- Timestamp:
- Feb 8, 2010, 12:11:05 AM (15 years ago)
- Location:
- anr
- Files:
-
- 12 edited
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
-
anr/Makefile
r91 r99 15 15 table_tima_full.tex table_tima_short.tex \ 16 16 table_lip_full.tex table_lip_short.tex \ 17 table_ubs_full.tex table_ubs_short.tex \ 18 table_xilinx_full.tex table_xilinx_short.tex \ 17 19 18 20 # PROGRAMS -
anr/anr.tex
r97 r99 1 \documentclass[1 2pt,a4paper]{article}1 \documentclass[11pt,a4paper]{article} 2 2 3 3 \usepackage[french]{babel} … … 14 14 \usepackage{geometry} 15 15 \usepackage{textcomp} 16 \geometry{verbose,a4paper,tmargin=3cm,bmargin=2cm,lmargin=2cm,rmargin= 3cm}16 \geometry{verbose,a4paper,tmargin=3cm,bmargin=2cm,lmargin=2cm,rmargin=2cm} 17 17 18 18 \usepackage{anr} … … 31 31 \definecolor{rouge}{rgb}{1.0,0.2,0.2} 32 32 \def\mustbecompleted#1{} 33 \def\parlf{\vspace*{1.0ex}\par} 33 34 34 35 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 35 36 \def\Sformat#1{\begin{small}\textsc{#1}\end{small}} 36 37 \def\irisa{IRISA\xspace} \def\Sirisa{\Sformat{IRI}\xspace} 37 \def\citi{CITI\xspace} \def\Sciti{\Sformat{CITI}\xspace}38 %\def\citi{CITI\xspace} \def\Sciti{\Sformat{CITI}\xspace} 38 39 \def\lip{LIP\xspace} \def\Slip{\Sformat{LIP}\xspace} 39 40 \def\tima{TIMA\xspace} \def\Stima{\Sformat{TIMA}\xspace} 40 \def\ubs{ UBS\xspace}\def\Subs{\Sformat{UBS}\xspace}41 \def\ubs{LAB-STICC\xspace} \def\Subs{\Sformat{UBS}\xspace} 41 42 \def\upmc{LIP6\xspace} \def\Supmc{\Sformat{LIP6}\xspace} 42 43 \def\altera{ALTERA\xspace} \def\Saltera{\Sformat{ALTE}\xspace} … … 62 63 \def\anrdoc#1{\noindent\begin{scriptsize}\textcolor{red}{#1}\end{scriptsize}\ifhmode\par\fi} 63 64 % Comment the next macro to suppress the pagefeed 64 \let\pagefeed\newpage65 %\let\pagefeed\newpage 65 66 % Comment the next macro to suppress it 66 \def\mustbecompleted#1{\textcolor{ gris}{#1}}67 \def\mustbecompleted#1{\textcolor{red}{#1}} 67 68 % FIN CONFIG 68 69 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% … … 191 192 % 4.3 192 193 \pagefeed\subsection{Description of the tasks} 194 \label{task-description} 193 195 \anrdoc{(idéalement 1 ou 2 pages par tâche) 194 196 Pour chaque tâche, décrire:\begin{itemize} … … 226 228 227 229 \subsubsection{Task 8: \textit{Dissemination}} 230 \label{task-7} 228 231 \input{task-7} 229 232 -
anr/dependence-task-h.fig
r78 r99 14 14 0 0 1.00 60.00 120.00 15 15 -681 690 -231 1275 16 2 1 0 3 0 7 90 -1 -1 0.000 0 0 -1 1 0 217 0 0 1.00 60.00 120.0018 -2070 1350 -1620 135019 2 1 0 3 0 7 100 -1 -1 0.000 0 0 -1 1 0 1020 0 0 1.00 60.00 120.0021 405 1350 450 1350 540 1350 585 1350 630 1350 675 135022 720 1350 765 1350 810 1350 855 135023 16 2 2 1 1 0 7 80 -1 -1 4.000 0 0 -1 0 0 5 24 17 -1665 2475 1800 2475 1800 225 -1665 225 -1665 2475 … … 50 43 2 2 0 1 0 7 80 -1 -1 0.000 0 0 -1 0 0 5 51 44 -2700 1125 -2070 1125 -2070 1575 -2700 1575 -2700 1125 45 2 1 0 4 0 7 90 -1 -1 0.000 0 0 -1 1 0 2 46 0 0 1.00 60.00 120.00 47 -2070 1350 -1620 1350 48 2 1 0 4 0 7 100 -1 -1 0.000 0 0 -1 1 0 10 49 0 0 1.00 60.00 120.00 50 405 1350 450 1350 540 1350 585 1350 630 1350 675 1350 51 720 1350 765 1350 810 1350 855 1350 52 52 4 0 0 70 -1 18 16 0.0000 4 195 315 3330 90 T1\001 53 53 4 1 0 90 -1 18 16 0.0000 4 195 315 2925 945 T7\001 -
anr/section-1.tex
r97 r99 4 4 integration of heterogeneous technologies and requires the design of 5 5 complex Multi-Processors System on Chip (MPSoC). 6 \ par6 \\ 7 7 During the last decade, the design of ASICs (Application Specific 8 8 Integrated Circuits) appeared to be more and more reserved to high volume markets, because … … 20 20 major companies to design innovative devices and to enter new, low and 21 21 medium volume markets. 22 \par 22 \parlf 23 23 The objective of COACH is to provide an integrated design flow, based on the 24 24 SoCLib infrastructure~\cite{soclib}, and optimized for the design of … … 31 31 They can also be extension boards connected to a PC to accelerate a specific computation, 32 32 as in High-Performance Computing (HPC) or High-Speed Signal Processing (HSSP). 33 \par 33 \parlf 34 34 %verrous scientifiques et techniques 35 \vspace*{.9ex}\par36 35 The COACH environment will integrate several hardware and software technologies: 37 36 \begin{description} … … 66 65 \item An \altera architectural template based on the \altera IP core library and the 67 66 AVALON system bus. 68 \item A \xilinx architectural template based on the Xlinx IP core library and the OPB67 \item A \xilinx architectural template based on the Xlinx IP core library and the PLB 69 68 system bus. 70 69 \end{enumerate} … … 82 81 %independant from both the architectural template and from the selected FPGA 83 82 %family. 84 83 \parlf 85 84 % le programme de travail 86 \vspace*{.9ex}\par87 85 %The COACH project targets fundamental issues related to design methodologies for 88 86 %digital systems by providing estimation, exploration and design tools targeting both … … 106 104 Finally it will use the \xilinx and \altera RTL tools to generate the FPGA configuration 107 105 bitstreams. 108 \par 106 \parlf 109 107 The COACH proposal has been prepared during one year by a technical working group 110 108 involving the 5 academic partners (one monthly meeting from january 2009 to february … … 115 113 Because the SocLib platform is the base of this project, it may be described as an 116 114 extension of the SoCLib platform. 117 118 115 %The main development steps of the COACH project are: 119 116 %\begin{enumerate} … … 135 132 % dynamic reconfiguration of FPGA devices. 136 133 %\end{enumerate} 137 138 \par 134 \parlf 139 135 Two major FPGA companies are involved in the project : \xilinx will contribute 140 136 as a contractual partner providing documentation and manpower; \altera will contribute as a supporter, 141 providing documentation and development boards (\altera). These two companies are strongly motivated137 providing documentation and development boards. These two companies are strongly motivated 142 138 to help the COACH project to generate efficient bitsream for both FPGA families. 143 139 The role of the industrial partners \bull, \thales, \navtel and \zied is to provide 144 140 real use cases to benchmark the COACH design environment. 145 \par 141 \parlf 146 142 Following the general policy of the SoCLib platform, the COACH project will be an open 147 143 infrastructure, available in the framework of the SoCLib server. -
anr/section-2.1.tex
