 7, \TL{8}\\\hline
     73\ME & Spasevski   & Cyril       & CTO                 & EDA            & 6 & Task: 2, 7 \\\hline
     74\ME & Guntz       & St\'ephane  & \VPENG              & EDA            & 6 & Task: 7 \\\hline
     75\ME & Lucas       & Ronan       & R\&D Engineer       & Codesign       & 9 & Task: 3, 7 \\\hline
     76\ME & Olivier     & Garry       & R\&D Engineer       & \SW            & 9 & Task: 3, 7 \\\hline
    7777%\end{peopletabular}\begin{peopletabular}
    7878\peopletabularentry{\upmc}

  • anr/section-dissemination.tex

    r361 r364  
    168168\letterOfInterest{FlexRAS Technologies}{lettres-2011/Flexras.pdf},
    169169\letterOfInterest{INPIXAL}{lettres-2011/Inpixal.jpg},
     170\letterOfInterest{CAMKA System}{lettres-2011/Camka.pdf},
     171\letterOfInterest{RENESAS Design}{lettres-2011/Renesas.jpg},
    170172%\letterOfInterest{ADACSYS}{lettres-2011/Coach_ADACSYS_lettre_interet},
    171 %\letterOfInterest{CAMKA System}{lettres-2011/CAMKA-System.pdf},
    172173%\letterOfInterest{ATEME}{lettres-2011/ATEME.pdf},
    173174%\letterOfInterest{ALSIM Simulateur}{lettres-2011/Alsim.pdf},

  • anr/section-position.tex

    r358 r364  
    185185quality and reducing the design time and the cost of synthesised cryptographic devices.
    186186%
     187COACH will contribute to enhance the safety in design of critical system for two main reasons:
     188\begin{itemize}
     189  \item by providing a way to automate the mapping of application onto MPSoC
     190  architecture; code generators of the tool chain will be subject to
     191  certification.
     192  \item by relaying on design flow defined by SoCKET, which is dedicated to
     193  safety of critical systems, COACH will benefit from features related to
     194  requirements traceability.
     195\end{itemize}
     196%
    187197\subsubsection*{European and international positioning}
    188198%

  • anr/section-project-description.tex

    r356 r364  
    142142\item $T8$ and $T1$ depend on and impact all the other tasks.
    143143\end{itemize}
    144 This organisation offers enough robustness to insure the success of the
    145 project, the only critical task in this chart being $T2$. \label{xcoach-problem}
    146 %However, the partners met 12 times (a one-day meeting per month) during the last year.
    147 %Ten meeting were dedicated to preliminary technical discussions, including a tentative specification
    148 %of {\tt xcoach}. The other meetings were dedicated to the preparation of the present proposal.
    149 However, the partners had 10 one-day meetings where a preliminary draft of the
    150 \xcoach format was defined. This makes this task less critical.
     144%This organisation offers enough robustness to insure the success of the
     145%project, the only critical task in this chart being $T2$. \label{xcoach-problem}
     146%%However, the partners met 12 times (a one-day meeting per month) during the last year.
     147%%Ten meeting were dedicated to preliminary technical discussions, including a tentative specification
     148%%of {\tt xcoach}. The other meetings were dedicated to the preparation of the present proposal.
     149%However, the partners had 10 one-day meetings where a preliminary draft of the
     150%\xcoach format was defined. This makes this task less critical.
     151This project has been shaped with this chart in order to minimize the technical
     152risk: the task $T2$ handles the major technical issues to be solved and as it is
     153planned at the beginning of the project we will be able to react fast and take
     154decisions for possible workaround and enable the continuation of the work with
     155other tasks. Nevertheless, we are confident because upfront to this project,
     156academic partners are already working close togother and know well each other's
     157technologies, and also a lot of face to face meeting are planned at the
     158beginning of the project in task $T2$ in order to define the \xcoach format which is
     159the corner stone of the COACH platform.
    151160

