[123] | 1 | \def\resstablestyletitle#1{\begin{small}{\textit{#1}}\end{small}} |
---|
[53] | 2 | |
---|
| 3 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
---|
[121] | 4 | \subsection{Partner 1: \irisa} |
---|
[53] | 5 | |
---|
[121] | 6 | \begin{description} |
---|
| 7 | \item [Equipment] |
---|
[159] | 8 | No specific equipment acquisition. |
---|
[121] | 9 | \item [Personnel costs] The faculty members involved in the project |
---|
[228] | 10 | are François Charot (INRIA researcher), Steven Derrien (associate |
---|
| 11 | professor), Christophe Wolinski (professor) and Charles Wagner |
---|
| 12 | (research engineer). The non-permanent personal required is a PhD |
---|
| 13 | student that will mainly work on ASIP generation. We are looking for |
---|
| 14 | a profile with strong informatic skills and good knowledge in |
---|
| 15 | computer architecture. |
---|
[159] | 16 | \parlf |
---|
[164] | 17 | The table below summarizes the manpower in \hommemois by tasks for both permanent and |
---|
[159] | 18 | non-permanent personnels. The detail by deliverables is given in |
---|
| 19 | figure~\ref{table-livrables-1}. |
---|
[227] | 20 | The non-permanent personnels costs represent {48\%} of the personnal |
---|
[159] | 21 | costs. The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 100\% of |
---|
| 22 | the total ANR requested funding. |
---|
[121] | 23 | \begin{center}\input{table_inria_cairn_short.tex}\end{center} |
---|
| 24 | \item [Subcontracting] |
---|
[159] | 25 | No subcontracting costs. |
---|
[121] | 26 | \item [Travel] |
---|
[159] | 27 | The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as participation to |
---|
[227] | 28 | conferences. The travel costs are estimated to {7,5\%} of the total |
---|
[159] | 29 | requested ANR funding. |
---|
[121] | 30 | \item [Expenses for inward billing] |
---|
[159] | 31 | The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% of the total |
---|
| 32 | requested ANR funding. |
---|
[121] | 33 | \end{description} |
---|
| 34 | |
---|
| 35 | |
---|
| 36 | \subsection{Partner 2: \lip} |
---|
[192] | 37 | |
---|
[87] | 38 | \begin{description} |
---|
| 39 | \item [Equipment] |
---|
[167] | 40 | No specific equipment acquisition. The costs for depreciation of |
---|
| 41 | workstations is evaluated to 4\% of the total requested ANR funding. |
---|
[87] | 42 | \item [Personnel costs] |
---|
[167] | 43 | The faculty members involved in the project are an emeritus |
---|
| 44 | professor at ENS Lyon (Paul Feautrier) and a research associate |
---|
| 45 | (CR2) at INRIA Rh\^one-Alpes (Christophe Alias). The non-permanent |
---|
[174] | 46 | personel required is a PhD student that will work on network process |
---|
[167] | 47 | generation from polyhedral loops, then on extensions to |
---|
| 48 | non-polyhedral loops. We are looking for a student with both |
---|
| 49 | theoretical and practical skills, that will be able to get a |
---|
| 50 | sufficient understanding of the polyhedral techniques and to produce |
---|
| 51 | a working implementation. |
---|
[159] | 52 | \parlf |
---|
[174] | 53 | The table below summarizes the \hommemois by |
---|
[167] | 54 | deliverables and tasks for both permanent and non-permanent |
---|
[229] | 55 | personnels. The non-permanent personnels costs represent 26\% of |
---|
[167] | 56 | the personnal costs. The requested funding for non |
---|
| 57 | permanent personnels is 100\% of the total ANR requested funding. |
---|
[230] | 58 | \begin{center}\input{table_inria_compsys_full.tex}\end{center} |
---|
[87] | 59 | \item [Subcontracting] |
---|
[159] | 60 | No subcontracting costs. |
---|
[87] | 61 | \item [Travel] |
---|
[167] | 62 | The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as |
---|
| 63 | participation to conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 20\% |
---|
| 64 | of the total requested ANR funding. |
---|
[87] | 65 | \item [Expenses for inward billing] |
---|
[167] | 66 | The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated |
---|