r97 r99 1 \begin{table}\leavevmode\center 2 \begin{small}\begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|}\hline 3 Segment & 2010 & 2011 & 2012 \\\hline\hline 4 Communications & 1,867 & 1,946 & 2,096 \\ 5 High end & 467 & 511 & 550 \\\hline 6 Consumer & 550 & 592 & 672 \\ 7 High end & 53 & 62 & 75 \\\hline 8 Automotive & 243 & 286 & 358 \\ 9 High end & - & - & - \\\hline 10 Industrial & 1,102 & 1,228 & 1,406 \\ 11 High end & 177 & 188 & 207 \\\hline 12 Military/Aereo & 566 & 636 & 717 \\ 13 High end & 56 & 65 & 82 \\\hline\hline 14 Total FPGA/PLD & 4,659 & 5,015 & 5,583 \\ 15 Total High-End FPGA & 753 & 826 & 914 \\\hline 16 \end{tabular}\end{small} 17 \caption{\label{fpga_market} Gartner estimation of worldwide FPGA/PLD consumption (Millions \$)} 18 \end{table} 19 % 1 20 Microelectronic components allow the integration of complicated functions into products, increases 2 21 commercial attractivity of these products and improves their competitivity. 3 22 Multimedia and tele-communication sectors have taken advantage from microelectronics facilities 4 23 thanks to the developpment of design methodologies and tools for embedded systems. 5 \par6 24 Unfortunately, the Non Recurring Engineering (NRE) costs involded in designing 7 25 and manufacturing ASICs is very high. … … 11 29 Consequently, it is generally unfeasible to design and fabricate ASICs for low and medium 12 30 volume markets. 13 \par 31 \parlf 14 32 Today, FPGAs become important actors in the computational domain that was originally dominated 15 33 by microprocessors and ASICs. Just like microprocessors, FPGA based systems can be reprogrammed … … 20 38 choice for low-to-medium volume applications. 21 39 Since their introduction in the mid eighties, FPGAs evolved from a simple, 22 low-capacity gate array to devices ( Altera STRATIX III, Xilinx Virtex V) that40 low-capacity gate array to devices (\altera STRATIX III, Xilinx Virtex V) that 23 41 provide a mix of coarse-grained data path units, memory blocks, microprocessor cores, 24 42 on chip A/D conversion, and gate counts by millions. This high logic capacity allows to implement 25 43 complex systems like multi-processors platform with application dedicated coprocessors. 26 44 Table~\ref{fpga_market} shows the estimation of FPGA worldwide market in the next years in 27 various application domains. 45 various application domains. The ``high end'' lines concern only FPGA with high logic 46 capacity for complex system implementations. 28 47 This market is in significant expansion and is estimated to 914\,M\$ in 2012. 29 30 \begin{table}\leavevmode\center 31 \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|}\hline 32 Segment & 2010 & 2011 & 2012 \\\hline\hline 33 Communications & 1,867 & 1,946 & 2,096 \\ 34 High end & 467 & 511 & 550 \\\hline 35 Consumer & 550 & 592 & 672 \\ 36 High end & 53 & 62 & 75 \\\hline 37 Automotive & 243 & 286 & 358 \\ 38 High end & - & - & - \\\hline 39 Industrial & 1,102 & 1,228 & 1,406 \\ 40 High end & 177 & 188 & 207 \\\hline 41 Military/Aereo & 566 & 636 & 717 \\ 42 High end & 56 & 65 & 82 \\\hline\hline 43 Total FPGA/PLD & 4,659 & 5,015 & 5,583 \\ 44 Total High-End FPGA & 753 & 826 & 914 \\\hline 45 \end{tabular} 46 \caption{\label{fpga_market} Gartner estimation of worldwide FPGA/PLD consumption (Millions \$)} 47 \end{table} 48 \par 49 50 This market is dominated by Multi-core CPUs and GPUs based solutions and the expansion of FPGA-based solutions 51 is limited by the lack of design flow automation. Nowadays, there are neither commercial 52 nor academic tools covering the whole design process from the system level specification to the bit stream 53 generation. 54 %For instance, with SOPC Builder from Altera, users can select and parameterize IP components 55 %from an extensive drop-down list of communication, digital signal processor (DSP), microprocessor 56 %and bus interface cores, as well as incorporate their own IP. Designers can then generate 57 %a synthesized netlist, simulation test bench and custom software library that reflect the hardware 58 %configuration. 59 %Nevertheless, SOPC Builder does not provide any facilities to synthesize coprocessors\emph{I 60 (%Steven) disagree : the C2H compiler bundled with SOPCBuilder does a pretty good job at this} and to 61 %simulate the platform at a high design level (systemC). 62 %In addition, SOPC Builder is proprietary and only works together with Altera's Quartus compilation 63 %tool to implement designs on Altera devices (Stratix, Arria, Cyclone). 64 %PICO [CITATION] and CATAPULT [CITATION] allow to synthesize coprocessors from a C++ description. 65 %Nevertheless, they can only deal with data dominated applications and they do not handle the platform level. 66 %The Xilinx System Generator for DSP [http://www.xilinx.com/tools/sysgen.htm] is a plug-in to 67 %Simulink that enables designers to develop high-performance DSP systems for Xilinx FPGAs. 68 %Designers can design and simulate a system using MATLAB and Simulink. The tool will then 69 %automatically generate synthesizable Hardware Description Language (HDL) code mapped to Xilinx 70 %pre-optimized algorithms. 71 %However, this tool targets only DSP based algorithms. 72 73 Consequently, a designer developping an embedded system needs to master 74 four different design environment : a virtual prototyping environment such as SoCLib for system level exploration, 75 an architecture compiler (such as SOPC Builder from Altera, or System generator from Xilinx) to define the 76 hardware architecture, one or several HLS tools (such as PICO [CITATION] ou CATAPULT [CITATION]) for 77 coprocessor synthesis, and finally a backend synthesis tool (such as Quartus or YYYY) for the bit-stream generation. 78 48 The HPC market size is estimated today by FPGA providers at 214\,M\$. 49 Using FPGA limits the NRE costs to the design cost. 50 This boosts the developpment of automatic design tools and methodologies. 51 % 52 %Today, several companies (atipa, blue-arc, Bull, Chelsio, Convey, CRAY, DataDirect, DELL, hp, 53 %Wild Systems, IBM, Intel, Microsoft, Myricom, NEC, nvidia etc) are making systems where demand 54 %for very high performance (HPC) primes over other requirements. They tend to use the highest 55 %performing devices like Multi-core CPUs, GPUs, large FPGAs, custom ICs and the most innovative 56 %architectures and algorithms. These companies show up in different "traditional" applications and market 57 %segments like computing clusters (ad-hoc), servers and storage, networking and Telecom, ASIC 58 %emulation and prototyping, military/aereo etc. The HPC market size is estimated today by FPGA providers 59 %at 214\,M\$. 60 %%% 61 \parlf 62 This market is dominated by Multi-core CPUs and GPUs based solutions and the expansion 63 of FPGA-based solutions is limited by the lack of design flow automation. 64 Nowadays, there are neither commercial nor academic tools covering the whole design process 65 from the system level specification to the bit stream generation. 