  • anr/section-ressources.tex

    r363 r364  
    5656            \ifx\cont\tmp\def\cont{None.}\else\def\cont{%
    5757              The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated
    58               to #5\% of the total requested ANR funding.}\fi
     58              to \textbf{#5\%} of the total requested ANR funding.}\fi
    5959              \cont
    6060        %\item[Other working costs] None
    … …  
    8181%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
    8282
    83 The global effort is 358 \hommemois (\hommemoislong),
     83The global effort is \mustbecompleted{XXXXXXXX 358} \hommemois (\hommemoislong),
    8484the part of academic partners is 236 \hommemois (66\% of the global effort)
    8585and the part of the industrial partners is 122 \hommemois (\textbf{34\%} of the
    … …  
    100100  annexe~\ref{table-livrables-mds} (page \pageref{table-livrables-mds}).
    101101  and a summary by task in the following table.
    102    \mustbecompleted{\\MDS: Vous n'etes dans aucuns projets annexe 7.3 ?}
    103102  }
    104103  {2}
    105104  {}
    106 % 
    107 % \begin{description}
    108 % \item[Equipment]
    109 %   No specific equipment acquisition is required for this project.
    110 % \item[Personnel costs]
    111 %   \mds employees involved in the project are permanent managers, engineers and PhD graduates.
    112 %   The man power detail in \hommemois by deliverables is given in
    113 %   annexe~\ref{table-livrables-mds} (page \pageref{table-livrables-mds}).
    114 %   and a sumary by task in the following table.
    115 %   \begin{center}\input{table_mds_short.tex}\end{center}
    116 % \item[Subcontracting]
    117 %   No subcontracting costs.
    118 % \item[Travel]
    119 %   The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as participation to
    120 %   conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 2\% of the total requested ANR funding.
    121 % \item[Expenses for inward billing] none
    122 % \item[Other working costs] none
    123 % \end{description}
    124105
    125106%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
    … …  
    133114   }}
    134115  {8}{3.5}
    135 %
    136 % \begin{description}
    137 % \item[Equipment]
    138 %     In order to validate the COACH design flow, \upmc will buy FPGA development
    139 %     boards (especially 1  PCI/E FPGA \xilinx board).
    140 %     The cost for these boards is estimated to 6 k\euro (4\% of the total ANR funding).
    141 % \item[Personnel costs]
    142 %     The permanent personnels involved in the project are professors or assistant
    143 %     professors (Alain Greiner and Ivan Aug\'e).
    144 %     All non permanent personnel costs are estimated in \hommemois for senior researchers
    145 %     (post-doc or research engineers).
    146 %     The table below sumarizes the man power by tasks in \hommemois for both permanent  and
    147 %     non-permanent personnels.
    148 %     The detail by deliverables is given in annexe~\ref{table-livrables-upmc} (page \pageref{table-livrables-upmc}).
    149 %     The non-permanent personnels costs (24 \hommemois) represent 46\% of the personnal costs.
    150 %     The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 79\% of the total ANR
    151 %     requested funding.
    152 %     \begin{center}\input{table_upmc_short.tex}\end{center}
    153 % \item[Subcontracting]
    154 %     No subcontracting costs.
    155 % \item[Travel]
    156 %     The travel costs are associated to management and coordination meeting as
    157 %     well as participation to conferences. The travel costs are estimated
    158 %     to 10\% of the total requested ANR funding.
    159 % \item[Expenses for inward billing]
    160 %     The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\%
    161 %     of the total requested ANR funding.
    162 % \end{description}
    163116
    164117%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
    … …  
    168121  {ubs}
    169122  {}
    170   {{\ubs}{48}{24}{Philippe COUSSY, Cyrille CHAVET and Dominique HELLER}{84}{
     123  {{\ubs}{48}{24}{Philippe COUSSY, Cyrille CHAVET and Dominique HELLER}{85}{
    171124   We are looking for profiles with strong informatic skills, good knowledge
    172125   in computer architecture and advanced digital design.
    173    \mustbecompleted{\\UBS:  ./gantt < anr.gant\\
    174    \t WARNING: ubs       :D511 probleme sur l'an 1 (in table=7.0, in gantt=6.0 \\
    175    \t ERROR:   ubs       :D840 probleme sur l'an 1 (in table=0.5, in gantt=0.0}
    176126  }}
    177   {11}{4}
    178 
    179 % \begin {description}
    180 % \item [Equipment]
    181 %   In order to validate the design flow project, the Lab-STICC laboratory will buy FPGA
    182 %   development boards.  The cost for these FPGA boards is estimated to 3\% of the total