| 67 | to 4\% of the total requested ANR funding. |
---|
[87] | 68 | \end{description} |
---|
| 69 | |
---|
[53] | 70 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
---|
[121] | 71 | \subsection{Partner 3: \tima} |
---|
[161] | 72 | |
---|
[63] | 73 | \begin{description} |
---|
[57] | 74 | \item [Equipment] |
---|
[161] | 75 | No specific equipment acquisition. |
---|
[57] | 76 | \item [Personnel costs] |
---|
[161] | 77 | The permanent personnels involved in the project are professor and assistant professor |
---|
| 78 | (Fr\'ed\'eric P\'etrot and Olivier Muller). |
---|
| 79 | The non permanent personnels are Phd students and post-doc researchers. |
---|
[164] | 80 | Related costs are estimated in \hommemois. |
---|
[161] | 81 | One phd student (Adrien Prost-Boucle), funded by the french ministry of research, will |
---|
| 82 | be working on the project. |
---|
| 83 | One 100\% funded phd student will be hired in september 2010. A post-doc researcher will |
---|
| 84 | be hired at the end of 2011 for one year and an half. |
---|
| 85 | The PhD student will mainly work on the evolution of UGH HLS tool. Thus, we are looking |
---|
| 86 | for a profile with strong informatic skills and good knowledge in computer architecture. |
---|
| 87 | The post-doc will mainly work on dynamic reconfiguration and HPC. The required profile |
---|
| 88 | will be more oriented on computer architecture and advanced digital design. |
---|
| 89 | \parlf |
---|
[162] | 90 | The table below sumarizes the man power in \hommemois by tasks for both permanent and |
---|
[161] | 91 | non-permanent personnels. The detail by deliverables is given in |
---|
| 92 | figure~\ref{table-livrables-1}. |
---|
| 93 | The requested funding for personnels represent 50\% of the total personnal costs. |
---|
| 94 | The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 85\% of the total ANR requested |
---|
| 95 | funding. |
---|
| 96 | \begin{center}\input{table_tima_short.tex}\end{center} |
---|
[57] | 97 | \item [Subcontracting] |
---|
[161] | 98 | No subcontracting costs. |
---|
[57] | 99 | \item [Travel] |
---|
[161] | 100 | The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as participation to |
---|
| 101 | conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 11\% of the total requested ANR funding. |
---|
[57] | 102 | \item [Expenses for inward billing] |
---|
[161] | 103 | The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% of the total |
---|
| 104 | requested ANR funding. |
---|
[63] | 105 | \end{description} |
---|
[57] | 106 | |
---|
[53] | 107 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
---|
[121] | 108 | \subsection{Partner 4: \ubs} |
---|
[53] | 109 | |
---|
[70] | 110 | \begin {description} |
---|
| 111 | \item [Equipment] |
---|
[197] | 112 | In order to validate the design flow project, the Lab-STICC laboratory will buy FPGA |
---|
[161] | 113 | developpement boards. The cost for these FPGA boards is estimated to 3\% of the total |
---|
| 114 | ANR funding. |
---|
[70] | 115 | \item [Personnel costs] |
---|
[161] | 116 | The faculty members involved in the project are associate professors (Philippe COUSSY, |
---|
| 117 | Cyrille CHAVET) or research engineers (Dominique HELLER). All non-permanent personnel |
---|
[164] | 118 | costs are estimated in \hommemois for senior researchers (post-doc or research |
---|
[161] | 119 | engineers). |
---|
| 120 | \parlf |
---|
[162] | 121 | The table below sumarizes the man power in \hommemois by tasks for both permanent and |
---|
[161] | 122 | non-permanent personnels. The detail by deliverables is given in |
---|
| 123 | figure~\ref{table-livrables-2}. |
---|
| 124 | The non-permanent personnels costs represent 50\% of the personnal costs. |
---|
| 125 | The requested funding for non permanent personnels is about 83\% of the total ANR |
---|
| 126 | requested funding. |
---|
| 127 | \begin{center}\input{table_ubs_short.tex}\end{center} |
---|
[70] | 128 | \item [Subcontracting] |
---|
[161] | 129 | No subcontracting costs. |
---|
[70] | 130 | \item [Travel] |
