source: anr/section-7.tex @ 155

Last change on this file since 155 was 155, checked in by coach, 14 years ago

INRIA/COMPSYS -> LIP

File size: 12.0 KB
RevLine 
[123]1\def\resstablestyletitle#1{\begin{small}{\textit{#1}}\end{small}}
[53]2
3%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
[121]4\subsection{Partner 1: \irisa}
[53]5
[121]6\begin{figure}\leavevmode\center
7\input{table_inria_cairn_full.tex}
[155]8\caption{\label{ress-detail-irisa}Man power in $mm$ for the deliverables of \irisa.}
[121]9\end{figure}
10\begin{description}
11\item [Equipment]
12No specific equipment acquisition.
13\item [Personnel costs] The faculty members involved in the project
14  are François Charot (INRIA researcher) Steven Derrien (associate
15  professor) and Charles Wagner (research engineer). The non-permanent
16  personal required is a PhD student that will mainly work on ASIP
[131]17  generation. We are looking for a profile with strong informatic skills
[121]18  and good knowledge in computer architecture.
[120]19
[152]20The table below summarizes the manpower by tasks for both permanent and non-permanent
[155]21personnels. The detail by deliverables is given in figure~\ref{ress-detail-irisa}.
[152]22The non-permanent personnels costs represent \mustbecompleted{??\%} of the personnal
[121]23costs. The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 100\% of
24the total ANR requested funding.
25    \begin{center}\input{table_inria_cairn_short.tex}\end{center}
[120]26
[121]27\item [Subcontracting]
28No subcontracting costs.
29\item [Travel]
30The travel costs are associated to project meeting as
31well as participation to conferences. The travel costs are estimated
[152]32to \mustbecompleted{??\%} of the total requested ANR funding.
[121]33\item [Expenses for inward billing]
34The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\%
35of the total requested ANR funding.\\
36\end{description}
37
38
39\subsection{Partner 2: \lip}
40
[87]41\begin{description}
42\item [Equipment]
43No specific equipment acquisition.
44\item [Personnel costs]
[155]45The faculty members involved in the project are an emeritus professor at ENS
[87]46Lyon (Paul Feautrier) and a research associate (CR2) at INRIA
47Rh\^one-Alpes (Christophe Alias). The non-permanent personal required
48is a PhD student that will work on network process generation from
49polyhedral loops, then on extensions to non-polyhedral loops. We are
50looking for a student with both theoretical and practical skills, that
51will be able to get a sufficient understanding of the polyhedral
52techniques and to produce a working implementation.
[53]53
[155]54The table below summarizes the man power by deliverables and tasks for both permanent and
[152]55non-permanent personnels.
56The non-permanent personnels costs represent \mustbecompleted{??\%} of the personnal
[87]57costs. The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 100\% of
58the total ANR requested funding.
[152]59    \begin{center}\input{table_inria_compsys_full.tex}\end{center}
[87]60
61\item [Subcontracting]
62No subcontracting costs.
63\item [Travel]
64The travel costs are associated to project meeting as
65well as participation to conferences. The travel costs are estimated
[152]66to \mustbecompleted{??\%} of the total requested ANR funding.
[87]67\item [Expenses for inward billing]
68The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\%
69of the total requested ANR funding.\\
70\end{description}
71
72
[53]73%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
[121]74\subsection{Partner 3: \tima}
[63]75\begin{figure}\leavevmode\center
76\input{table_tima_full.tex}
[155]77\caption{\label{ress-detail-tima}Man power in $mm$ for the deliverables of \tima.}
[63]78\end{figure}
79\begin{description}
[57]80\item [Equipment]
81No specific equipment acquisition.
82\item [Personnel costs]
83The permanent personnels involved in the project are professor and
[131]84assistant professor (Fr\'ed\'eric P\'etrot and Olivier Muller).
[130]85The non permanent personnels are Phd students and post-doc researchers.
[57]86Related costs are estimated in men per months.
[131]87One phd student (Adrien Prost-Boucle), funded by the
88french ministry of research,
[119]89will be working on the project.