66 \\ 67 % IA to Alain: J'ai remis (et ameliore un peu) ca car sinon le Consequently 20 lignes 68 % au dessous n'a pas de sens. 69 % Deplus dans les demandes ANR de la section, il est demande: analyse de la concurrence 70 For instance, with SOPC Builder~\cite{spoc-builder} from \altera, designers can select and 71 parameterize components from an extensive drop-down list of IP cores (I/O core, DSP, 72 processor, bus core, ...) as well as incorporate their own IP. 73 Designers can then generate a synthesized netlist, simulation test bench and custom 74 software library that reflect the hardware configuration. 75 %% Steven disagree : the C2H compiler bundled with SOPCBuilder does a pretty good job at this. 76 %% IA: ces lignes ont ete verifiees et corrigée pa altera. De plus C2H est plutot limite. 77 Nevertheless, SOPC Builder does not provide any facilities to synthesize coprocessors and to 78 simulate the platform at a high design level (systemC). 79 In addition, SOPC Builder is proprietary and only works together with \altera's Quartus compilation 80 tool to implement designs on \altera devices (Stratix, Arria, Cyclone). 81 \\ 82 For instance, PICO~\cite{pico} and CATAPULT-C~\cite{catapult-c} allow to synthesize 83 coprocessors from a C++ description. 84 Nevertheless, they can only deal with data dominated applications and they do not handle 85 the platform level. 86 \\ 87 Similarly, the System Generator for DSP~\cite{system-generateur-for-dsp} is a plug-in to 88 Simulink that enables designers to develop high-performance DSP systems for \xilinx FPGAs. 89 Designers can design and simulate a system using MATLAB and Simulink. The tool will then 90 automatically generate synthesizable Hardware Description Language (HDL) code mapped to 91 \xilinx pre-optimized macro-cells. 92 However, this tool targets only DSP based algorithms. 93 \\ 94 Consequently, a designer developping an embedded system needs to master four different 95 design environments: 96 \begin{enumerate} 97 \item a virtual prototyping environment such as SoCLib for system level exploration, 98 \item an architecture compiler (such as SOPC Builder from \altera, or System generator from Xilinx) 99 to define the hardware architecture, 100 \item one or several HLS tools (such as PICO~\cite{pico} or CATAPULT-C~\cite{catapult-c}) for 101 coprocessor synthesis, 102 \item and finally backend synthesis tools (such as Quartus or Synopsys) for the bit-stream generation. 103 \end{enumerate} 104 Furthermore, mixing these tools requires an important interfacing effort and this makes 105 the design process very complex and achievable only by designers skilled in many domains. 106 \begin{center}\begin{minipage}{.8\linewidth}\textit{ 79 107 The aim of the COACH project is to integrate all these design steps into a single design framework. 80 108 and to allow \textbf{pure software} developpers to develop embedded systems. 81 \par 82 We believe that the combination of a design environment dedicated to software developpers and the FPGA target, 109 }\end{minipage}\end{center} 110 \parlf 111 We believe that the combination of a design environment dedicated to software developpers 112 and the FPGA target, 83 113 allows small and even very small companies to propose embedded system and accelerating solutions 84 114 for standard software applications with acceptable prices. 85 86 115 This new market may explode in the same way as the micro-computer market in the eighties, 87 116 whose success was due to the low cost of the first micro-processors (compared to main frames) 88 117 and the advent of high level programming languages which allowed a high number of programmers 89 118 to launch start-ups in software engineering. 90 -
anr/section-2.2.tex
r97 r99 9 9 This project proposes an open-source framework for mapping multi-tasks software applications 10 10 on Field Programmable Gate Array circuits (FPGA). 11 12 \par 11 %%% 12 \parlf 13 13 COACH will contribute to build an open development and run-time 14 14 environment, including communication middleware and tools to support 15 15 developers in the production of embedded software, through all phases of the software lifecycle, 16 16 from requirements analysis until deployment and maintenance. 17 18 17 More specifically, COACH focuses on: 19 18 \begin{itemize} … … 26 25 environment, suitable for co-operative and distributed development. 27 26 \end{itemize} 28 27 %%% 28 \parlf 29 29 COACH outcome will contribute to strengthen Europe's competitive position by developing 30 30 technologies and methodologies for product development, focusing (in compliance with the … … 33 33 in COACH will enable new and emerging information technologies for the development, 34 34 manufacturing and integration of devices and related software into end-products. 35 36 \par 35 %%% 36 \parlf 37 37 The COACH project will benefit from a number of previous projects: 38 \begin{itemize} 39 \item SOCLIB : 40 The SoCLib ANR platform (2007-2009) is an open infrastructure developped by 10 academic laboratories 41 and 6 industrial companies. 42 It supports system level virtual prototyping of shared memory, multi-processors 43 architectures, and provides tools to map multi-tasks software application on these 44 architectures, for reliable performance evaluation. 45 The core of this platform is a library of SystemC simulation models for 46 general purpose IP cores such as processors, buses, networks, memories, IO controller. 47 The platform provides also embedded operating systems and software/hardware 48 communication middleware. 49 The synthesisable VHDL models of IPs are not part of the SoCLib platform, and 50 this project enhances SoCLib by providing the synthesisable VHDL models required 51 for FPGA synthesis. 52 \item ROMA : 53 The ROMA ANR project (2007-2009) involving IRISA, LIRMM, CEA List THOMSON France R\&D, proposes to develop a 54 reconfigurable processor, exhibiting high silicon density and power efficiency, able to adapt its 55 computing structure to computation patterns that can be speed-up and/or power efficient. 56 The ROMA project study a pipeline-based of evolved low-power coarse grain reconfigurable 57 operators to avoid traditional overhead, in reconfigurable devices, related to 58 the interconnection network. 59 The project will borrow from the ROMA ANR xxproject (2007-2009) and the ongoing 60 joint INRIA-STMicro Nano2012 project to adapt existing pattern 61 extraction algorithms and datapath merging techniques to the synthesis of customized 62 ASIP processors. 63 \item TSAR : 64 The TSAR MEDEA+ project (2008-2010) involving BULL, THALES and the LIP6 targets the design of a 65 scalable, coherent shared memory, multi-cores processor architecture, and uses the SoCLib 66 plaform for virtual prototyping. The COACH project will benefit from the synthesizable VHDL 67 models developped in the framework of TSAR (MIPS32 processor core, and RING interconnect). 68 \item BioWic 69 On the HPC application side, we also hope to benefit from the experience in 70 hardware acceleration of bioinformatic algorithms/workfows gathered by the 71 CAIRN group in the context of the ANR BioWic project (2009-2011), so as to 72 be able to validate the framework on real-life HPC applications. 