---|
[161] | 131 | The travel costs are associated to management and meeting as well as participation to |
---|
| 132 | conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 10\% of the total requested ANR funding. |
---|
[70] | 133 | \item [Expenses for inward billing] |
---|
[161] | 134 | The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% of the total |
---|
| 135 | requested ANR funding. |
---|
[70] | 136 | \end {description} |
---|
| 137 | |
---|
| 138 | |
---|
[53] | 139 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
---|
[121] | 140 | \subsection{Partner 5: \upmc} |
---|
[162] | 141 | |
---|
[58] | 142 | \begin{description} |
---|
| 143 | \item[Equipment] |
---|
| 144 | No specific equipment acquisition is required for this project. |
---|
[162] | 145 | The costs for depreciation of workstations and pre-existing FPGA boards are evaluated |
---|
| 146 | to 7\% of the total requested ANR funding. |
---|
[58] | 147 | \item[Personnel costs] |
---|
[162] | 148 | The permanent personnels involved in the project are professors or assistant |
---|
| 149 | processors (Alain Greiner and Ivan Aug\'e). |
---|
| 150 | All non permanent personnel costs are estimated in \hommemois for senior researchers |
---|
| 151 | (post-doc or research engineers). |
---|
| 152 | The table below sumarizes the man power by tasks in \hommemois for both permanent and |
---|
| 153 | non-permanent personnels. |
---|
| 154 | The detail by deliverables is given in figure~\ref{table-livrables-2}. |
---|
[58] | 155 | The non-permanent personnels costs represent 50\% of the personnal costs. |
---|
| 156 | The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 79\% of the total ANR |
---|
| 157 | requested funding. |
---|
| 158 | \begin{center}\input{table_upmc_short.tex}\end{center} |
---|
| 159 | \item[Subcontracting] |
---|
| 160 | No subcontracting costs. |
---|
| 161 | \item[Travel] |
---|
| 162 | The travel costs are associated to management and coordination meeting as |
---|
| 163 | well as participation to conferences. The travel costs are estimated |
---|
| 164 | to 10\% of the total requested ANR funding. |
---|
| 165 | \item[Expenses for inward billing] |
---|
| 166 | The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% |
---|
| 167 | of the total requested ANR funding. |
---|
| 168 | \end{description} |
---|
[53] | 169 | |
---|
| 170 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
---|
[278] | 171 | \subsection{Partner 6: \mds} |
---|
[114] | 172 | |
---|
[278] | 173 | \begin{ADDEDENV} |
---|
[99] | 174 | \begin{description} |
---|
| 175 | \item[Equipment] |
---|
[162] | 176 | No specific equipment acquisition is required for this project. |
---|
[99] | 177 | \item[Personnel costs] |
---|
[162] | 178 | \xilinx employees involved in the project are permanent Software Engineers. |
---|
| 179 | The man power detail in \hommemois by deliverables is given in |
---|
| 180 | figure~\ref{table-livrables-1} and a sumary by task in the following table. |
---|
[278] | 181 | \begin{center}\input{table_mds_short.tex}\end{center} |
---|
[99] | 182 | \item[Subcontracting] |
---|
[162] | 183 | No subcontracting costs. |
---|
[99] | 184 | \item[Travel] |
---|
[162] | 185 | The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as participation to |
---|
| 186 | conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 2\% of the total requested ANR funding. |
---|
[99] | 187 | \item[Expenses for inward billing] none |
---|
| 188 | \item[Other working costs] none |
---|
| 189 | \end{description} |
---|
[278] | 190 | \end{ADDEDENV} |
---|
[53] | 191 | |
---|
| 192 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
---|
[121] | 193 | \subsection{Partner 7: \bull} |
---|
[53] | 194 | |
---|
[114] | 195 | \begin{description} |
---|
| 196 | \item[Equipment] |
---|
| 197 | Acquisition of a FPGA development board will represent the main equipment cost for |
---|
| 198 | Bull in COACH. It is estimated at about 5\% (tbc) of the total funding. |
---|
| 199 | \item[Personnel costs] |
---|