    183 %   ANR funding.
    184 % \item [Personnel costs]
    185 %   The faculty members involved in the project are associate professors (Philippe COUSSY,
    186 %   Cyrille CHAVET) or research engineers (Dominique HELLER). All non-permanent personnel
    187 %   costs are estimated in \hommemois for senior researchers (post-doc or research
    188 %   engineers).
    189 %   \parlf
    190 %   The table below summarizes the man power in \hommemois by tasks for both permanent and
    191 %   non-permanent personnels. The detail by deliverables is given in
    192 %   annexe~\ref{table-livrables-usb} (page \pageref{table-livrables-usb}).
    193 %   The non-permanent personnels costs represent 50\% of the personnel costs.
    194 %   The requested funding for non permanent personnels is about 83\% of the total ANR
    195 %   requested funding.
    196 %     \begin{center}\input{table_ubs_short.tex}\end{center}
    197 % \item [Subcontracting]
    198 %   No subcontracting costs.
    199 % \item [Travel]
    200 %   The travel costs are associated to management and meeting as well as participation to
    201 %   conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 10\% of the total requested ANR funding.
    202 % \item [Expenses for inward billing]
    203 %   The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% of the total
    204 %   requested ANR funding.
    205 % \end {description}
     127  {12}{4}
     128
    206129
    207130%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
    … …  
    209132\ressourcesForAcademic
    210133 {inria_compsys}{}
    211  {{\lip}{46}{21}{Christophe Alias and Paul Feautrier}{\mustbecompleted{100}}{
     134 {{\lip}{46}{21}{Christophe Alias and Paul Feautrier}{82}{
    212135   \\We are looking for a candidate with both theoretical and
    213136   practical skills, that will be able to get a sufficient
    … …  
    219142   }}
    220143 {12}{4}
    221 %
    222 % \begin{description}
    223 % \item [Equipment]
    224 %   No specific equipment acquisition. The costs for depreciation of
    225 %   workstations is evaluated to 4\% of the total requested ANR funding.
    226 % \item [Personnel costs] The faculty members involved in the project
    227 %   are Christophe Alias (INRIA researcher) and Paul Feautrier (emeritus
    228 %   professor at ENS-Lyon). The non-permanent personel required is a
    229 %   post-doc that will work on FIFO construction, then on extensions of
    230 %   process construction and memory optimization to non-polyhedral
    231 %   loops.  We are looking for a candidate with both theoretical and
    232 %   practical skills, that will be able to get a sufficient
    233 %   understanding of the polyhedral techniques to produce a working
    234 %   implementation.
    235 %   \parlf
    236 %   The table below summarizes the \hommemois by tasks for both permanent
    237 %   and non-permanent personnels.
    238 %   Annexe~\ref{table-livrables-lip} (page \pageref{table-livrables-lip})
    239 %   details this table at the deliverable level.
    240 %   The effort of permanent personnels represents 61\% of
    241 %   the total effort. The non-permanent personnels costs represents
    242 %   52\% of the personal costs. The requested funding for non permanent
    243 %   personnels is 100\% of the total ANR requested
    244 %   funding.
    245 %   \begin{center}\input{table_inria_compsys_short.tex}\end{center}
    246 % \item [Subcontracting]
    247 %   No subcontracting costs.
    248 % \item [Travel]
    249 %   The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as
    250 %   participation to conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 20\%
    251 %   of the total requested ANR funding.
    252 % \item [Expenses for inward billing]
    253 %   The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated
    254 %   to 4\% of the total requested ANR funding.
    255 % \end{description}
    256144
    257145%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
    … …  
    264152    }}
    265153 {10}{4}
    266 %
    267 % \begin{description}
    268 % \item [Equipment]
    269 %   No specific equipment acquisition.
    270 % \item [Personnel costs]
    271 %   The permanent personnels involved in the project are professor and associate professor
    272 %   (Fr\'ed\'eric P\'etrot and Olivier Muller).
    273 %   The non permanent personnels are Phd students and post-doc researchers.
    274 %   Related costs are estimated in \hommemois.
    275 %   One phd student (Adrien Prost-Boucle), funded by the French ministry of research, will
    276 %   be working on the project.
    277 %   One 100\% funded phd student will be hired in September 2011.
    278 %   A post-doc researcher will be hired at the end of 2012 for one year.