[130]90One 100\% funded phd student will be hired in september 2010. A post-doc researcher
[131]91will be hired at the end of 2011 for one year and an half.
[130]92The PhD student will mainly work on the evolution of UGH HLS tool. Thus, we
[119]93are looking for a profile with strong informatic skills and good knowledge in
[57]94computer architecture.
[130]95The post-doc will mainly work on dynamic reconfiguration and HPC. The required
[131]96profile will be more oriented on computer architecture and advanced digital design.
[53]97
[57]98The table below sumarizes the man power by task for both permanent and non-permanent
[155]99personnels. The detail by deliverables is given in figure~\ref{ress-detail-tima}.
[130]100The requested funding for personnels represent 50\% of the total personnal costs.
101The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 85\% of the total ANR
[57]102requested funding.
[99]103\begin{center}\input{table_tima_short.tex}\end{center}
[57]104\item [Subcontracting]
105No subcontracting costs.
106\item [Travel]
107The travel costs are associated to project meeting as
108well as participation to conferences. The travel costs are estimated
[130]109to 11\% of the total requested ANR funding.
[57]110\item [Expenses for inward billing]
111The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\%
112of the total requested ANR funding.\\
[63]113\end{description}
[57]114
[53]115%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
[121]116\subsection{Partner 4: \ubs}
[99]117\begin{figure}\leavevmode\center
118\input{table_ubs_full.tex}
[155]119\caption{\label{ress-detail-ubs}Man power in $mm$ for the deliverables of \ubs.}
[99]120\end{figure}
[53]121
[70]122\begin {description}
123\item [Equipment]
124In order to validate the design flow project, the LabSTICC  laboratory will buy FPGA developpement boards.
125The cost for these FPGA boards is estimated to 3\% of the total ANR funding.
126\item [Personnel costs]
127The faculty members involved in the project are
[119]128associate professors (Philippe COUSSY, Cyrille CHAVET) or research engineers (Dominique HELLER).
[70]129All non-permanent personnel costs are estimated in men*months
130for senior researchers (post-doc or research engineers).
[99]131
[70]132The table below sumarizes the man power by task for both permanent and non-permanent
[155]133personnels. The detail by deliverables is given in figure~\ref {ress-detail-ubs}.
[70]134The non-permanent personnels costs represent 50\% of the personnal costs.
135The requested funding for non permanent personnels is about 83\% of the total ANR
136requested funding.
[99]137\begin{center}\input{table_ubs_short.tex}\end{center}
[70]138\item [Subcontracting]
139No subcontracting costs.
140\item [Travel]
141The travel costs are associated to management and meeting as
142well as participation to conferences. The travel costs are estimated
143to 10\% of the total requested ANR funding.
144\item [Expenses for inward billing]
145The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\%
146of the total requested ANR funding.
147\end {description}
148
149
[53]150%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
[121]151\subsection{Partner 5: \upmc}
[58]152\begin{figure}\leavevmode\center
153\input{table_upmc_full.tex}
[155]154\caption{\label{ress-detail-upmc}Man power in $mm$ for the deliverables of \upmc.}
[58]155\end{figure}
156\begin{description}
157\item[Equipment]
158    No specific equipment acquisition is required for this project.
159    The costs for depreciation of workstations
160    and pre-existing FPGA boards are evaluated to 7\% of the total
161    requested ANR funding.
162\item[Personnel costs]
163    The permanent personnels involved in the project are professors or
164    assistant processors (Alain Greiner and Ivan Aug\'e).
165    All non permanent personnel costs are estimated in men*months
166    for senior researchers (post-doc or research engineers).
167    The table below sumarizes the man power by task for both permanent  and non-permanent
[155]168    personnels. The detail by deliverables is given in figure~\ref{ress-detail-upmc}.
[58]169    The non-permanent personnels costs represent 50\% of the personnal costs.
170    The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 79\% of the total ANR
171    requested funding.
172    \begin{center}\input{table_upmc_short.tex}\end{center}
173\item[Subcontracting]
174    No subcontracting costs.
175\item[Travel]
176    The travel costs are associated to management and coordination meeting as
177    well as participation to conferences. The travel costs are estimated
178    to 10\% of the total requested ANR funding.