| 200 | A permanent engineer will be assigned full time to the project for a duration of 20 |
---|
[164] | 201 | months as shown in the table below that gives the man power in \hommemois: |
---|
[126] | 202 | \begin{center}\input{table_bull_full.tex}\end{center} |
---|
[114] | 203 | \item[Subcontracting] |
---|
| 204 | No subcontracting costs. |
---|
| 205 | \item[Travel] |
---|
| 206 | Application of a standard 10\% of the total funding to travel costs. |
---|
| 207 | \item[Expenses for inward billing] |
---|
| 208 | Costs justified by inward billing are estimated to about 5\% of the total funding. |
---|
| 209 | \item[Other working costs] none |
---|
| 210 | \end{description} |
---|
| 211 | |
---|
| 212 | |
---|
[53] | 213 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
---|
[121] | 214 | \subsection{Partner 8: \thales} |
---|
[53] | 215 | |
---|
[123] | 216 | \begin{description} |
---|
| 217 | \item[Equipment] |
---|
| 218 | In order to validate the design flow,TRT will buy FPGA developpement boards. The cost |
---|
[268] | 219 | for these FPGA boards is estimated to 10 k\euro (6\% of the total ANR funding). |
---|
[123] | 220 | \item[Personnel costs] |
---|
[131] | 221 | The effort to adapt SPEAR DE to generate the input files to COACH framework is |
---|
[164] | 222 | estimated to 13 \hommemois. |
---|
| 223 | The effort to describe and develop the application is estimated to 14 \hommemois. |
---|
| 224 | Finally we need one \hommemois for the partiticipation to the global specification in task 2. |
---|
| 225 | This is sumarized in the table below: |
---|
[123] | 226 | \begin{center}\input{table_thales_full.tex}\end{center} |
---|
| 227 | \item[Subcontracting] |
---|
| 228 | No subcontracting costs. |
---|
| 229 | \item[Travel] |
---|
| 230 | The travel costs are associated to meeting, plenaries as well as participation to |
---|
[125] | 231 | conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 10 k\euro. The travel costs are estimated to |
---|
[123] | 232 | 5\% of the total requested ANR funding. |
---|
| 233 | \item[Expenses for inward billing] none |
---|
| 234 | \item[Other working costs] none |
---|
| 235 | \end{description} |
---|
| 236 | |
---|
[53] | 237 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
---|
[159] | 238 | % |
---|
| 239 | \begin{landscape} |
---|
| 240 | \begin{figure} |
---|
| 241 | \begin{small} |
---|
| 242 | \settowidth\desclen{XILINX RTL optimisation (5)} |
---|
| 243 | \def\resstablestyletitle#1{\parbox{\desclen}{\textit{#1}}} |
---|
| 244 | \begin{minipage}[b]{.47\linewidth}\center |
---|
| 245 | \input{table_inria_cairn_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex}\\ \irisa \vspace{2.5ex}\\ |
---|
[278] | 246 | \input{table_mds_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex}\\ \mds \\ |
---|
[159] | 247 | \end{minipage}\hfill\begin{minipage}[b]{.47\linewidth}\center |
---|
| 248 | \input{table_tima_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex} \\ \tima |
---|
| 249 | \end{minipage} |
---|
| 250 | \end{small} |
---|
[162] | 251 | \caption{\label{table-livrables-1} Man power in \hommemois for the deliverables (1)} |
---|
[159] | 252 | \end{figure} |
---|
| 253 | % |
---|
| 254 | \begin{figure} |
---|
| 255 | \begin{small} |
---|
| 256 | \settowidth\desclen{XILINX RTL optimisation (5)} |
---|
| 257 | \def\resstablestyletitle#1{\parbox{\desclen}{\textit{#1}}} |
---|
| 258 | \begin{minipage}[b]{.47\linewidth}\center |
---|
| 259 | \input{table_ubs_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex}\\ \ubs \vspace{2.5ex}\\ |
---|
[164] | 260 | %\input{table_thales_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex}\\ \thales \\ |
---|
[159] | 261 | \end{minipage}\hfill\begin{minipage}[b]{.47\linewidth}\center |
---|
| 262 | \input{table_upmc_full.tex}\vspace{.5ex} \\ \upmc |
---|
| 263 | \end{minipage} |
---|
| 264 | \end{small} |
---|
[162] | 265 | \caption{\label{table-livrables-2} Man power in \hommemois for the deliverables (2)} |
---|
[159] | 266 | \end{figure} |
---|
| 267 | \end{landscape} |
---|