73 \end{itemize} 74 75 76 \par 38 \begin{description} 39 \item[SOCLIB] 40 The SoCLib ANR platform (2007-2009) is an open infrastructure developped by 10 academic laboratories 41 and 6 industrial companies. 42 It supports system level virtual prototyping of shared memory, multi-processors 43 architectures, and provides tools to map multi-tasks software application on these 44 architectures, for reliable performance evaluation. 45 The core of this platform is a library of SystemC simulation models for 46 general purpose IP cores such as processors, buses, networks, memories, IO controller. 47 The platform provides also embedded operating systems and software/hardware 48 communication middleware. 49 The synthesisable VHDL models of IPs are not part of the SoCLib platform, and 50 this project enhances SoCLib by providing the synthesisable VHDL models required 51 for FPGA synthesis. 52 \item[ROMA] 53 The ROMA ANR project (2007-2009) involving IRISA, LIRMM, CEA List THOMSON France R\&D, proposes to develop a 54 reconfigurable processor, exhibiting high silicon density and power efficiency, able to adapt its 55 computing structure to computation patterns that can be speed-up and/or power efficient. 56 The ROMA project study a pipeline-based of evolved low-power coarse grain reconfigurable 57 operators to avoid traditional overhead, in reconfigurable devices, related to 58 the interconnection network. 59 The project will borrow from the ROMA ANR xxproject (2007-2009) and the ongoing 60 joint INRIA-STMicro Nano2012 project to adapt existing pattern 61 extraction algorithms and datapath merging techniques to the synthesis of customized 62 ASIP processors. 63 \item[TSAR] 64 The TSAR MEDEA+ project (2008-2010) involving BULL, THALES and the \upmc targets the design of a 65 scalable, coherent shared memory, multi-cores processor architecture, and uses the SoCLib 66 plaform for virtual prototyping. The COACH project will benefit from the synthesizable VHDL 67 models developped in the framework of TSAR (MIPS32 processor core, and RING interconnect). 68 \item[BioWic] 69 On the HPC application side, we also hope to benefit from the experience in 70 hardware acceleration of bioinformatic algorithms/workfows gathered by the 71 CAIRN group in the context of the ANR BioWic project (2009-2011), so as to 72 be able to validate the framework on real-life HPC applications. 73 \end{description} 74 %%% 75 \parlf 77 76 The laboratories involved in the COACH project have a well estabished expertise 78 77 in the following domains: 79 78 \begin{itemize} 80 \item 81 In the field of High Level Synthesis (HLS), the project 82 leverages on know-how acquired over the last 15 years with the GAUT~\cite{gaut08} project 83 developped by the Lab-STIC laboratory, and with the UGH~\cite{ugh08} project developped 84 by the LIP6 and TIMA laboratories. 79 \item 80 In the field of High Level Synthesis (HLS), the project 81 leverages on know-how acquired over the last 15 years with the GAUT~\cite{gaut08} project 82 developped by the \ubs laboratory, and with the UGH~\cite{ugh08} project developped 83 by the \upmc and \tima laboratories. 84 \item 85 Regarding system level architecture, the project is based on the know-how 86 acquired by the \upmc and \tima laboratories in the framework of various projects 87 (COSY~\cite{disydent}, or MEDEA-MESA~\cite{dspin}), in the field of communication 88 architectures for shared memory multi-processors systems. 89 As an example, the DSPIN network on chip, is now used by BULL in the TSAR project. 90 \item 91 Regarding Application Specific Instruction Processor (ASIP) design, the 92 CAIRN group at INRIA Bretagne Atlantique benefits from several years of 93 expertise in the domain of retargetable compiler 94 (Armor/Calife~\cite{CODES99} since 1996, and the Gecos 95 compilers~\cite{ASAP05} since 2002). 85 96 \item 86 Regarding system level architecture, the project is based on the know-how 87 acquired by the LIP6 and TIMA laboratories in the framework of various projects 88 (COSY \cite{disydent}, or MEDEA MESA \cite{dspin}), in the field of communication 89 architectures for shared memory multi-processors systems. 90 As an example, the DSPIN network on chip, is now used by BULL in the TSAR project. 91 \item 92 Regarding Application Specific Instruction Processor (ASIP) design, the 93 CAIRN group at INRIA Bretagne Atlantique benefits from several years of 94 expertise in the domain of retargetable compiler 95 (Armor/Calife\cite{CODES99} since 1996, and the Gecos 96 compilers\cite{ASAP05} since 2002). 97 \item 98 In the field of compilers, the Compsys group was founded in 2002 99 by several senior researchers with experience in 100 high performance computing and automatic parallelization. They have been 101 among the initiators of the polyhedral model, a theory which serve to 102 unify many parallelism detection and exploitation techniques for regular 103 programs. It is expected that the techniques developped by Compsys for 104 parallelism detection, scheduling, process construction and memory management 105 will be very useful as a Rfront end for the a high-level synthesis tools. 97 In the field of compilers, the Compsys group was founded in 2002 98 by several senior researchers with experience in 99 high performance computing and automatic parallelization. They have been 100 among the initiators of the polyhedral model, a theory which serve to 101 unify many parallelism detection and exploitation techniques for regular 102 programs. It is expected that the techniques developped by Compsys for 103 parallelism detection, scheduling, process construction and memory management 104 will be very useful as a front-end for the a high-level synthesis tools. 106 105 \end{itemize} 107 108 109 \par 110 % FIXME A VERIFIER L'appel d'offre 106 %%% 107 \parlf 111 108 Finally, it is worth to note that this project cover priorities defined by the commission 112 109 experts in the field of Information Technolgies Society (IST) for Embedded … … 115 112 considering resources constraints (delais, power, memory, etc.), security and quality 116 113 services$>>$. 117 118 -
anr/section-2.tex