179\item[Expenses for inward billing]
180    The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\%
181    of the total requested ANR funding.
182\end{description}
[53]183
184%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
[121]185\subsection{Partner 6: \xilinx}
[114]186
[99]187\begin{figure}\leavevmode\center
188\input{table_xilinx_full.tex}
[155]189\caption{\label{ress-detail-xilinx}Man power in $mm$ for the deliverables of \xilinx.}
[99]190\end{figure}
191\begin{description}
192\item[Equipment]
193    No specific equipment acquisition is required for this project.
194\item[Personnel costs]
195    \xilinx employees involved in the project are permanent Software Engineers.
[155]196    The detail by deliverables is given in figure~\ref{ress-detail-xilinx} and
[114]197    a sumary by task in the following table.
[99]198    \begin{center}\input{table_xilinx_short.tex}\end{center}
199\item[Subcontracting]
200    No subcontracting costs.
201\item[Travel]
202    The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as participation to
203    conferences. The travel costs are estimated to
[143]204    2\% of the total requested ANR funding.
[99]205\item[Expenses for inward billing] none
206\item[Other working costs] none
207\end{description}
[53]208
209%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
[121]210\subsection{Partner 7: \bull}
[53]211
[114]212\begin{description}
213\item[Equipment]
214    Acquisition of a FPGA development board will represent the main equipment cost for
215    Bull in COACH. It is estimated at about 5\% (tbc) of the total funding.
216\item[Personnel costs]
217    A permanent engineer will be assigned full time to the project for a duration of 20
218    months as shown in the table below:
[126]219    \begin{center}\input{table_bull_full.tex}\end{center}
[114]220\item[Subcontracting]
221    No subcontracting costs.
222\item[Travel]
223    Application of a standard 10\% of the total funding to travel costs.
224\item[Expenses for inward billing]
225    Costs justified by inward billing are estimated to about 5\% of the total funding.
226\item[Other working costs] none
227\end{description}
228
229
[53]230%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
[121]231\subsection{Partner 8: \thales}
[53]232
[123]233\begin{description}
234\item[Equipment]
235    In order to validate the design flow,TRT will buy FPGA developpement boards. The cost
[125]236    for these FPGA boards is estimated to 20 k\euro (6\% of the total ANR funding).
[123]237\item[Personnel costs]
[131]238    The effort to adapt SPEAR DE to generate the input files to COACH framework is
[126]239    estimated to 13 man.months.
240    The effort to describe and develop the application is estimated to 14 man.month.
[131]241    Finally we need one man.month for the partiticipation to the global specification in task 2.
[123]242    \begin{center}\input{table_thales_full.tex}\end{center}
243\item[Subcontracting]
244    No subcontracting costs.
245\item[Travel]
246    The travel costs are associated to meeting, plenaries as well as participation to
[125]247    conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 10 k\euro. The travel costs are estimated to
[123]248    5\% of the total requested ANR funding.
249\item[Expenses for inward billing] none
250\item[Other working costs] none
251\end{description}
252
[53]253%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
[121]254\subsection{Partner 9: \zied}
[53]255
[123]256  \begin{center}\input{table_zied_full.tex}\end{center}
257
[53]258%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
[121]259\subsection{Partner 10: \navtel}
[53]260
[125]261\begin{description}
262\item[Equipment]
263    Navtel will use FPGA board with ARM processors for the validation.
[131]264    The costs for depreciation of the board and the instrument of test
[125]265    are evaluated to 7\% of the total requested ANR funding.
266\item[Personnel costs]
[131]267    A permanent engineer will be assigned on average 1/3 time for
268        all the duration of the project.
[155]269    The table below shows the estimated manpower cost in months for the deliverables.
[125]270    \begin{center}\input{table_navtel_full.tex}\end{center}
271\item[Subcontracting]
272    No subcontracting costs.
273\item[Travel]
274    The travel costs are associated to meeting, plenaries as well as participation to
275    conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 3 k\euro.
276\item[Expenses for inward billing] none
277\item[Other working costs] none
278\end{description}
Note: See TracBrowser for help on using the repository browser.