    279 %   The PhD student will mainly work on the evolution of UGH HLS tool. Thus, we are looking
    280 %   for a profile with strong informatic skills and good knowledge in computer architecture.
    281 %   The post-doc will mainly work on HPC. The required profile
    282 %   will be more oriented on computer architecture and advanced digital design.
    283 %   \parlf
    284 %   The table below summarizes the man power in \hommemois by tasks for both permanent and
    285 %   non-permanent personnels. The detail by deliverables is given in
    286 %   annexe~\ref{table-livrables-tima} (page \pageref{table-livrables-tima}).
    287 %   The effort of permanent personnels represents 50\% of the total effort.
    288 %   The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 86\% of the total ANR requested
    289 %   funding.
    290 %     \begin{center}\input{table_tima_short.tex}\end{center}
    291 % \item [Subcontracting]
    292 %   No subcontracting costs.
    293 % \item [Travel]
    294 %   The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as participation to
    295 %   conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 10\% of the total requested ANR funding.
    296 % \item [Expenses for inward billing]
    297 %   The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% of the total
    298 %   requested ANR funding.
    299 % \end{description}
    300154
    301155%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
    … …  
    308162   }}
    309163 {10}{4}
    310 %
    311 % \begin{description}
    312 % \item [Equipment]
    313 %   No specific equipment acquisition.
    314 % \item [Personnel costs] The faculty members involved in the project
    315 %   are François Charot (INRIA researcher) and Steven Derrien (associate
    316 %   professor).
    317 %   The non-permanent personal required is a PhD
    318 %   student that will mainly work on ASIP generation. We are looking for
    319 %   a profile with strong informatic skills and good knowledge in
    320 %   computer architecture.
    321 %   \parlf
    322 %   The table below summarizes the manpower in \hommemois by tasks for both permanent and
    323 %   non-permanent personnels. The detail by deliverables is given in
    324 %   annexe~\ref{table-livrables-inria} (page \pageref{table-livrables-inria}).
    325 %   The non-permanent personnels costs represent {48\%} of the personnal
    326 %   costs. The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 100\% of
    327 %   the total ANR requested funding.
    328 %     \begin{center}\input{table_inria_cairn_short.tex}\end{center}
    329 % \item [Subcontracting]
    330 %   No subcontracting costs.
    331 % \item [Travel]
    332 %   The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as participation to
    333 %   conferences. The travel costs are estimated to {7,5\%} of the total
    334 %   requested ANR funding.
    335 % \item [Expenses for inward billing]
    336 %   The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% of the total
    337 %   requested ANR funding.
    338 % \end{description}
    339164
    340165%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
    … …  
    353178    and an engineer  for 27 \hommemois.}
    354179  {10}{5}
    355 
    356 % \begin{description}
    357 % \item[Equipment]
    358 %     Acquisition of a FPGA development board will represent the main equipment cost for
    359 %     Bull in COACH. It is estimated at about 5\% (tbc) of the total funding.
    360 % \item[Personnel costs]
    361 %     A permanent engineer will be assigned full time to the project for a duration of 36
    362 %     months as shown in the table below that summarizes the man power in \hommemois.
    363 %     The detail  by deliverables is given in
    364 %     annexe~\ref{table-livrables-bull} (page \pageref{table-livrables-bull}).
    365 %     \begin{center}\input{table_bull_short.tex}\end{center}
    366 % \item[Subcontracting]
    367 %     No subcontracting costs.
    368 % \item[Travel]
    369 %     Application of a standard 10\% of the total funding to travel costs.
    370 % \item[Expenses for inward billing]
    371 %     Costs justified by inward billing are estimated to about 5\% of the total funding.
    372 % \item[Other working costs] none
    373 % \end{description}
    374 
    375180
    376181%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

  • anr/task-dissemination.tex

    r356 r364  
    8484         \OtherPartner{12}{36}{\Slip}   {0:1:1}
    8585         \OtherPartner{12}{36}{\Stima}  {0:1:1}
    86          \OtherPartner{12}{36}{\Subs}   {.5:1:1}
     86         \OtherPartner{12}{36}{\Subs}   {0:1:1.5}
    8787         \OtherPartner{12}{36}{\Supmc}  {0:1:1}
    8888         \OtherPartner{12}{36}{\Sbull}  {0:.5:.5}
Note: See TracChangeset for help on using the changeset viewer.