r97 r99 1 The first objective of COACH is to provide SMEs (Small and Medium Enterprises) an open-source framework to 2 design embedded system on FPGA devices. 3 1 Embedded systems (SoC and MPSoC) became an inevitable evolution in microelectronic industry. 4 2 Due to the exploding fabrication costs, the ASIC technology (Application Specific Integrated Circuit) 5 is not an option for most SMEs. Fortunately, the new FPGA (Field Programmable Gate Array) components,6 such as the Virtex5 family from Xilinx, or the Stratix4 family from Altera can implement a complete 7 multi-processor architecture on a single chip. 8 9 %But the design of a SoC (System on Chip) or MPSoC (Multi-Processor System on Chip) is a complex 10 %task, requiring adequate design methods to efficiently model, explore, and analyze the 11 %interactions between the software application and the hardware architectures. Moreover, most SMEs do not have 12 %in-home expertise in the field of hardware design or VHDL/Verilog modeling. 13 %In order to meet the increasing performance requirements, to decrease the development cost, and to 14 %shorten the time-to-market, they need new design methodologies. 15 3 is not an option for SMEs (Small and Medium Enterprises). 4 Fortunately, the new FPGA (Field Programmable Gate Array) components, 5 such as the Virtex5 family from \xilinx, or the Stratix4 family from \altera can implement a complete 6 multi-processor architecture on a single device. 7 But the design of embedded system is a long and complex task that requires expertise in software, 8 software/hardware partionning, operating system, hardware design, VHDL/Verilog modeling. 9 Only very few SMEs have these multiple expertises and are present on the embedded system market. 10 \begin{center}\begin{minipage}{.8\linewidth}\textit{ 11 The major objective of COACH is to provide to SMEs an open-source framework to design 12 embedded systems on FPGA devices. 13 }\end{minipage}\end{center} 16 14 %Current design methodologies provide quite low-level abstraction capabilities, and 17 15 %there is an urgent need to leverage system level exploration through the use of a high-level 18 16 %specification of the application and design space exploration tools. 19 20 17 %The first system oriented approaches are appearing, among which those 21 18 %based on C/C++ and SystemC are the most popular, but few of them are specifically targetting FPGAs. 22 19 %%% 20 \parlf 23 21 The COACH project will leverage on the expertise gained in the field of virtual prototyping 24 22 with the SoCLib platform, to propose a new design flow based on a small number of architectural templates. … … 29 27 template can be enriched by dedicated hardware coprocessors, obtained by high level synthesis (HLS) tools. 30 28 During this project, the COACH partners will develop three different architectural templates: 31 32 29 \begin{enumerate} 33 30 \item An \altera architectural template based on the \altera IP core library and the AVALON system bus. 34 \item A \xilinx architectural template based on the Xlinx IP core library and the OPB system bus. 35 \item A Neutral architectural template based on the SoCLib IP core library and the VCI/OCP communication infrastructure. 31 \item A \xilinx architectural template based on the \xilinx IP core library and the PLB system bus. 32 \item A Neutral architectural template based on the SoCLib IP core library and the VCI/OCP 33 communication infrastructure. 36 34 \end{enumerate} 37 38 35 The proposed design flow starts from a high level description of the application, specified as a set of 39 36 parallel tasks written in C, without any assumption on the hardware or software implementation 40 37 of these tasks. It let the system 41 designer in charge of exp essing the coarse grain parallelism of the application, gives the designer38 designer in charge of expressing the coarse grain parallelism of the application, gives the designer 42 39 the possibility to explore various mapping of the application on the selected template architecture, 43 40 and offers a high predictability of results with respect to cost and performance objectives. 44 41 \\ 45 42 When this interactive, system level, design space exploration is completed (converging to 46 43 a specific mapping on a specific version of the selected architectural template), the rest of the flow … … 48 45 code for the software running on the embedded processors, and the bit-stream to program the the target FPGA 49 46 will be automatically generated by the COACH tools. 50 51 \par 47 % 48 \parlf 52 49 The strength of the COACH approach is the strong integration of the high-level synthesis tools 53 50 in a plat-form based design flow supporting virtual prototyping and design space exploration. … … 60 57 %in Paris from january 2009 to february 2010, to analyse the issues of interfacing and integrating 61 58 %those various technologies, and to define the detailed architecture of the proposed design flow. 62 \par 63 59 %%% 60 \parlf 61 In HPC (High Performance Computing), the kind of targeted application is an existing one 62 running on a PC. 63 The COACH framework helps designer to accelerate it by migrating critical parts into a 64 SoC embedded into an FPGA device plugged to the PC PCI/X bus. 65 \begin{center}\begin{minipage}{.8\linewidth}\textit{ 66 The second objective of COACH is to extend the framework to HPC. 67 }\end{minipage}\end{center} 68 This will allow SMEs to enter HPC market for the applications that are 69 unadapted to the current GPU based solutions. 70 %%% 71 \parlf 64 72 In summary, the COACH project is clearly oriented toward industry, even if most technology building blocks 65 73 have been previously developed by academic laboratories. … … 98 106 %Every point of the design space can be implemented on any FPGA component, 99 107 %as long as it contains the hardware ressources required by the selected architectural template. 100 %Basically, COACH will support both Altera and Xilinx FPGA families.108 %Basically, COACH will support both \altera and \xilinx FPGA families. 101 109 %\end{itemize} 102 110 % -
anr/section-3.2.tex
r71 r99 18 18 and a mapping of processes on the platform components. The supported mapping are 19 19 software (the process runs on a SoC processor), 20 XXXpeci(the process runs on a SoC processor enhanced with dedicated instructions),21 and hardware (the process runs into a coprocessor generated by HLS and plugged on the SoC bus).20 ASIP (the process runs on a SoC processor enhanced with dedicated instructions), 21 and hardware (the process runs into a coprocessor that is generated by HLS and plugged on the SoC bus). 22 22 \item[Application compilation] Once the SoC description is validated, COACH generates automatically 23 23 an FPGA bitstream containing the hardware platform with the SoC application software and … … 76 76 %fin de projet. 77 77 The main result is the framework. It is composed concretely of: 78 2 HPC communication schemes with their implementation,79 5 H LS tools (control dominated HLS, data dominated HLS, Coarse grained HLS,78 a communication middleware for HPC, 79 5 HAS tools (control dominated HLS, data dominated HLS, Coarse grained HLS, 80 80 Memory optimisation HLS and ASIP), 81 3 systemC based virtual prototyping environment extended with synthesizable 82 RTL IP cores (generic, ALTERA/NIOS/AVALON, XILINX/MICROBLAZE/OPB), 81 3 architectural templates that are synthesizable and that can be prototyped, 83 82 one design space exploration tool, 84 2 operating system (OS).83 2 operating systems (DNA/OS and MUTEK. 85 84 \\ 86 The framework fonctionality will be demonstrated with XXX-EXAMPLE1, XXX-EXAMPLE2 87 and XXX-EXAMPLE3 on 4 archictures (generic/XILINX, generic/ALTERA, 88 proprietary/XILINX, proprietary/ALTERA). 89 85 The framework fonctionality will be demonstrated with the demonstrators 86 (see task-7 page~\pageref{task-7}) and the tutorial example (see task-8 87 page~\ref{subtask-tutorial}. -
anr/section-4.1.tex
r65 r99 17 17 In figures, the dotted boxes are the softwares or formats that COACH 18 18 has to provide and to support. 19 \ vspace*{.75ex}\par19 \parlf 20 20 For the system generation presented in figure~\ref{archi-csg}, the conductor 21 21 is the tool \verb!CSG! (COACH System Generator). Its inputs are a process … … 35 35 FPGA device\footnote{Additional partial bitstreams are generated in case of 36 36 dynamic partial reconfiguration}. 37 \\38 37 %To proove CSG that COACH is open and CSG is really configurable, COACH will 39 38 %basically support 3 architecture template (the COACH template based on a 40 39 %MIPS processors and a VCI token ring, the Altera template based on the NIOS 41 %and AVALON bus, the Xilinx template based on the MICROBLAZE and OPB bus)40 %and AVALON bus, the Xilinx template based on the MICROBLAZE and PLB bus) 42 41 %and 2 operating systems (DNA/OS and MUTEK). Furthermore, thus is enforced 43 42 %by the \mustbecompleted{FIXME:zied} contribution that consists in … … 46 45 %Finally, it is important to notice that this work is a strong 47 46 %enhancement of the SocLib software. 48 \ vspace*{.75ex}\par47 \parlf 49 48 The software architecture for HAS is presented in figure~\ref{archi-hls}. 50 49 The input is a single task of the process network. The HAS tools do not work … … 61 60 Furthermore, the back-end tools uses a macro-cell library (functional and memory 62 61 unit). 63 \ vspace*{.75ex}\par62 \parlf 64 63 In addition to digital system design, HPC requires a supplementary 65 64 partitioning step presented in figure~\ref{archi-hpc}. The designer … … 70 69 simulator. Once the partitioning is validated, the design of the FPGA part 71 70 is done through \verb!CSG! (figure~\ref{archi-csg}). 72 \vspace*{.75ex}\par73 71 \mustbecompleted{FIXME == MODIFICATION DE LA FIGURE} 74 The project is split into 8 tasks numbered from 0 to 7. 75 The first task (task 0) is the project management, the last one (task 7) is 76 the dissemination the other task are listed below: 77 \begin{enumerate} 78 \item\textbf{\Backbone:} This task tackles the fundamental points of the 72 \parlf 73 The project is split into 8 tasks numbered from 1 to 8. There are described 74 bellow and detailled in section \ref{task-description}. 75 \begin{description} 76 \item[Task-1: \textit{Project management}] 77 This task relies to the monitoring of the COACH project. 78 \item[Task-2: \textit{\Backbone}] This task tackles the fundamental points of the 79 79 project such as the defintion of the COACH inputs and outputs, 80 80 the internal formats (e.g. \xcoach), the architectural templates and 81 81 the design flow. 82 \item \textbf{System generation:}This task addresses the prototyping and82 \item[task-3: \textit{System generation}] This task addresses the prototyping and 83 83 the generation of digital system. Apart from HAS that belong to the task 3 84 84 and 4, its components are those presented figure~\ref{archi-csg} 85 85 (e.g. \verb!CSG!, operating systems). 86 \item \textbf{HAS front-end:}This task mainly focusses on four functionalities:86 \item[Task-4: \textit{HAS front-end}] This task mainly focusses on four functionalities: 87 87 optimization of the memory usage, parallelism enhancement through loop 88 88 transformations, coarse grain parallelization and ASIP generation. 89 \item \textbf{HAS back-end:}This task groups two functionalities:89 \item[Task-5: \textit{HAS back-end}] This task groups two functionalities: 90 90 High-Level Synthesis of data dominated description and HLS of control 91 91 dominated description. … … 93 93 that will allow the coprocessors to respect the processor \& the bus 94 94 frequency. 95 \item \textbf{Communication between PC \& FPGA-SoC:}95 \item[Task-6: \textit{PC/FPGA communication middleware}] 96 96 This task pools the features dedicated to HPC. The main are the 97 97 partitioning validation (see figure~\ref{archi-hpc}), the sytem drivers for 98 98 both PC and FPGA-SoC sides, the hardware communication components and 99 99 support for dynamic partial reconfiguration. 100 \item \textbf{Demonstrators:}100 \item[Task-7: \textit{Industrial demonstrators}] 101 101 This task groups the demonstrators of the COACH project. 102 \mustbecompleted{FIXME} 103 \end{enumerate} 102 Most of them are industrial applications that will be developped with the COACH 103 framework. 104 Others consist in integrating COACH framework as a driver of industrial proprietary 105 design tools. 106 \item{Task 8: \textit{Dissemination}} 107 This task relies to the diffusion of the project results. 108 It mainly consists of the production of 4 COACH releases (\verb!T0+12!, \verb!T0+18!, 109 \verb!T0+24! and \verb!T0+36!) 110 and the publication on a WEB site of a tutorial. 111 \end{description} 104 112 % 105 113 \begin{figure}\leavevmode\center … … 109 117 \end{figure} 110 118 Figure~\ref{dependence-task} presents the tasks dependencies. 111 "$ task-N \longrightarrow task-M$" means that $task-N$ impacts the $task-M$.119 "$T_N \longrightarrow T_M$" means that $T_N$ impacts the $T_M$. 112 120 The more bold is the arrow, the more important is the dependency. 113 121 The graph shows: 114 122 \begin{itemize} 115 \item Even that $T 3$ and $T4$ functionalities are complementary, their123 \item Even that $T4$ and $T5$ functionalities are complementary, their 116 124 developments are independent (thanks to \xcoach internal format). 117 \item $T 2$ slightly depends on $T3$ and $T4$. Indeed, $T2$ may works118 without $T 3$ and $T4$ if we limit to digital systems without hardware125 \item $T3$ slightly depends on $T4$ and $T5$. Indeed, $T3$ may works 126 without $T4$ and $T5$ if we limit to digital systems without hardware 119 127 accellerators. 120 \item $T 2$ strongly impacts on $T5$ but, $T2$ does not depend at all on121 $T 5$. So demonstrators ($T6$) of embedded system would not be impacted if122 $T 5$ would fail.123 \item $T 1$ drives all the tasks ($T2$, $T3$, $T4$, $T5$) at the heart of128 \item $T3$ strongly impacts on $T6$ but, $T3$ does not depend at all on 129 $T6$. So demonstrators ($T7$) of embedded system would not be impacted if 130 $T6$ would fail. 131 \item $T2$ drives all the tasks ($T3$, $T4$, $T5$, $T6$) at the heart of 124 132 the COACH project. 125 \item The demonstrators developped in $T 6$, of course, strongly depends on the achievements126 of the prvious tasks ($T 1$, $T2$, $T3$, $T4$, $T5$).127 \item $T 7$ and $T0$ respectively depends on and impacts all the other tasks.133 \item The demonstrators developped in $T7$, of course, strongly depends on the achievements 134 of the prvious tasks ($T2$, $T3$, $T4$, $T5$, $T6$). 135 \item $T8$ and $T1$ respectively depends on and impacts all the other tasks. 128 136 \end{itemize} 129 137 This organisation offers enough robustness to insure the success of the 130 project except for the specification task $T 1$.131 132 The only critical task in this chart is T1. \label{xcoach-problem}138 project except for the specification task $T2$. 139 \\ 140 The only critical task in this chart is $T2$. \label{xcoach-problem} 133 141 However, the partners met 134 142 10 times (a one day meeting per month) during the last year to prepare the 135 143 specification and the project proposal. This gives us a degree of confidence 136 that T1will be completed in time.144 that $T2$ will be completed in time. -
anr/section-6.1.tex
r97 r99 90 90 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 91 91 \subsubsection{\upmc} 92 92 93 University Pierre et Marie Curie (UPMC) is the largest university in France (7400 employees,38000 students). 93 94 The Laboratoire d'Informatique de Paris 6 (LIP6) is the computer science laboratory of UPMC, hosting 94 95 more than 400 researchers, under the umbrella of the CNRS (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique). 95 The ï¿œ System on Chip ï¿œDepartment of LIP6 consists of 80 people, including 40 PHD students.96 The \og System on Chip \fg Department of LIP6 consists of 80 people, including 40 PHD students. 96 97 The research focus on CAD tools and methods for VLSI and System on Chip design. 97 \ \98 \parlf 98 99 The annual budget is about 3 M{\texteuro}, and 1.5 M{\texteuro} are from research contracts. 99 100 The SoC department has been involved in several european projects :IDPS, EVEREST, OMI-HIC, OMI-MACRAME, 100 101 OMI-ARCHES, EUROPRO, COSY, Medea SMT, Medea MESA, Medea+ BDREAMS, Medea+ TSAR. 102 \parlf 101 103 The public domain VLSI CAD system ALLIANCE, developped at UPMC is installed in more than 200 universities worldwide. 102 104 The LIP6 is in charge of the technical coordination of the SoCLib national project, and is hosting … … 110 112 of control-dominated coprocessors. 111 113 This tool will be modified to be integrated in the Coach design flow. 114 \parlf 112 115 Even if the preferred dissemination policy for the Coach design flow will be the free software policy, 113 116 (following the SoCLib model), the SoC department is ready to support start-ups : Six startup companies … … 115 118 116 119 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 117 \subsubsection{\altera}118 119 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%120 120 \subsubsection{\xilinx} 121 121 122 \xilinx is the world leader in the domain of programmable logic circuits (FPGA). 123 \xilinx develops in one hand several FPGA architectures (CoolRunner, Spartan and Virtex 124 families) and in the other hand a software solution allowing exploiting the 125 characteristics of these FPGA. 126 \parlf 127 The tools proposed can allow the designer to describe his architecture from modeling 128 language (VHDL/Verilog) to an optimized architecture implemented to the selected 129 technology. 130 The team located at Grenoble is responsible of the logic synthesis tool development (XST) 131 of the software solution, which aggregates all the steps allowing proceeding from a HDL 132 model to a technological netlist: 133 \begin{itemize} 134 \item Compilation of HDL code and model generation at Register Transfer Level (RTL). 135 \item RTL model optimizations. 136 \item Inference and generation of optimized macro blocks (Finite states machine, counter). 137 \item Boolean equations generation for randomly logic. 138 \item Logical, mapping and timing optimizations. 139 \end{itemize} 140 \parlf 141 The architectures developed by \xilinx offer a collection of technological primitives 142 (variable complexity) from simple Boolean generators (LUT) to complex DSP blocks or memory 143 and whether configurable processor cores (Pico and MicroBlaze families). 144 This kind of architecture allows, thus, the designer to validate different 145 hardware/software possibilities in a High Level Synthesis (HLS) framework. 146 \parlf 147 The classical optimization techniques focus, mainly, on the frequency aspects and on 148 available resources use. 149 The optimizations, taking into account the consumption criteria, become critical due to 150 the fact of the increase of the architecture complexity and due to the use of FPGA 151 component for low power applications. 152 122 153 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 123 154 \subsubsection{\bull} 124 155 156 \bull designs and develops servers and software for an open environment, integrating the 157 most advanced technologies. It brings to its customers its expertise and know-how to help 158 them in the transformation of their information systems and to optimize their IT 159 infrastructure and their applications. 160 \parlf 161 \bull is particularly present in the public sector, banking, finance, telecommunication 162 and industry sectors. Capitalizing on its wide experience, the Group has a thorough 163 understanding of the business and specific processes of these sectors, thus enabling it to 164 efficiently advise and to accompany its customers. Its distribution network spreads to 165 over 100 countries worldwide. 166 \parlf 167 The team participating to the COACH project is from the Server Development Department 168 based in Les Clayes-sous-Bois, France. The SD Department is in charge of developing 169 hardware for open servers (e.g. NovaScale) and HPC solutions. Its main activities range 170 from architecture specification, ASIC design/verification/prototyping to board design and 171 include also specific EDA development to complement standard tools. 172 125 173 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 126 174 \subsubsection{\thales} … … 132 180 \subsubsection{\navtel} 133 181 182 \navtel was created in 1994 to develop flexible systems based on FPGAs and currently 183 focuses on intelligent signal mining for knowlege based signal processing systems. 184 The company main activity covers the following domains: satellite communication, 185 aeronautics, imaging and security. 186 \navtel dedicates about 70\% of its activity to client projects in satellite, aeronautical 187 and imaging systems and 30\% to its own research programmes in collaboration with French 188 and international partners. 189 \parlf 190 The multi disciplinary technical team comprises 6 engineers for signal processing and 191 hardware development and one technician. 192 \parlf 193 \navtel has its own Ph.D program which includes in the past (classification technology 194 and MIMO for FPGA implementation) and currently the preparation of a project for remote 195 sensing with signal intelligence for satellite application. The company participates in 196 national and European level projects contributing to a strategic alliance between academic 197 and industrial partners.\\ 198 The current research covers particle filter applications for communication and RADAR, 199 Cognitive Radio, Satellite communication, embedded super computing and focuses on low 200 power algorithms for implementation in FPGA and soft computing. 201 \parlf 202 For manufacturing and industrialization, \navtel works with ISO certified partners. 203 The company clients include the CNES, ThalÚs Alenia Space, ThalÚs Communication, EADS, 204 Eutelsat, AIRBUS, Schlumberger. \navtel participates from the R\&D phase through to the 205 system delivery. 206 207 \begin{description} 208 \item[Recognitions:]\mbox{} 209 \begin{itemize} 210 \item EC Challenge+ programme for innovative projects (promotion 9) 211 \item Innovation and technology development \og Troph\'{e}es R\'{e}gion Centre \fg 212 \item Recognition by the French Senate for company creation during the 213 \og Semaine de l'entrepreneur \fg 2005. 214 \end{itemize} 215 \end{description} -
anr/section-7.tex
r87 r99 31 31 costs. The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 100\% of 32 32 the total ANR requested funding. 33 \begin{center}\input{table_lip_short.tex}\end{center} 33 34 34 35 \item [Subcontracting] … … 41 42 The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% 42 43 of the total requested ANR funding.\\ 43 \begin{center}\input{table_lip_short.tex}\end{center}44 44 \end{description} 45 45 … … 74 74 The requested funding for non permanent personnels is 82\% of the total ANR 75 75 requested funding. 76 \begin{center}\input{table_tima_short.tex}\end{center} 76 77 \item [Subcontracting] 77 78 No subcontracting costs. … … 83 84 The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% 84 85 of the total requested ANR funding.\\ 85 \begin{center}\input{table_tima_short.tex}\end{center}86 %FIXME comment on rajoute les hommes-ans sur le WP7 pour la dissemination ?87 86 \end{description} 88 87 89 88 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 90 89 \subsection{Partner 4: \ubs} 90 \begin{figure}\leavevmode\center 91 \input{table_ubs_full.tex} 92 \caption{\label{ress-detail-ubs}Man power in $mm$ for the delivrables of \ubs.} 93 \end{figure} 91 94 92 95 \begin {description} 93 96 \item [Equipment] 94 \par95 97 In order to validate the design flow project, the LabSTICC laboratory will buy FPGA developpement boards. 96 98 The cost for these FPGA boards is estimated to 3\% of the total ANR funding. 97 99 \item [Personnel costs] 98 \par99 100 The faculty members involved in the project are 100 101 associate professors (Philippe COUSSY, Cyrille CHAVET) or research ingeneers (Dominique HELLER). 101 102 All non-permanent personnel costs are estimated in men*months 102 103 for senior researchers (post-doc or research engineers). 104 103 105 The table below sumarizes the man power by task for both permanent and non-permanent 104 personnels. The detail by delivrables is given in figure~\ref { detail-lip6}.106 personnels. The detail by delivrables is given in figure~\ref {ress-detail-ubs}. 105 107 The non-permanent personnels costs represent 50\% of the personnal costs. 106 108 The requested funding for non permanent personnels is about 83\% of the total ANR 107 109 requested funding. 110 \begin{center}\input{table_ubs_short.tex}\end{center} 108 111 \item [Subcontracting] 109 \par110 112 No subcontracting costs. 111 113 \item [Travel] 112 \par113 114 The travel costs are associated to management and meeting as 114 115 well as participation to conferences. The travel costs are estimated 115 116 to 10\% of the total requested ANR funding. 116 117 \item [Expenses for inward billing] 117 \par118 118 The costs justified by internal invoicing procedures are evaluated to 4\% 119 119 of the total requested ANR funding. 120 \mustbecompleted{FIXME: LIP6 :: Comment peut-on modifier automatiquement le contenu du tableau (sans modifier directement le121 fichier)}122 \\123 %\input{table_ubs.tex}124 120 \end {description} 125 121 … … 160 156 161 157 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 162 \subsection{Partner 6: \altera} 158 \subsection{Partner 6: \xilinx} 159 \ressourcehelp 160 \begin{figure}\leavevmode\center 161 \input{table_xilinx_full.tex} 162 \caption{\label{ress-detail-xilinx}Man power in $mm$ for the delivrables of \xilinx.} 163 \end{figure} 164 \begin{description} 165 \item[Equipment] 166 No specific equipment acquisition is required for this project. 167 \item[Personnel costs] 168 \xilinx employees involved in the project are permanent Software Engineers. 169 The detail by delivrables is given in figure~\ref{ress-detail-xilinx} and 170 summarizes by task in the following table. 171 \begin{center}\input{table_xilinx_short.tex}\end{center} 172 \item[Subcontracting] 173 No subcontracting costs. 174 \item[Travel] 175 The travel costs are associated to project meeting as well as participation to 176 conferences. The travel costs are estimated to 177 \mustbecompleted{FIXME:\xilinx: XX\%} of the total requested ANR funding. 178 \item[Expenses for inward billing] none 179 \item[Other working costs] none 180 \end{description} 181 182 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 183 \subsection{Partner 7: \bull} 163 184 \ressourcehelp 164 185 165 186 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 166 \subsection{Partner 7: \xilinx}187 \subsection{Partner 8: \thales} 167 188 \ressourcehelp 168 189 169 190 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 170 \subsection{Partner 8: \bull}191 \subsection{Partner 9: \zied} 171 192 \ressourcehelp 172 193 173 194 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 174 \subsection{Partner 9: \thales}195 \subsection{Partner 10: \navtel} 175 196 \ressourcehelp 176 197 177 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%178 \subsection{Partner 10: \zied}179 \ressourcehelp180 181 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%182 \subsection{Partner 11: \navtel}183 \ressourcehelp184 -
anr/task-7.tex
r78 r99 38 38 \CoutHorsD{6}{36}{\Stima}{dissemination}{0:2:2} 39 39 \end{livrable} 40 \item This \ST consists of making a COACH tutorial and to publish it on the public WEB 40 \item 41 \label{subtask-tutorial} 42 This \ST consists of making a COACH tutorial and to publish it on the public WEB 41 43 site. The tutorial example will also be used as reference demonstrator of the 42 44 framework.
Note: See TracChangeset
for help on using the changeset viewer.